Every interview I saw with Brad he seemed the perfect guy for the job. Smart and had a take no shit attitude. Sad to hear.

High pressure job. Hope he gets the help he needs.

quote:

Originally posted by roberth:
Oh they're lying...again.

OCTOBER SURPRISE ACCELERATED: @NYTimes Trump Tax Return Lies Melting Faster Than an Ice Cream Cone in Jerry Nadler's Pants

quote:

Saving you the time of an exhausting New Marxist Times article that plainly admits it has no idea about the completeness or accuracy of its reporting...

The Times has a breaking, must-read scoop! They somehow -- and illegally -- obtained some of the President's tax returns, and they show... well, the Times doesn't really understand complex tax returns, so they make it up! Trump paid no taxes!

I want his accountant! Why be mad, libs? The man has good people working for him unlike you dumbasses!

Silliness, who the heck pays extra taxes on purpose?

I'm much more interested in seeing the tax records of all the public servants who become rich while in office, than those of one rich guy who became a public servant.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Ironbutt,

It's amazing how the media can flagrantly violate the law, and at times jeopardize national security, and not face a single penalty.

He does a damned good "Biden", he do!

quote:

Originally posted by BigSwede:
Silliness, who the heck pays extra taxes on purpose?

Precisely! And I haven't seen anyone prove that Trump broke any tax laws. The very rich have tax lawyers & accountants, who are paid to take advantage of any tax loophole possible.

Biden, Pelosi, and Schumer have all have been Congress Critters for 30 or 40-some years, so they themselves probably either wrote some of those loopholes into the tax code or voted on them.

And while Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, and all the other millionaire swamp creatures all take advantage of the same tax loopholes, the media & the Dems are only interested in Trumps taxes.

Time Cube!

Next declassification could flip Russia collusion script, point to effort to hurt Trump

https://justthenews.com/accoun...lip-russia-collusion

Former NSC official says some evidence cut against claim Russia was helping Trump.

The Trump administration is preparing one of its biggest declassifications yet in the Russia case, a super-secret document that could flip the collusion theory on its head four years after the FBI first started its investigation.

Multiple officials familiar with the planned declassification, which could happen as early as this week, told Just the News that the new evidence will raise the specter that Russian President Vladimir Putin was actually trying to hurt President Trump, not help his election in 2016, as the Obama administration claimed.

The new evidence would complement a revelation last week that the primary source for the Christopher Steele anti-Trump dossier was known to the U.S. government to be tied to Russia intelligence, raising the possibility that the Russians were undercutting the GOP nominee.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., hinted at the big revelation in a Sunday appearance on the Fox News show "Sunday Futures with Maria Bartiromo."

"Everything Russia-Trump was looked at. You had $25 million, 60 agents. You had subpoenas, you had people’s lives turned upside down," Graham said. "The question is, 'Did they look at Russia coming after Trump?' "

Referring to last week’s revelation, Graham added: “We’ve got a Russian spy on the payroll of the Democratic Party putting together a document that details the FBI was not reliable.”

The possibility that the FBI and CIA had reason to suspect Russia was trying to hurt Trump and help rival Hillary Clinton first emerged in a Just the News article last month that revealed a House Intelligence Committee secret report accused the U.S Intelligence Community Assessment of ignoring credible evidence that the Russians tried to help Clinton in 2016.

"When I was briefed on the House Intelligence Committee report on the January 2017 ICA, I was told that John Brennan politicized this assessment by excluding credible intelligence that the Russians wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election and ordered weak intelligence included that Russia wanted Trump to win,” former CIA and National Security Council official Fred Fleitz said last month.

Brennan was the CIA director at the time.

"I also was told that Brennan took both actions over the objections of CIA analysts. I am concerned about what happened to these analysts and worry that they may have been subjected to retaliation by CIA management," Fleitz also said. "These analysts are true whistleblowers, and they should come to the congressional intelligence committees to tell their stories and set the record straight on the ICA."

An official familiar with the document said it will show the intelligence community “cherry-picked pebbles of evidence” to make the case Russia sought to help Trump win in 2016 when there was similar evidence to the contrary.

Several prominent Russia experts, including the CIA’s former station chief in Moscow, have argued that the intelligence community assessment got it wrong and that Russia’s true intentions in 2016 was actually to sow chaos and discord in America without regard to which candidate won.

for what its worth I don't think the President should bring up Hunter Biden in the debate

that opens up a Pandora's Box of attacks on children which we don't need

Bidet himself provides enough ammo to eviscerate himself

For those of you who are just certain that mail-in ballot fraud will cause President Trump to lose the election, here's something for you.

I have to tell you- and this is not directed at any member of SIGforum- I am deeply, deeply disappointed in some conservative political pundits embracing this idiotic "Red Mirage" theory. Have they even bothered to look for the origin of this theory? The origin is left wing Axios. Axios is trying to frighten and discourage us and trying to bolster the leftists, and some supposedly knowledgeable and savvy conservative voices are guilty of validating this crap. Now is not the time for fear and for spreading uncertainty.

Anyway, have a look at this. Dr. Turley's manner of speaking sometimes gets under my skin, so watch your volume level for this video, but, that aside, if you find yourself needing encouragement, take a look:

What would you say if someone told you that the leftists are now beginning to encourage in-person voting?

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-third-time-n2577092

A group of Australian law professors have given President Trump his third Nobel Peace Prize nomination for his commitment to ending foreign wars.

"The Trump Doctrine is something extraordinary, as so many things that Donald Trump does," law professor David Flint explained on Sky News. "He is guided by two things, which seem to be absent from so many politicians. He has firstly common sense and he is only guided by a national interest, and therefore, in our circumstances, an interest in the Western alliance. What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided that he would no longer have America involved in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing, but the killing of thousands of young Americans and enormous debts imposed on America."

quote:

that opens up a Pandora's Box of attacks on children which we don't need

Seriously??? Hunter is NOT a child. He is an ADULT who was kicked out of the Navy for using drugs (getting in on a waiver his father got him) and used his father's political position to enrich himself to the detriment of this country. He ABSOLUTLY is on the menu. His shady deals with the Chinese, Russians, and the Ukrainians were all predicated on his fathers position as VP. And his father DID NOT CARE that he was selling out the country for some money. He is 100% fair game.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
"The Trump Doctrine is something extraordinary, as so many things that Donald Trump does," law professor David Flint explained on Sky News. "He is guided by two things, which seem to be absent from so many politicians. He has firstly common sense and he is only guided by a national interest, and therefore, in our circumstances, an interest in the Western alliance.

As has been so correcty pointed out, Donald Trump is not a politician, and this is why he doesn't behave like a politician. And now- because of Donald Trump's presidency- we see the real problem with our government throughout our history- and that is that we have been governed by career politicians, who are, by their very nature, self-serving. If they have any loyalty to anything other than themselves, it is a loyalty to their political party, and, as many, many Americans have begun to realize since Donald Trump was elected, there is no actual difference between the Republican and Democratic parties of this nation. Therefore, it has not been a case of Republican versus Democrat; it has been a case of career politicians of any stripe, against the American people.

I came to this realization some 20 years ago when the then-sheriff of my county was recalled due to all the changes he made to the agency’s operations: People claim to despise politicians—until they stop acting like politicians, and then they hate that even more.

We were exceptionally fortunate that enough voters looked past that superficial view of Donald Trump in 2016, but far too many others refuse to and to this day base their objection to him solely on the fact that he doesn’t act like a politician and pander to their sensitive feelings.

quote:

for what its worth I don't think the President should bring up Hunter Biden in the debate

before you go there, check out the "Joe Biden on the campaign trail" thread p141

watch the video by Peter Schweitzer called "Riding the Dragon". It is not fast paced, but let it sink in

That's the beauty of this debate. They can try to script it all they want and let Biden see all the cards and try to give him every advantage but the President will not follow a script. Apparently China is not on the list of subjects that will be asked about but anyone want to bet Trump finds a way to work it in?

Same with Hunter. He won't be off limits for Trump and he shouldn't be. I think Trump goes right for Bidens jugular in this debate and looks to end it in one round. It could be ugly.