And to add to TMats video he posted, the actor talks about the Trump team and briefly mentions the transition team being financed by private money because Trump can't wait, but that is apparently inaccurate; it would seem Trump is deliberately avoiding Deep State money and involvement in his transition, telling them to pound sand.



https://theconservativetreehou...ernment/#more-265414

The process Raskin (who was on the Jan 6th committee) is talking about was created by Obama and his General Services Administration and used by Trump in 2016 and Biden in 2020. It looks like Trump is avoiding this "continuity transition" protocol like the plague because it involves Obama and his bureaucrats in the transition. One note- the GSA was used by the FBI in assisting in the Mar A Lago raid.

Vance to Appear on ‘Joe Rogan Experience’ Podcast
Following Trump’s appearance on the popular podcast, the vice presidential candidate is scheduled to be interviewed Wednesday.


Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) will appear on “The Joe Rogan Experience” soon, according to a spokesman for former President Donald Trump’s running mate.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...aPWpP0KzNNvIGHRtg%3D

quote:

Originally posted by sjtill:
I'm normally an optimistic guy, then I read something like the article below and know I'm not going to sleep well--not until November 6, but until January 22.

Is the Left Preparing for War if Trump Wins?

When you have the New York Times releasing this article, I feel like this could be a real possibility and not hyperbole.

There Are Four Anti-Trump Pathways We Failed to Take. There Is a Fifth. /Oct. 24, 2024:

https://archive.vn/souxT#selection-673.0-679.13

Also read:

Red alert: Liberal elites plan ‘Color Revolution’ if Trump wins…

https://revolver.news/2024/10/...ution-to-stop-trump/

He jumped into bed with a band of back stabbing whores and is now feeling the consequences


Dems release attack ad against California GOP congressman who voted to impeach Trump

https://nypost.com/2024/10/29/...lowing-jan-6-attack/

Democrats dropped a new ad taking aim at Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) for supporting efforts to impeach former President Donald Trump following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — as part of an election tactic to dissuade GOP voters from backing their party’s candidate as Election Day looms.

The 30-second TV ad from Voter Protection Project, a group that supports Democratic candidates, warns Republican voters in California’s 22nd district that the five-term incumbent Valadao “turned his back on President Trump and the whole MAGA movement.”

The ad, which was released last week, continues with a clip of the California Republican saying: “We don’t need President Trump.”

Democrats forked over more than $53 million to boost far-right Republican primary candidates in nine key states in 2022 — despite protesting the threat such candidates posed if they took office.

Valadoa is currently facing an uphill battle for re-election in his blue-leaning district against two-time challenger Rudy Salas, a Democrat, who is making his second attempt to flip the seat.

The GOP incumbent is trailing his Democratic challenger among likely voters by 2 points, 45% to 47%, with 8% undecided, according to polling conducted by The Hill.

Valadao is one of two House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump remaining in office, along with Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.).

Less than two weeks after the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, Valadao said he voted for impeachment because Trump “was, without question, a driving force in the catastrophic events that took place on Jan. 6.”

“[Trump’s] inciting rhetoric was un-American, abhorrent and absolutely an impeachable offense,” Valadao said on Twitter on Jan. 13, 2021.

Biden is a dumb bastard, but I can't help but think he's doing this shit on purpose as payback for how they ousted him. That's twice now he's smacked her right in the middle of public speeches.

Joe Biden cannot remember what office he holds, but his hateful and vindictive personality still shines through.

A few thoughts.

What is most disturbing to me about this election is that half the country is either brain dead or blind with hatred. (I count knee-jerk Democrats among the brain dead.)

If Hitler ran against Trump, those blind with hatred would vote for Hitler.

I will take anyone with a platform who supports Trump. But don't trust Megan Kelly for a minute.

quote:

But don't trust Megan Kelly for a minute.

Why not?

Has anyone seen this yet?

ABC has sparked wild conspiracy theories after mistakenly airing election results for Pennsylvania.
Daily Mail Link

ABC has sparked wild conspiracy theories after mistakenly airing election results for Pennsylvania.

The results appeared on the ticker along the bottom of the screen during a broadcast of the Formula 1 Mexico Grand Prix by ABC local affiliate WNEP-TV on Sunday.

It showed Kamala Harris taking the state with 52 percent of the votes, while Donald Trump's share was 47 percent.

It instantly prompted claims of election rigging on social media, with one person tweeting: 'The cheat is on.'

WNEP-TV said that the numbers came up on the screen in 'error' and that they had been 'randomly generated' as part of a test ahead of election night on November 5.


Trump is currently leading the state by 0.6 percentage points in an average of the top polls by Real Clear Politics.

Biden won Pennsylvania by the narrowest of margins in 2020, beating Trump by 80,555 votes or 1.17 percent.

Democrats have accused Trump and his allies of laying the groundwork to contest a potential loss by stoking doubts about the election's legitimacy.

He has portrayed Democrats as cheaters, called mail-in ballots corrupt and urged supporters to vote in such large numbers to render the election 'too big to rig.'

In response to the WNEP-TV broadcast, one person wrote on X: 'If the same graphics pop up after November 5th, with the same percentages & the same vote count, it'll be EXTREMELY suspicious. And the media wonders why nobody trusts them?'

Another said: 'ABC is cheating for the Democrat machine. Their license should be revoked.'

In a statement the broadcaster said: 'Those numbers should not have appeared on the screen, and it was an error by WNEP that they did.

'The numbers seen on the screen were randomly generated test results sent out to help news organizations make sure their equipment is working properly in advance of election night.

'The numbers were not reflective of any actual vote count.

'Pennsylvania law does not allow mail-in ballots to be taken out of their envelopes until 7:00 a.m. on Election Day, and no votes of any kind will be counted in Pennsylvania until after the polls close at 8:00 p.m.

'WNEP regrets the error and apologizes for any confusion. We have taken steps to ensure that it does not happen again.'

ABC has already been attacked by Trump and his supporters overs its alleged bias during the presidential debate on September 10.

Conservative commentators claimed that the moderators continually fact-checked Trump while giving Harris a free pass.

In addition, an anonymous whistleblower alleged ABC handed questions to the Harris campaign ahead of the debate.

Why should Megan Kelly not be trusted?

In the primaries for the 2016 election, she had the first question going to Trump. And it was the lowest kind of "gotcha" question. To summarize it, "Are you still abusing women?"

She hurt Trump pretty badly with women, and that turned out to be a main Democrat attack on him, still going strong.

She would appear on her show in the most revealing outfits possible, while lecturing against "treating women as sex objects." She was literally playing both sides of the issue – getting attention as a sex object, while protesting against women as sex objects.

Her career went down the toilet. Did Fox News fire her? On The Ellen Show (a kind of one woman The View) she said she left "because of Trump." Fox was pumping him up, which was unbearable to her.

But there is another view: that Fox fired her when she demanded an astronomical salary even has her ratings plummeted. She went to NBC news, where she tried out as a liberal. It didn't work out, and she left.

So she opened a podcast, which is where she is now. And guess what? She can't say enough good things about Donald Trump and Republicans in general!

You can trust her if you want. But I don't. Not for a minute.

I'm with Joe. She's as trustworthy as Anne Coulter to me. It's currently favorable to her career to back Trump. The moment it isn't, she'll turn around around and bite him in the back again.

quote:

I will take anyone with a platform who supports Trump. But don't trust Megan Kelly for a minute.

From what I have seen she has been spot on during this election season.

quote:

Originally posted by JohnCourage:
From what I have seen she has been spot on during this election season.

Right, but nobody is saying she isn't smart, here. I would sooner trust a loyal moron than a clever and shrewd opportunist.

She was trained as a lawyer, and she is very smart. But smart is only one thing about a person. Obama was educated at Columbia and Harvard Law School. Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. Together they don't have an ounce of integrity.

quote:

Originally posted by P220 Smudge:
I'm with Joe. She's as trustworthy as Anne Coulter to me. It's currently favorable to her career to back Trump. The moment it isn't, she'll turn around around and bite him in the back again.

You clearly don't listen to her or her show then if you think that.

Megan has made a turn in the right direction unlike Coulter who is suffering from TDS.
Huge difference between these two gals.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
You clearly don't listen to her or her show then if you think that.

I've watched a lot of clips from her this year, but I don't watch her show, no. File this one under "time will tell."

quote:

Originally posted by 83v45magna:
Has anyone seen this yet?

ABC has sparked wild conspiracy theories after mistakenly airing election results for Pennsylvania.
Daily Mail Link

ABC has sparked wild conspiracy theories after mistakenly airing election results for Pennsylvania.

Just more Predictive Programming, it's what they do.

A legit mistake is when this goes up and a producer pulls it 3 seconds later. It's my understanding this was on the screen for several minutes. There's no way that was a "mistake".

Reporting from Ireland this week:

My eldest child and I have been spending the week at our Ireland house. It’s her first visit to the house, third time in Ireland. I’ve been introducing her to the folks that live in this village (population ~500 or so.)

Last night she said to me “Is it normal for Irish people to ask you who you’re voting for? It’s literally the second question they ask after ‘where do you live in the States?’ It’s ridiculous!”

I’ve experienced the same thing. I immediately respond “Donald J. Trump!” because I don’t shy away from direct conversations. It seems that most folks in this part of Ireland support Trump but there are few Kamala fans. Overall, the Irish seem very anxious about our election.

“The coverage of your election is inescapable here, you can’t get away from it. Surely the American media can’t be covering the race as much as our press is here.”

I try not to shake my head when I hear this, and I’ve heard it more than once. “I don’t think that’s possible, it’s 2 years of campaigning,” I say.

The media here and in England are as liberal lunatic as they come. I read an article in a Dublin paper written by a middle-aged woman who was once was a nanny on 5th Avenue in NYC. Trump visited the father of the house once and, in this article, she says “It triggered the baby Hitler question for me. Should I have rushed into the library with a kitchen knife and spared the world of a future tyrant?” … and this was in a “reputable” paper, talk of killing Trump to do the world a favor. An editor and a publisher think this is responsible reportage. They really want to encourage another assassin. Despicable.

Most folks in the village are Trump supporters “but I wouldn’t want have a drink with him. He’s much better as a President than Harris.” One house down the road has a huge Trump flag flying: Donald Trump 2024 - F—- Your Feelings. I smile when I drive past that house.


Among the Kamala supporters I ask why they like her. “She’s so accomplished, she has real class, she’s very bright, I think she’d be great for America.” I ask if they know how she got her start in politics. I usually get blank stares. I mention Willie Brown… same vacant stares. “Never heard of him…” Of course, not. They are equally unaware that no one has ever voted for Kamala to run for President. “Oh, that’s not true, they had a primary!” Hard to argue with persons that are so uninformed. I don’t push beyond these two questions, what’s to be gained?

Unfortunately , my daughter is voting for Kamala. She works in NYC so it’s not that surprising to me. I’ve seen all four of my sisters go Democrat as they all now live in liberal areas or work in universities. Same thing happened to my very bright daughter, voting Democrat because of peer pressure and fear of being socially ostracized. (Yes, it’s only my opinion and observation.)

The gist is, Ireland seems invested in the outcome of our election and is emotional about the process.

I’m going to be back here in December. The Kamala fans say “Well, I hope you come back disappointed. I will be happy when she beats him.” It’s said with laughs and smiles. The people in this country are 100% kind, generous and friendly even if they disagree with your preferences. If only that were true of 100% of Americans.