As far as another debate goes, Harris and her handlers would never agree to have it happen with Fox News. You can forget that. The fact that they are even talking about another debate shows they are already aware that the way last night's debate was handled was a disaster for them.

Would Trump agree to another debate on enemy ground? Hell, I don't know, he doesn't need it but he just might do it. Trump is Trump...that's why we love him.

Trump was Trump, I'm not worried about it. Kamala came off as an arrogant, smirking bitch. I have to believe there are still people in the middle who haven't bought into all the propaganda and don't just hate the guy who watched that debate and decided that they didn't want Mrs. "I need to speak to your manager" as our head of state. Those people must exist, and they must exist in numbers significant enough to matter.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:
Huh? Why would Haitian Migrants carry dead geese to the police?

"...a caller reporting 4 Haitian Migrants carrying dead geese to the police".

I guess the Haitians wanted to prepare a nice dinner for the police.



.

"...a caller reporting to the police 4 Haitian Migrants carrying dead geese [b][/b]".

better?

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Kamala's team was fed the questions, but it should've have been necessary given the likelihood of the subjects coming up.

Where the real value comes is that if she did the debate freehand, without scripted questions or with teleprompters, she should be able to do interviews all the time and her refusal to do them in the past was complete BS.

The press should start insisting on interviews.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:
Huh? Why would Haitian Migrants carry dead geese to the police?

"...a caller reporting 4 Haitian Migrants carrying dead geese to the police".

Reminds me of the movie Clue:

"He threatened to kill me in public."

"Why would he want to kill you in public?"

"I think she meant he threatened, in public, to kill her."

"Oh."

Crappy writing. About what I expect from the msm. . .

Trump did great.

He is truly Teddy Roosevelt's 'Man in the Arena:"


It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

—Theodore Roosevelt

^^^A fitting Truth right there, and one that could not be more appropriate! The US has been blessed with a number of Great Leaders throughout our history...Courageous men that have stepped into the arena and risked much for this country! Donald Trump is one of them!

quote:

Originally posted by .38supersig:
Harris has a nice set of pearl earrings, I think I've seen them somewhere before.

The company responded and said the resemblance of what she was wearing and to their product was remarkable. Also the company is suing the China man for ripping off their patent. So she could have been wearing China man knock offs. Timmy probably picked them up in one of his thirty trips there and gave them to her.
At any rate if it's dastardly and underhanded she probably would do it. Given the questions beforehand isn't enough she needed someone in her ear to coach her along.

These debates carry no legitimacy in my opinion so I don't waste my time watching them. Nothing is on a level playing field when it comes to dealing with the Democrats on anything at any level. I doubt what ever happens in them changes anyone's mind. Everyone is watching and waiting for their team to get their snipes and digs in and that's about it.

The saying "It's like playing chess with a chicken. They jump up on the board strut around knocking all the pieces over, shit on everything and then say they won" Is a good description of how the Democrats approach these debates.

quote:

Originally posted by lastmanstanding:
Given the questions beforehand isn't enough she needed someone in her ear to coach her along

There was one particular moment, I can't say when, when her response struck me as odd. Too quick, too glib, too extemporaneous, particularly for her. She was clearly happy with that response, almost surprised,

Maybe it was just me but yeah, an odd, out of character moment that stunk of someone putting words in her mouth.

We don’t need another ‘debate’ which was never a debate to begin with

We need actions and not words.

I tried to watch the debate, I really did. Just couldn't do it, but then I have high blood pressure, so there is that.
From everything I've heard, Harris with all the help MAY have won the debate, but Trump won more votes. The Democrats will never learn, and thank God for that.
Rod

did Kameltoe cheat during the debate with the ear pieces?

you bet your ass she did

Democrats are ALL liars and cheats, so for them the end justifies the means - any means

Every time the "moderators" interjected with a fact check or comment, I wish Trump would have said "I'm not debating you. Your only job is to ask a question, then keep your mouth shut. Is that understood?" If he does this again, they need to be quickly shut down, each and every time. Do not engage with them.

The debate itself is no longer a real thing. It is a platform to generate material for the propagandist media to use in the following weeks. The party base on both sides is already decided, and have their view of the opposition cemented. The undecideds won't be won or lost during the debate, or they at least will not be exposed to anything new.

How the media can use the debate to shape public opinion is the game being played. Had the media strongly defended Joe after his debate, he'd still be viewed by the low-information voter as competent. Instead they followed orders and in lockstep brought him down.

Were there an honest and impartial media, the coverage would analyze the candidates' understanding of issues and their policy differences. Since the media is not that, we observe the Dems performing for the camera while Trump tries to present facts and policy.

"News" coverage will be using debate bytes for propaganda, just as intended.

This Springfield, Ohio stuff is absolutely bonkers how far it has been taken.
I went to Wittenberg University which is in Springfield and have a number of friends still there.
One happens to be the Deputy Director of Community Coordination for the City of Springfield.
He said all they did yesterday was field calls from a bunch of pissed people that don’t even live in or near Springfield.
That is until someone called in bomb threat to the City buildings and they had to evacuate and stand outside for awhile.

People have become down right ridiculous.

^^^ Did he actually say none of this is true? Can you get us the truth about the city and the 15,000-20,000 illegals?

Reactions to the debate.

https://x.com/VigilantFox/stat...d-they-are-pissed%2F


https://x.com/TONYxTWO/status/...d-they-are-pissed%2F


https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1...d-they-are-pissed%2F

Of course there are Haitians eating people's pets, strays, feral domestic critters and wildlife (which most people don't eat).
And there are non-Haitians doing it too.

It is a direct result of the invasive illegals' pouring in and the screwed economy as well as societal "don't give a shit" mentality of the majority.

Hungry people of all demographics being poor under hardship are going to eat. Likely more of this having gone on than people realize, but many recently from other cultures and countries are not as restrained by taboo's of the west or America.


There are two basic problems with the "story".

1. It is not all the Haitian people, and it is not as if they are standing on street corners eating animals like crazed Zombies, so it becomes easy to ridicule the truth and embarrass those that do report actual occurrences. (the few that are seen in public are passed of as crazed and unconnected events)

2. The media, the left (but I am being redundant) are quick to weaponize any and everything against their perceived enemies, and that list is anyone that does not carry water or vote for them no matter what.

That's exactly why I asked Black since he has a contact within the town. Unless you live there.

I do not.

And, it was not directed at you or a response to your post, only my "generic" opinion/thought on the topic and how it has been "targeted" by the leftists as a means to embarrass and/or corral anyone they despise as "weird" for "outrageous thoughts".

Harris stated as much with her "same old playbook" mantra from the leftsts' worn out playbook.