“The old man and the C!”

Most Excellent!

quote:

Originally posted by dsiets:
I hope they lose a lot of sleep and the whole thing takes it's toll on them.
Sitting there and being questioned has to burn them.

Nah. I’d wager it’s at best a minor inconvenience to those thugs. I do second the investigation of their foundation.

They will simply do what their lawyers tell them to do. As others have said, just having to be there in the spotlight is bad enough for them.

I thought this was good from Coffee & Covid
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...-is-tuesday-february

"Faster than you can say I did not have relations with that investigation, the Clinton deposition story has kept blossoming into a beautiful but stinky flower. Early this morning, Politico reported, “As Republicans again target the Clintons, Democrats just want to turn the page.” Get thee under the bus.

Politico framed its story as Democrats wanting to turn the page — which is journalist-speak for “oh please make it stop.” They can see the subpoenas on the wall. But just relax. This is only going to hurt for a very long time.

“A youthful vanguard of progressive office-holders unlikely to even recall the Clinton presidency,” Politico reported, “have largely opted against defending the once formidable pair.” Representative Maxwell Frost, (D-Fla.), 28, one of the Democrats who voted to hold the Clintons in contempt, explained, “We want to be more aggressive and find the truth, and it’s less about allegiances to individuals, and more about what’s best for our party and what’s best for this country.”

Uh huh. Apparently, at least part of the Democrat Party has decided the Clintons are not what’s best for the party or the country. At last. “The party’s effective abandonment of its longtime standard bearers,” the article said, “provides a vivid illustration of how many members are eager to disassociate themselves from the Clinton brand.”

That escalated quickly! At the DNC Convention in the summer of 2024, the Clintons got a standing ovation.

That was just 18 months ago. Now they are making history, by becoming the first President and Secretary of State to sit for a hostile Congressional deposition under penalty of perjury. Yesterday, the Oversight Committee announced the proceedings would be live-streamed.

Politico’s story isn’t about Republicans attacking the Clintons. This is Democrats, feeding the Clintons to the Epstein wolves and hoping the wolves are full by the time they get to anyone else.

For decades, any mention of Bill Clinton’s frequent-flyer miles on the Lolita Express was dismissed as “conspiracy theory” by the same people now voting to hold him in contempt. These Democrats spent more energy defending Clinton’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein than Epstein’s lawyers did. Now they’re fleeing for the exits so fast they’re leaving skid marks on the Capitol floor. The only thing Democrats want to “turn the page” on faster is their own voter registration records.

For readers who, like Rep. Maxwell, are too young to have suffered through the Clinton years, here’s a small sample of scandals the duo has survived, limited to only those involving the presidential trouser snake. Democrats defended Clinton through:

Gennifer Flowers (1992) — “just a bimbo eruption!”

Paula Jones (1994) — “trailer park harassment.”

Monica Lewinsky (1998) — “a vast right-wing conspiracy!”

Impeachment (1998-99) — “partisan witch hunt!”

Epstein flight logs (2019) — “out of context.”

… Epstein files (2026) — turn the page!

The Clintons spent 30 years as Democratic royalty. Now, if Politico can be believed, they’re political organ donors.

Who knows what we should expect? Normally, I’d remind you not to expect prison sentences, since befriending pedophiles is distasteful but not technically illegal. But 2026 has been anything but normal. As they say at the dog track after a doping scandal, all bets are off.

I can predict one thing, though, thanks to Politico’s carefully terrified framing: Democrats are panicking about what this means for the brand. Consider the Democratic presidential lineup in living memory: Carter, Clinton, Obama, Biden. That’s the whole roster. The entire modern bench.

And now, with the fresh addition of William Jefferson Clinton, three out of four have become what we might call personas non grata — or maybe personas amnesia. One-term “Catastrophe” Carter is safely dead. Clinton is being fitted for a political body bag. Biden’s... whatever Biden is. Politically useless, at least. That only leaves Obama — and you can practically hear the nervous footsteps circling his legacy.

What happens when Obama winks out? Who do Democrats trot out at conventions as proof that their party can govern? Who cuts the ribbon? Who does the endorsement ads? At this rate, they’ll be down to dusting off Michael Dukakis. (If you have no idea who Dukakis is —and I am looking at you, Portland— that is exactly the point.)

I don’t know where this is going. But watching Democrats shove the Clintons into the volcano while pretending they barely knew them feels like the beginning of a brand implosion that will make the Bud Lite fiasco look like a bump in the road to the bar. Time will tell. """

I don’t have an X account. Has the date for the Clintons testimony been announced?

The Old Man is scheduled for February 27th. The Cunt for the 26th.

https://oversight.house.gov/re...252026%252C%25202026.

See Sigmonkey, Q got it on the first try!

Those two are old school mobsters. The boss has no one else to throw under the bus.

quote:

Originally posted by 400m:
See Sigmonkey, Q got it on the first try!

I shoulda bought a vowel or sumthin'...

quote:

“A youthful vanguard of progressive office-holders unlikely to even recall the Clinton presidency,” Politico reported, “have largely opted against defending the once formidable pair.” Representative Maxwell Frost, (D-Fla.), 28, one of the Democrats who voted to hold the Clintons in contempt, explained, “We want to be more aggressive and find the truth, and it’s less about allegiances to individuals, and more about what’s best for our party and what’s best for this country.”

Uh huh. Apparently, at least part of the Democrat Party has decided the Clintons are not what’s best for the party or the country. At last. “The party’s effective abandonment of its longtime standard bearers,” the article said, “provides a vivid illustration of how many members are eager to disassociate themselves from the Clinton brand.”

The Clintons are old, and the party has moved on to younger, progressive even more far left desires. The new leaders including Obama are driving the party into socialism funded by foreign interests. As bad as we think the Clintons are, they were never that far left when in control of the party.

Not that I wouldn't like to see them hung out in the press I just don't care, they are no longer powerful and in control. Likely nothing will happen to them since nothing ever happens to any politician that comes up in front of congress...

Get to work on the SAVE Act, fix the budget, pressure the DOJ to start making arrests of the money behind the D party.

The far left wants older politicians out, and younger more progressives in place. It's a long term game for them, and the Clintons are in the way.

Slick Willie has put a lot of miles on his...um.. odometer.

Hard to believe this clown is..




2 months younger than this Alpha: