We've discussed the #metoo and #timesup crowd here and there in other threads, but my question is specific.

Why do women ware clothes that have plunging necklines, exposed cleavage, exposed 'side boob', boobs hiked up, slits practically up to their no-no places, shorter than short skirts, clothes so tight they must be applied with a paint brush, and all the while wearing #metoo and #timesup pins???

'Sup 'wit 'dat, 'yo?

H&K-Guy

Symbolic politics has a tendency to immediately devolve into abstruse bullshit?

quote:

Originally posted by H&K-Guy:
We've discussed the #metoo and #timesup crowd here and there in other threads, but my question is specific.

Why do women ware clothes that have plunging necklines, exposed cleavage, exposed 'side boob', slits practically up to their no-no places, shorter than short skirts, clothes so tight they must be applied with a paint brush, and all the while wearing #metoo and #timesup pins???

'Sup 'wit 'dat, 'yo?

H&K-Guy

Then they get highly pissed off when some Horny guy "cops a feel".

Because they're secretly teaser's (they want you to believe they're not)?

They are supposed to be able to dress however they want without drawing any attention until the precise moment that they want it. At that time you are allowed to deliver the exact right amount of attention and no more. There is a 3 dimensional matrix somewhere that holds the solution to the equation, but men are not allowed to see it.

Because they're retards.

quote:

Originally posted by RAMIUS:
Because they're retards.

Best and most accurate answer.

I'm a little confused here.

Those tags are for anti-sexual harassment, right?

What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
I'm a little confused here.

Those tags are for anti-sexual harassment, right?

What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

Just looking may be a crime. Of course not looking may be a crime too. You just never know.

The left has spent so much time harassing ordinary men for harmless, normal behavior that they allowed true harassers and rapists off scott free.

Just wait. Eventually they will tire of destroying the careers of Hollywood types and go back to screaming at normal guys for saying hello, or not saying hello, or whatever.

Women don't understand logic or consequences.

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
I'm a little confused here.

Those tags are for anti-sexual harassment, right?

What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

It is kind of a double standard, but Jester's right. Looking is one thing, but the #metoo stuff is (allegedly, at least) about unwanted groping, kissing, innuendo, and requests/demands for sexual favors, and I think we all agree that that sort of behavior is wrong.

Just looking is a separate matter, some women object to it and some don't. My boss here is a woman, semi-hot, and always dresses in skinny jeans and tops that put her cleavage on display. It makes it hard to maintain eye contact during meetings and such, but if I were to complain about it then I'd probably be labeled a sexist pig and very possibly fired.

quote:

Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
Women don't understand logic or consequences.

Bullshit. My woman-logic dictates a man will control himself and refrain from assault or risk the consequences of how accurate I am with my favorite Walther.

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

Precisely.

quote:

Originally posted by cheesegrits:

quote:

Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
Women don't understand logic or consequences.

Bullshit. My woman-logic dictates a man will control himself and refrain from assault or risk the consequences of how accurate I am with my favorite Walther.

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

Precisely.

Cheesegrits,

As you are a woman, I ask, girls can tape their boobs to their dresses and have them almost fully exposed, and it's OK to look at them?

I always thought that starring at a woman's boobs was taboo. And then that is the point. Why display them if you don't want sexual attention?

And yes looking is different that touching.

H&K-Guy

quote:

Originally posted by H&K-Guy:
Cheesegrits,

As you are a woman, I ask, girls can tape their boobs to their dresses and have them almost fully exposed, and it's OK to look at them?

I always thought that starring at a woman's boobs was taboo. And then that is the point. Why display them if you don't want sexual attention?

And yes looking is different that touching.

H&K-Guy

Depending on who the boobs are attached to and the man's relationship to said boobs, looking can be anywhere from ok, to gauche, to taboo, to criminal. I have no idea why some women put 'em out on display if they don't want sexual attention. Breasts are sexualized in our culture no matter what other functions they may serve.

As far as dressing in revealing outfits, my opinion is that if a woman dresses for attention, she needs to be ready for both wanted and unwanted attention, including looks and/or comments that are unwelcome. Of course no one has the right to assault or touch someone else without permission, but we all know that people do bad things. Part of being a responsible adult is realizing that your behavior can have unintended consequences, especially if there are bad people around. Wearing a low cut top, getting falling down drunk, and stumbling around alone is a choice. A consequence of that choice is that a woman puts herself in greater danger of being assaulted. The feminists scream bloody murder at that. Bottom line: men shouldn't commit sexual assault, but women are fools if they think they can go though life with a blithe indifference about their personal safety based on the assumption that "shouldn't happen" means "won't happen."

No complaints here! I like looking! And yes I have no problem controlling myself.

quote:

Originally posted by Expert308:

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
I'm a little confused here.

Those tags are for anti-sexual harassment, right?

What difference does it make what they're wearing? They could be naked and people still need to keep their fuckin hands to themselves.

Now if we're talking about just looking, that's a different story.

It is kind of a double standard, but Jester's right. Looking is one thing, but the #metoo stuff is (allegedly, at least) about unwanted groping, kissing, innuendo, and requests/demands for sexual favors, and I think we all agree that that sort of behavior is wrong.

Just looking is a separate matter, some women object to it and some don't. My boss here is a woman, semi-hot, and always dresses in skinny jeans and tops that put her cleavage on display. It makes it hard to maintain eye contact during meetings and such, but if I were to complain about it then I'd probably be labeled a sexist pig and very possibly fired.

FWIW the #metoo crowd have also listed looking as bad. Here is one of the "sexually inappropriate" allegations made against Trump:
Miss Teen USA Contestants (1997)

The allegation: Five women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA claimed Trump, who owned the pageant, walked in on them while they were changing.

“It was certainly the most inappropriate time to meet us all for the first time,” said Victoria Hughes, the former Miss New Mexico Teen USA. “The youngest girl was 15, and I was the eldest at 19.”

On The Howard Stern Show, Trump admitted to “inspecting” the contestants backstage. It wasn’t clear if he was referring to the Miss USA pageant, or the contest for teens.

“You know, I’m inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good,” he said. “You know, the dresses. ‘Is everyone okay?’ You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody okay?’ And you see these incredible-looking women, and so, I sort of get away with things like that.”

And yet these Hollywood whores continue to present themselves as walking sets of tits, engaging in hashtag slacktivism targeting an entire gender with shame while only naming the media approved male scapegoats in Hollywood. I stand by my statement.

Go spend time of the beaches of southern France and elsewhere similar. Women there often wear barely enough to blow one’s nose on, and nobody has a problem controlling themselves that I’ve ever heard of.

They are used to it.