SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Pet Insurance Companies
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Pet Insurance Companies Login/Join 
Chip away the stone
Picture of rusbro
posted
I've got one 2.5 year old dog, and want to get health insurance for him, as he's around a lot of other dogs 5 days a week in doggy daycare, and therefore exposed to more potential for illness and injury than your average house dog.

So far my google searches for reviews seem to be all over the place, with one site rating one company a the best, and another rating it the worst.

Any recommendations?
 
Posts: 11597 | Registered: August 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Now in Florida
Picture of ChicagoSigMan
posted Hide Post
Don't have a specific company to recommend. Just make sure to get a complete schedule of premiums, not just the initial year you sign up. Pet insurance premiums escalate very quickly as the dog ages.
 
Posts: 6084 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Would you like
a sandwich?
Picture of Dreamerx4
posted Hide Post
I would ask my vet personally. They will know who is legit, and who is a waste of time.

Good luck!



 
Posts: 1044 | Location: Virginia | Registered: October 29, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of konata88
posted Hide Post
I used VPI. They were easy to use and without problem when my dog had health issues.

They even paid for cremation services after the fact (I didn't even know it was covered) - they just told me that they would pay for it.

If/when I get a dog again, I would get VPI. YMMV.




"Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it." L.Tolstoy
"A government is just a body of people, usually, notably, ungoverned." Shepherd Book
 
Posts: 13300 | Location: In the gilded cage | Registered: December 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Better Than I Deserve!
Picture of LBTRS
posted Hide Post
We've had Healthy Paws for a couple years on our two. They had the best reviews and prices for the coverage I wanted.

A quick current search indicates they continue to have excellent reviews.

I have always said I would not spend tens of thousands of dollars on pet medical care and by having insurance it keeps me from ever having to actually make that decision.


____________________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
GOA Life Member
Arizona Citizens Defense League Life Member
 
Posts: 4991 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: September 23, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
There is no need. This is yet another scam, imho. If your pet is healthy, has current vaccines and no predisposing conditions, there is simply no need for it. Put the money you’d pay into a premium into a bank account, and save it for a rainy day.
Disclaimer: I’m a cvt that’s been in and out of practice for over 20 years. I’ve never had health insurance for my pets, and don’t plan to.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5596 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Better Than I Deserve!
Picture of LBTRS
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
There is no need. This is yet another scam, imho. If your pet is healthy, has current vaccines and no predisposing conditions, there is simply no need for it. Put the money you’d pay into a premium into a bank account, and save it for a rainy day.
Disclaimer: I’m a cvt that’s been in and out of practice for over 20 years. I’ve never had health insurance for my pets, and don’t plan to.


It is insurance, how is it a scam? That is like saying health insurance on your family is a scam. It is just what it says it is and people need to decide if they want to take on all the risk that a pet may become ill or pay the price to have insurance take on some of the risk.

I understand you not wanting it but to say it is a scam is not being accurate.


____________________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
GOA Life Member
Arizona Citizens Defense League Life Member
 
Posts: 4991 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: September 23, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
In my experience it doesn't pay for itself.

I had a healthy dog, but some minor injuries and illnesses. The coverage was not like our own health insurance - felt more like a dental plan, where you pay a premium for discounts on future services. I suppose if there were more severe injuries or illnesses this would different.
 
Posts: 5906 | Location: Denver, CO | Registered: September 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
For every $1.00 that you pay in premiums for this, remember: that's seven bucks in doggie dollars.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31777 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of K0ZZZ
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LBTRS:
We've had Healthy Paws for a couple years on our two. They had the best reviews and prices for the coverage I wanted.

A quick current search indicates they continue to have excellent reviews.

I have always said I would not spend tens of thousands of dollars on pet medical care and by having insurance it keeps me from ever having to actually make that decision.



I also have Healthy Paws for the current pup. Haven't had to use it yet thankfully, the price seems reasonable, and the same, they've been top rated in a lot of reviews.


... Chad



http://shotworkspro.com - Much better than scrap paper!
 
Posts: 786 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: December 14, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of valkyrie1
posted Hide Post
We use ASPCA for insurance and it's payed off for us. All our previous dogs had very expensive surgeries so we figured with our rescue mutt we would try it. They have been a little slow in refunds but they have payed our vet bills off. Both the wife and I are pleased with their service.
 
Posts: 2369 | Location: Florida | Registered: March 01, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LBTRS:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
There is no need. This is yet another scam, imho. If your pet is healthy, has current vaccines and no predisposing conditions, there is simply no need for it. Put the money you’d pay into a premium into a bank account, and save it for a rainy day.
Disclaimer: I’m a cvt that’s been in and out of practice for over 20 years. I’ve never had health insurance for my pets, and don’t plan to.


It is insurance, how is it a scam? That is like saying health insurance on your family is a scam. It is just what it says it is and people need to decide if they want to take on all the risk that a pet may become ill or pay the price to have insurance take on some of the risk.

I understand you not wanting it but to say it is a scam is not being accurate.


Health ins for humans is a scam as well, imho. Perhaps a better term would be a shell game. You pay hundreds a month on the off chance that you might some day need it. You’re playing the odds, gambling, betting, if you will. And if and when you do lose, insurances typically try and find a way to still make you pay some portion, if not trying to deny it outright.
So for humans you’re paying out thousands a year. On the possiblility that you “might” need it. They are feeding into your fear, and you typically don’t get a return on what you’ve paid in (unless you have a preexisting condition, in which case your rate is jacked up already, or they simply won’t insure you).
I work with insurance claims almost every day, and see how often claims are denied for inappropriate reasons, or flat out dishonesty. I’ve watched patients get jerked around by the fine print on the policy, when the insurer understood the intent of the person purchasing. They simply hope you won’t follow up, and just pay the bill. Part of my job is to pursue those misajudicated claims and make ins companies actually responsible for what they say they will do- holding them to their words and the intent.
It breaks my heart to see people taken advantage of when it comes to their pets. There really isn’t any reason (again, imho) that people should have insurance for their pets - most pets are healthy enough (with vaccinations and proper care) and have a reasonable life span that there is no need to pay anyone for “insurance” on their pet’s health. It’s a gambit, a sheeple move, and unnecessary. I’m amazed people are actually getting behind this movement of paying for pet insurance. I also suspect it’s relatively unregulated, but this I don’t know for sure. I deal in people insurance, but I’d advise against pet insurance (catastrophic I get, esp if you have a breed with known issues, but I feel everyone should be able to manage a routine health visit for their pet- goes with the responsibility of ownership).
This is just my humble opinion. Ymmv.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5596 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:

Health ins for humans is a scam as well, imho. Perhaps a better term would be a shell game. You pay hundreds a month on the off chance that you might some day need it.
  • February 2010: I had massive rectal bleeding / hemorrhaging. Hospitalized for just over a week while they tried to figure out what was going on, where the blood loss was originating. Many expensive diagnostic procedures. Finally decided it was diverticulosis. Over a week in hospital.

  • Later same year: Lab work in the incident above showed PSA levels in the 20s. Anything above 4 is suspect. Yup, prostate cancer. Scope, biopsies, implants to serve as targets for radiation, couple months of daily radiation.

  • May, 2013: Missed a step getting out of cargo area in rear of our delivery truck, crashed to the roadwa. Ambulance to hospital, 24 hours in ER, surgery to implant bracing rods in fractured hip / thigh, rest of the week in hospital, month and a half in residential rehab center, months of outpatien physical therapy.

  • December 2016: Guillain Barré Syndrome. Spinal taps to verify. Week in hospital, IVIG transfusions, followed by couple months outpatient physical therapy.
My total cost for all of above: ZERO! Not one penny. Everything covered by insurance. I would be bankrupt right now, if I had to pay for this.

Oh yeah -- 2017, cataract surgery with IOL implants for both eyes. My cost, $45.00 for post-precdure eye drops for each eye, plus another $45.00 for exam for new prescription for glasses. A year later, YAG capsulotomy, each eye. No cost to me.

Office visits twice yearly with Primary doc, follow up visits with urology / oncology docs re prostate cancer, all completely covered by insurance, cost to me: ZERO.

Yes, I have been paying premiums. Two hundred bucks / month. Well worth it to me for this "scam."



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31777 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:

Health ins for humans is a scam as well, imho. Perhaps a better term would be a shell game. You pay hundreds a month on the off chance that you might some day need it.
  • February 2010: I had massive rectal bleeding / hemorrhaging. Hospitalized for just over a week while they tried to figure out what was going on, where the blood loss was originating. Many expensive diagnostic procedures. Finally decided it was diverticulosis. Over a week in hospital.

  • Later same year: Lab work in the incident above showed PSA levels in the 20s. Anything above 4 is suspect. Yup, prostate cancer. Scope, biopsies, implants to serve as targets for radiation, couple months of daily radiation.

  • May, 2013: Missed a step getting out of cargo area in rear of our delivery truck, crashed to the roadwa. Ambulance to hospital, 24 hours in ER, surgery to implant bracing rods in fractured hip / thigh, rest of the week in hospital, month and a half in residential rehab center, months of outpatien physical therapy.

  • December 2016: Guillain Barré Syndrome. Spinal taps to verify. Week in hospital, IVIG transfusions, followed by couple months outpatient physical therapy.
My total cost for all of above: ZERO! Not one penny. Everything covered by insurance. I would be bankrupt right now, if I had to pay for this.

Oh yeah -- 2017, cataract surgery with IOL implants for both eyes. My cost, $45.00 for post-precdure eye drops for each eye, plus another $45.00 for exam for new prescription for glasses. A year later, YAG capsulotomy, each eye. No cost to me.

Office visits twice yearly with Primary doc, follow up visits with urology / oncology docs re prostate cancer, all completely covered by insurance, cost to me: ZERO.

Yes, I have been paying premiums. Two hundred bucks / month. Well worth it to me for this "scam."


Those are the lowest monthly premiums I’ve heard of in recent years. And as I said, ymmv. You are certainly at an age where the odds pay off. I’m glad you never had to pay a penny.
What I see are greatly inflated prices from hospitals due to insurance write offs.. someone has to pay the piper, and what used to be reasonable pricing by doctors and hospitals is now out of control, in great part due to insurance companies. Depends on who they screw. It’s either the individual or the provider. Example, I was recently in the hospital for less than 1 day. Quoted by the doc, approx 10,000-20,000. Bill came from the hospital for 114,000. I wasn’t in the hospital for more than 15 hours. I didn’t have major surgery, and walked out at day’s end. The provider in that case ate a HUGE amount, but billed it to try and get a reasonable reimbursement for their work.
Regardless, I still believe pet insurance is unnecessary for pets with owners that manage their health. I think pet insurance companies prey on the worries of doting owners, but as this is getting off topic to the OP request, turning into an argument where all he wanted was advice, I’ll bow out. We will have to agree to disagree. My 2 cents are in. Smile


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5596 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Chip away the stone
Picture of rusbro
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the replies so far.

If he was just a healthy house-dog, I'd not consider insurance, but 5 days a week he plays rough with a bunch of other dogs for hours each day, and shares water bowls with them. These things do from time to time cause medical issues for him. I'm pretty confident in this instance insurance from a reliable provider will be a wise investment.
 
Posts: 11597 | Registered: August 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of valkyrie1
posted Hide Post
All I know ASPCA paid back over 4k on multiple issues for my rescue,We give her the best of food,the best of care. Just recently she had a bad reaction to a bee sting where we almost lost her. So far it's been worth it.
 
Posts: 2369 | Location: Florida | Registered: March 01, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Better Than I Deserve!
Picture of LBTRS
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
quote:
Originally posted by LBTRS:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
There is no need. This is yet another scam, imho. If your pet is healthy, has current vaccines and no predisposing conditions, there is simply no need for it. Put the money you’d pay into a premium into a bank account, and save it for a rainy day.
Disclaimer: I’m a cvt that’s been in and out of practice for over 20 years. I’ve never had health insurance for my pets, and don’t plan to.


It is insurance, how is it a scam? That is like saying health insurance on your family is a scam. It is just what it says it is and people need to decide if they want to take on all the risk that a pet may become ill or pay the price to have insurance take on some of the risk.

I understand you not wanting it but to say it is a scam is not being accurate.


Health ins for humans is a scam as well, imho. Perhaps a better term would be a shell game. You pay hundreds a month on the off chance that you might some day need it. You’re playing the odds, gambling, betting, if you will. And if and when you do lose, insurances typically try and find a way to still make you pay some portion, if not trying to deny it outright.
So for humans you’re paying out thousands a year. On the possiblility that you “might” need it. They are feeding into your fear, and you typically don’t get a return on what you’ve paid in (unless you have a preexisting condition, in which case your rate is jacked up already, or they simply won’t insure you).
I work with insurance claims almost every day, and see how often claims are denied for inappropriate reasons, or flat out dishonesty. I’ve watched patients get jerked around by the fine print on the policy, when the insurer understood the intent of the person purchasing. They simply hope you won’t follow up, and just pay the bill. Part of my job is to pursue those misajudicated claims and make ins companies actually responsible for what they say they will do- holding them to their words and the intent.
It breaks my heart to see people taken advantage of when it comes to their pets. There really isn’t any reason (again, imho) that people should have insurance for their pets - most pets are healthy enough (with vaccinations and proper care) and have a reasonable life span that there is no need to pay anyone for “insurance” on their pet’s health. It’s a gambit, a sheeple move, and unnecessary. I’m amazed people are actually getting behind this movement of paying for pet insurance. I also suspect it’s relatively unregulated, but this I don’t know for sure. I deal in people insurance, but I’d advise against pet insurance (catastrophic I get, esp if you have a breed with known issues, but I feel everyone should be able to manage a routine health visit for their pet- goes with the responsibility of ownership).
This is just my humble opinion. Ymmv.


Most pet insurance policies don't cover "routine health visits". I'm questioning how much you really know about this?

I pay $37.11/month on my pup for 90% coverage and a $250 annual deductible. I have it for accidents and illnesses that are not routine. None of my routine health vists are covered under this policy but almost all accidents and illnesses are.

While I have not had to use it the reviews from people that have are very positive for Healthy Paws.


____________________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
GOA Life Member
Arizona Citizens Defense League Life Member
 
Posts: 4991 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: September 23, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LBTRS:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
quote:
Originally posted by LBTRS:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
There is no need. This is yet another scam, imho. If your pet is healthy, has current vaccines and no predisposing conditions, there is simply no need for it. Put the money you’d pay into a premium into a bank account, and save it for a rainy day.
Disclaimer: I’m a cvt that’s been in and out of practice for over 20 years. I’ve never had health insurance for my pets, and don’t plan to.


It is insurance, how is it a scam? That is like saying health insurance on your family is a scam. It is just what it says it is and people need to decide if they want to take on all the risk that a pet may become ill or pay the price to have insurance take on some of the risk.

I understand you not wanting it but to say it is a scam is not being accurate.


Health ins for humans is a scam as well, imho. Perhaps a better term would be a shell game. You pay hundreds a month on the off chance that you might some day need it. You’re playing the odds, gambling, betting, if you will. And if and when you do lose, insurances typically try and find a way to still make you pay some portion, if not trying to deny it outright.
So for humans you’re paying out thousands a year. On the possiblility that you “might” need it. They are feeding into your fear, and you typically don’t get a return on what you’ve paid in (unless you have a preexisting condition, in which case your rate is jacked up already, or they simply won’t insure you).
I work with insurance claims almost every day, and see how often claims are denied for inappropriate reasons, or flat out dishonesty. I’ve watched patients get jerked around by the fine print on the policy, when the insurer understood the intent of the person purchasing. They simply hope you won’t follow up, and just pay the bill. Part of my job is to pursue those misajudicated claims and make ins companies actually responsible for what they say they will do- holding them to their words and the intent.
It breaks my heart to see people taken advantage of when it comes to their pets. There really isn’t any reason (again, imho) that people should have insurance for their pets - most pets are healthy enough (with vaccinations and proper care) and have a reasonable life span that there is no need to pay anyone for “insurance” on their pet’s health. It’s a gambit, a sheeple move, and unnecessary. I’m amazed people are actually getting behind this movement of paying for pet insurance. I also suspect it’s relatively unregulated, but this I don’t know for sure. I deal in people insurance, but I’d advise against pet insurance (catastrophic I get, esp if you have a breed with known issues, but I feel everyone should be able to manage a routine health visit for their pet- goes with the responsibility of ownership).
This is just my humble opinion. Ymmv.


Most pet insurance policies don't cover "routine health visits". I'm questioning how much you really know about this?

I pay $37.11/month on my pup for 90% coverage and a $250 annual deductible. I have it for accidents and illnesses that are not routine. None of my routine health vists are covered under this policy but almost all accidents and illnesses are.

While I have not had to use it the reviews from people that have are very positive for Healthy Paws.


<sigh>. Key in “routine pet coverage” in your search engine. For me, with google, the first 5 that popped were routine visits for your pet being covered by pet insurance. Petfirst, AKC, etc.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5596 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Laugh or Die
posted Hide Post
When I got health insurance for my dog a few years ago the premium went up THIRTY percent after the first year. It was a highly recommended company, Embrace, via USAA. I had not made a single claim in that year. I was extraordinarily disappointed and immediately canceled. Do the Healthy Paws premiums go up like that each year?


________________________________________________
 
Posts: 10219 | Location: NC | Registered: May 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Better Than I Deserve!
Picture of LBTRS
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
<sigh>. Key in “routine pet coverage” in your search engine. For me, with google, the first 5 that popped were routine visits for your pet being covered by pet insurance. Petfirst, AKC, etc.


Lol, I went to the first company you listed (Petfirst) and it says specifically "Routine wellness and preventative treatment are not covered" and nothing on the list of what is covered is a "routine" procedure.

You're giving advice on something you seem to know little about.

The $37.11 I pay each month for this coverage ensures I never have to decide if I'm willing to pay $10,000 for an accident or illness for my pup. I'm good with that.


____________________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member
GOA Life Member
Arizona Citizens Defense League Life Member
 
Posts: 4991 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: September 23, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Pet Insurance Companies

© SIGforum 2024