quote:

Originally posted by PASig:
Has the tide finally turned with this silly masking bullshit at medical facilities who have been thus far to my experience the lone holdouts still enforcing it?

Had a yearly sleep center appointment to go over my CPAP and how it’s been going and they had “Masks Are Optional” signs up which was a good sign to me.

Maybe the tide IS finally turning

They are still masking in the hospitals and healthcare facilities here. I saw a woman sitting in a truck at a grocery store parking spot with her mask on. She was in the spot waiting for her groceries to be delivered to the truck. I’m thinking she was saving herself from herself. Then the grocery cart full of groceries get delivered, she takes off her mask and goes out and helps the store employee load the groceries standing a foot away from the employee. You just can’t fix it!

I dread having to go for my colonoscopy at the end of this month, I’m afraid refusing to wear a mask will result in the diameter of the scope to increase by 400%.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right
By Robin Koerner

https://brownstone.org/article...inated-got-it-right/

Good article, thanks.

Today at the Yooper grocery store, the 20 something cashier was masked. And she took it down to talk to me.

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right
By Robin Koerner

https://brownstone.org/article...inated-got-it-right/

Good article, thanks.

Good article and if you go to the listed video of Scott Adams that was a good hr to spend watching it.

^^^^

IDK; I didn’t comply with masking and I ain’t no looka

Seriously though, I firmly believe that the forced masking after terrifying folks with ridiculous death rates created a lot of mental illness that’s hard for some to drop and move on with their lives.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
^^^^

IDK; I didn’t comply with masking and I ain’t no looka

Seriously though, I firmly believe that the forced masking after terrifying folks with ridiculous death rates created a lot of mental illness that’s hard for some to drop and move on with their lives.

We went on a 90 minute guided full moon snow shoe outing with about 15 people plus the guide. A family of 4 was masked the whole time. Outside, in the fresh air, with as much room to distance from others as you'd like.

Poor kids.

They were wearing high quality N95s, and inside I am inclined to allow the possibility a family member has a medical situation, so if they leave me alone it isn't my business. But outside it just shows their obedience to their cult.

Please pray for my son who has been effected by this plandemic. As a pharmacist he did not take the shot would not administer the shot and told all not to take it. He is going through hell because of all this. It truly has been a hardship for his family

quote:

Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:
Please pray for my son who has been effected by this plandemic. As a pharmacist he did not take the shot would not administer the shot and told all not to take it. He is going through hell because of all this. It truly has been a hardship for his family

This is sad but par for the course today. He's not alone.

RMD

quote:

Originally posted by rduckwor:


This is sad but par for the course today. He's not alone.

RMD

So true, I believe that the purge of military, government, government sub contractors, doctors, nurses, really all across the work place spectrum of people who think independently and not willing to knuckle down to their bullshit are all paying a heavy price.

This all reminds me of the Left Behind series where those who would not take the mark of the beast were hunted down and not allowed to participate in commerce.

quote:

So true, I believe that the purge of military, government, government sub contractors, doctors, nurses, really all across the work place spectrum of people who think independently and not willing to knuckle down to their bullshit are all paying a heavy price.

I will pray for your son.
My wife (healthcare), daughter (.gov), and son-in-law (Navy) are experiencing similar treatment.

quote:

Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:
Please pray for my son who has been effected by this plandemic. As a pharmacist he did not take the shot would not administer the shot and told all not to take it. He is going through hell because of all this. It truly has been a hardship for his family

Don't worry at the current "suddenly died" rates there won't be many left to chastise them.

I think they'll be vindicated.

quote:

Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:
Please pray for my son who has been effected by this plandemic. As a pharmacist he did not take the shot would not administer the shot and told all not to take it. He is going through hell because of all this. It truly has been a hardship for his family

He is a hero.

I believe the death and serious injury rate of the mrna jabs is already greater than the true rate from the virus itself. Every person not jabbed because of your son is better off for it.

This is big enough that in the end the truth cannot be hidden. The process is agonizingly slow but eventually people like your son will be vindicated.

quote:

He is a hero.

I believe the death and serious injury rate of the mrna jabs is already greater than the true rate from the virus itself. Every person not jabbed because of your son is better off for it.

He is a hero.

A simple database of death-vax records should be made publicly available by the CDC and other health authorities worldwide.

The death-vax records can be analyzed in seconds using a variety of totally objective methods to show whether the COVID vaccines have increased or decreased all-cause mortality in each age range.

No medical records, cause of death, etc. are required or needed. Just the age, date of death, and dates of vaccination are all that is required for each death since the start of the COVID vaccination program.

The death-vax data has been collected, but it has never been made publicly available anywhere in the world. There is no PII or HIPAA violation by disclosing the records.

There is absolutely no excuse for this data not to be made PUBLICLY available now.

https://stevekirsch.substack.c...or-data-transparency

I haven't viewed any of Dr. Campbell's videos in months and something which jumps out at me immediately is the static he must be getting from youtube and other platforms where his videos may be published. There is a change in his demeanor to something less cordial, and the posters you see behind him are a clue as well.

The big tech censors who still at this late date seek to suppress the truth are turning even the mild mannered among us into militants.

Draconian Covid restrictions are being lifted left and right, but the war isn’t over yet. They are still trying hide the damage they’ve done- both with the obvious concern over hidden vaccine damage, and the attack on rights and personal decision making. As a result of the latter, a goodly chunk of the population has accepted being thought for, rather than using intelligence and the ability to think for themselves. Whether out of trust in a corrupt administration, laziness, or for political reasons, those people were weaponized against fellow citizens. Division is democRAT bedrock.

Two months ago, Tracy Beanz published an article in UncoverDC starting with this sobering statement: “The Missouri v. Biden case will go down in history as one of the most important civil liberties cases ever tried in a United States court.”

I agree with Tracy.

This will probably make someone’s head explode, but Missouri v. Biden is more important than Brown v. Board of Education. It’s more important than Plessy v. Ferguson or Washington v. Davis.

It’s so important that in a rational world, we’d get daily updates from every major media channel about the lawsuit, every middle and high schooler would be required to watch weekly videos about it, and there’d be daily panels of “expert” talking heads on every TV network (and social media channel) yammering away about every microscopic development in the case.

But since we live in Clown World, none of that stuff is happening. Plus — of course — it’s all disinformation anyway, and the federal government has banned disinformation, just like paper grocery bags. Or wait, are paper bags back now because of the turtles? It’s so hard to remember.

Anyway, it is past time to focus on this lawsuit of lawsuits.

The States of Missouri and Louisiana filed the case on May 5th, 2022. At the time, the states were represented by Solicitors General Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry, respectively. I like to call it, “Show Me versus Shut Up!”

Although the list of defendants subsequently expanded — greatly expanded — here’s the original much shorter list from the first complaint. All these folks were sued in their official capacities: Joe Biden, Jen Psaki, Vivek Murthy, Xavier Bacerra, the Department of HHS, Anthony Fauci, NIAID, CDC, Alejandro Mayorkas, the Department of Homeland Security, Jen Easterly, the CISA, and Nina Jankowicz.

You probably recognize all of those names except maybe CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), Jen Easterly (Director of CISA), and Nina Jankowicz (the singing, short-term director of the DHS’ Disinformation Governance Board, who previously worked for Ukraine’s puppet-president Zelenskyy, and I am not making that up).

To give you some flavor, here’s the very first paragraph from the 84-page Missouri complaint:

In 1783, George Washington warned that if “the Freedom of Speech may be taken away,” then “dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.” George Washington, Address to the Officers of the Army (March 15, 1783). The freedom of speech in the United States now faces one of its greatest assaults by federal government officials in the Nation’s history.

Old George wasn’t wrong, either. Just look at what’s happened over the last three years. Sheep to the Slaughter, indeed.

While I have often seen surgical hyperbole used in lawsuits before, I don’t think Missouri v. Biden’s first paragraph is overstating the case. Future generations will study this case, considering it a critical turning point in the Nation’s history, whatever the outcome.

The lawsuit’s subject is how the government violated Americans’ First Amendment rights by censoring people during the pandemic. It’s that simple. Or, it SHOULD BE that simple. The plaintiffs argue that the government both DIRECTLY censored Americans and especially, INDIRECTLY censored them through bullying, bribing, hectoring, nagging, and setting up one-way “partnerships” with big tech companies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

The case has been running for nine months now and as of this morning, there are 184 entries on the docket. No trial date has been set. In my experience, that’s about middling docket activity for a lawsuit with so many parties. So far, almost all the action in the case has been over discovery, both paper discovery and oral depositions, which the plaintiffs have been enthusiastically pursuing with passion and verve.

Meanwhile, the government has been doing everything that IT can to obstruct, delay, and obfuscate. It has objected to nearly every discovery request, requiring a plethora of hearings and rulings, and the case has even been to the Supreme Court — more than once! — over discovery disputes.

Most recently, the Supreme Court had to weigh in on whether the plaintiffs would be allowed to take Jen Psaki’s deposition AT ALL. The government argued she is too important and too busy for deposition, even though she doesn’t work there anymore. Most commenters missed how unique was the Supreme Court’s involvement in this argument. Normally, even district court judges consider discovery disputes too pedestrian to clog up their docket, and often assign those kinds of arguments to lower-status clerical judges called magistrates.

Not this time.

Read more here:
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com...ack&utm_medium=email

A piece by Paul Offitt in the New England journal of Medicine.

Closing paragraph:

"Fortunately, SARS-CoV-2 variants haven’t evolved to resist the protection against severe disease offered by vaccination or previous infection. If that happens, we will need to create a variant-specific vaccine. Although boosting with a bivalent vaccine is likely to have a similar effect as boosting with a monovalent vaccine, booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised. In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later. "

It is a good article outlining all the machinations of the vaccine chase to capture the immunity against the variants and why it might have failed.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/...y=infectious-disease

RMD

The push back seems to be heating up, which suggests to me that there will be a concerted effort by .gov, pharma and the MSM to slam the door. They'll cook and reveal what suits them and suppress anything that is truth.