And add to the fact that 500 million yahoo accounts were hacked in 2014...

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/2...y/yahoo-data-breach/

quote:

Originally posted by braillediver:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
This is an article by Jerome Corsi. He can be controversial, but he brings up a point I never thought of before.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/yah...hillary-huma-emails/


Abedin sent State Dept emails to her yahoo account. She says to print them. May have been tens of thousands of emails.

Corsi says if Abedin gave anyone her account name and password, people could have read the emails she sent from any of her email accounts to her Yahoo account.

Does that sound right ?

As background, it is common practice in DoD to have a special card that must be inserted in a card reader to access your govt email acct. Clinton by passed all that type of security by going to private accounts. (To be "transparent" as they like to say, State Dept IT security was one of the worst in the federal govt)

Add to this her yahoo email account seems to have been here name- No one would have thought to hack that right?

Corsi is suggesting something much darker than a hacker.

He is noting that Abedin could have provided anyone w her account name and PW, and then they could read all the State Dept email that she copied to her Yahoo acct.

That would have been invisible to the State Dept and the Clinton Foundation server operations.

Anyone in the world.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Corsi is suggesting something much darker than a hacker.

He is noting that Abedin could have provided anyone w her account name and PW, and then they could read all the State Dept email that she copied to her Yahoo acct.

That would have been invisible to the State Dept and the Clinton Foundation server operations.

Anyone in the world.

And so goes the bus over Huma-the-spy. Now it'll be poor ol' Hillary, done in by a spy! See, it wasn't her fault, it was Huma!...

No one knows what's in these emails: except Huma, Carlos Danger, and Sydney Leathers.............

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Corsi is suggesting something much darker than a hacker.

He is noting that Abedin could have provided anyone w her account name and PW, and then they could read all the State Dept email that she copied to her Yahoo acct.

That would have been invisible to the State Dept and the Clinton Foundation server operations.

Anyone in the world.

And so goes the bus over Huma-the-spy. Now it'll be poor ol' Hillary, done in by a spy! See, it wasn't her fault, it was Huma!...

That defense won't work - even if it were true. "My closest confidante and aide, my future Chief of Staff in the White House, the woman who was like a second daughter to me.....was a spy." That would be the end of Hillary.

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Corsi is suggesting something much darker than a hacker.

He is noting that Abedin could have provided anyone w her account name and PW, and then they could read all the State Dept email that she copied to her Yahoo acct.

That would have been invisible to the State Dept and the Clinton Foundation server operations.

Anyone in the world.

And so goes the bus over Huma-the-spy. Now it'll be poor ol' Hillary, done in by a spy! See, it wasn't her fault, it was Huma!...

Huma has been around the Clintons for about twenty years, has seen a lot of their dirty deals & knows how they operate. She hasn't kept her job as The Hag's top advisor for all these years because she's stupid. I'd be willing to bet that she has an "insurance policy" stashed in some lawyer's safe somewhere.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
I guess we're still waiting on the wikileaks phase III release.

Come on, man! Get on with it!

On one hand, WikiLeaks might have a hard time topping recent FBI activity.

On the other hand, WikiLeaks III is imminent whereas it might be weeks before the FBI's findings are released.

On the third hand, Clinton might claim that WikiLeaks material is bogus, but that claim won't fly with material from the Weiner/Abedin laptop.

It was on the news this morning that Huma used that Laptop to back up her phone emails.. So there could be a lot of them..

Sure hope Huma doesn't have an "accident" but I wouldn't be surprised.

These media people are shameless.

Listening to the radio, the entire blurb about the investigation was explaining how Harry Reid says that Comey may have broken federal law in announcing it and how former attorney general Eric Holder and several former DOJ officials had written an op ed questioning the decision since it could impact an election.

They are in full blown, panic, spin-at-all-costs mode.

Piers Morgan gets it…

https://www.google.com/amp/www...ma-Bill-Hillary.html

The Dems know they are fucked well beyond this election.

Hillary learned nothing at all from Watergate and the Dems, regrettably, know it and she will take them all down. Even if she wins, the investigations and questions will go on and eventually, I believe, the House will move to impeach her when it becomes patently obvious that DOJ is stalling to protect her or refuses to appoint a Special Prosecutor.

Once she leaves off the Dems will lose power for a decade or more. Minimum.

That's what they fear.

Dont confuse stupidity with hubris.

None of these people are stupid. Arrogant beyond comprehension...? Yes. Stupid? Not on your life. They operate within a world where the "normal rules" dont apply. But above all, they value their own skin. Its human nature. Give a mother a choice between never seeing their child or singing a show tune...and watch them clear their throat and pick up their best note.

You watch.

quote:

Originally posted by entropy:
Dont confuse stupidity with hubris.

None of these people are stupid. Arrogant beyond comprehension...? Yes. Stupid? Not on your life.

I disagree. These asshole are morons. Keystone Kriminals. They make it up as they go along.

If they were so smart, NOBODY would have a clue to their lying and their crimes.

Seems like they're somewhere in between: smart enough to set up foundations and insulate themselves from direct contact, but too stupid and arrogant to see that it's not working.

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:

quote:

Originally posted by entropy:
Dont confuse stupidity with hubris.

None of these people are stupid. Arrogant beyond comprehension...? Yes. Stupid? Not on your life.

I disagree. These asshole are morons. Keystone Kriminals. They make it up as they go along.

If they were so smart, NOBODY would have a clue to their lying and their crimes.

They get careless from time to time, but that is natural when they are juggling SO MANY criminal/corrupt activities. The Hag is very intelligent and crafty - that is how both of them stayed out of jail for so many years despite the ever-increasing pile of evidence and (literal) dead bodies they leave in their wake. It was just a matter of time. Their hubris caused them to continue their activities to the point where it couldn't be ignored, anymore (like a gambler on a losing streak who doesn't know when to walk away from the table).

Now, her unsecure server thing was pretty stupid; but that is probably due to their lack of understanding about even basic computer/network security protocols (and the knowledge that most people wouldn't care or dare to investigate it). And this network thing was just ONE part of her many misdeads at State - she had Benghazi to botch, foreign influence to trade, and all the other stuff (including, I'm sure, a LOT of stuff we don't know about yet). You can be smart and careless at the same time. Nobody is infallible.

president sparklemuffin is a complete idiot; the clintons are not.

Frank, I wish you would separate your SIGline somehow...

quote:

Originally posted by FrankMoses:
Seems like they're somewhere in between: smart enough to set up foundations and insulate themselves from direct contact, but too stupid and arrogant to see that it's not working.

Look at it this way. They're good at getting out of trouble, which makes them smart (or at least means that they've had a lot of practice), but they suck at not getting into trouble, which makes them stupid. That nets out to their just bright enough to be kinda stupid for the rest of their lives.

And yeah, it would be good if you were to put that signature line down below the divider.

Has anyone suggested that this election is polarizing? Part of what makes a democracy viable is the tradition of still being able to work with election opponents after a win or loss. This time and with the answers I'm seeing, that might be difficult for us. Notice I blame us, not the commies. Understand we both hate each others guts. But they, the commies, will be more than willing to work with us. They basically need us to provide financing for THEIR deplorable life styles.

Except the image they've painted of us all being rich and not paying enough taxes is false. There are just as many wealthy Democrats as there are Republicans and independents. So I don't know if its a class issue or them just wanting power. Or maybe us out of power.

And I don't really know if she's the most corrupt person ever to run for the presidency or not. Lyndon was pretty scummy.

Now I wonder what happened to wikileaks. They're due and not coming through with their promise. I view her email scandal as knocking her to the ground. But I want Wikileaks to put a stake through her heart, if they can find one.

And I keep looking up at the thread title. Consider how far this thread has drifted, if you will. Sure, we're concerned with her criminality, but now we're seeing the other branches of government rallying to her side. They want her and Obama to remain in power to protect their sleezy jobs. When Trump says he wants to drain the swamp, maybe we need to understand there's a whole lot that needs draining.

quote:

Originally posted by rburg:

And I don't really know if she's the most corrupt person ever to run for the presidency or not. Lyndon was pretty scummy.

Seriously, dawg?

There ain't any one who can hold a candle to this broad when it comes to corruption.