SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Can Radar Detectors Now Filter Out In-Vehicle Radars?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Can Radar Detectors Now Filter Out In-Vehicle Radars? Login/Join 
Eschew Obfuscation
posted
I bought an Escort Passport Max a couple of years ago but stopped using it after a couple of months because I was getting constant false alarms from in-vehicle radars (lane departure, blind spot, collision avoidance).

I looked at both Escort and Valentine One today and both now claim that their products can detect and filter out these in-vehicle radar systems.

Is this true, or just marketing hype?


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gone but Together Again.
Dad & Uncle
Picture of h2oys
posted Hide Post
"No", its not just hype from Valentine 1 as I have one of their units. It definitely filters out the radar based collision avoidance systems from other cars.

However it does not filter out laser collision avoidance systems. Never will I own an Infiniti or Mazda because they use laser collision systems.
 
Posts: 3816 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: November 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Stupid
Allergy
Picture of dry-fly
posted Hide Post
I had both Valentine One and Escort's top unit last year. I sold or returned them. Still constant falsing. The can be tuned and you have to learn what to tune out, then they work pretty well. Personally it drove me nuts.


"Attack life, it's going to kill you anyway." Steve McQueen...
 
Posts: 7067 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: July 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dry-fly:
I had both Valentine One and Escort's top unit last year. I sold or returned them. Still constant falsing. The can be tuned and you have to learn what to tune out, then they work pretty well. Personally it drove me nuts.


I had some older V1s that false on the new GMC/Cadillac constantly, among others. Sent them in for an "upgrade" and they now no longer do this at all.

IOW, they can fix and old one not to and the new ones already will be good to go. One of the things I LOVE about V1 is the upgradable chassis. Granted these updates aren't super cheap, but any other detector will require a replacement.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 12672 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eschew Obfuscation
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Georgeair:

IOW, they can fix and old one not to and the new ones already will be good to go. One of the things I LOVE about V1 is the upgradable chassis. Granted these updates aren't super cheap, but any other detector will require a replacement.

Georgeair, you nailed my follow-up - which is whether existing units are upgradeable.

Unless I'm missing it on their site, it does not look like you can upgrade the Escort. Which means, if correct, I spent $500+ on a paperweight.


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Unflappable Enginerd
Picture of stoic-one
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CoolRich59:
...which is whether existing units are upgradeable.

Unless I'm missing it on their site, it does not look like you can upgrade the Escort. Which means, if correct, I spent $500+ on a paperweight.
The Escort units can be upgraded/updated with firmware and software updates, no actual hardware updates w/o returning it to them. Best I can tell a firmware update patched my Max2 to ignore collision avoidance systems. What they call an In-Vehicle Technology (IVT) Filter.
I'm not a V1 user so I have no idea what they are capable of upgrade wise.


__________________________________

NRA Benefactor
I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident.
http://www.aufamily.com/forums/
 
Posts: 6367 | Location: Headland, AL | Registered: April 19, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eschew Obfuscation
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stoic-one:
quote:
Originally posted by CoolRich59:
...which is whether existing units are upgradeable.

Unless I'm missing it on their site, it does not look like you can upgrade the Escort. Which means, if correct, I spent $500+ on a paperweight.
The Escort units can be upgraded/updated with firmware and software updates, no actual hardware updates w/o returning it to them. Best I can tell a firmware update patched my Max2 to ignore collision avoidance systems. What they call an In-Vehicle Technology (IVT) Filter.
I'm not a V1 user so I have no idea what they are capable of upgrade wise.

Thanks stoic-one. That's what I went on their site to look for but did not see. I will do a little more digging or contact them.


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Yep the new V1 will filter them and the older ones can be upgraded. I have 3 and had to have 2 of them upgraded.
 
Posts: 874 | Location: Alabama | Registered: January 05, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
Why the need to drive so fast?


————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 25674 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eschew Obfuscation
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?

So I can die doing what I love! Big Grin

Seriously, though. I really am not a big lead foot. But, I live in Illinois and the municipalities like to use things like aggressive traffic enforcement to generate revenue.

I agree that anyone driving 20+ over the speed limit is asking to get stopped. By I hear about people around here getting ticketed for minuscule violations. The police aren't issuing citations for safety reasons. They are being ordered to go out and write tickets so the city council can fund their pet projects.


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gone but Together Again.
Dad & Uncle
Picture of h2oys
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?


Where I live there are about 100 different villages/municipalities/cities/townships. Most have their own police departments and many run very notorious speed traps. Like on the downside of a hill and the speed limit drops as well.

If you did not have one you would coast down the hill and get nailed. There was one city where a now retired officer was notorious for his motorcycle enforcement. He would give you a ticket for 1mph over the limit.

The officer is just doing his job as he/she WAS told to do. Hence the blame goes to the leaders of each of these notorious revenue machines. Thus the need for something like a detector to level the playing field.
 
Posts: 3816 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: November 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eschew Obfuscation
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by h2oys:

The officer is just doing his job as he/she WAS told to do. Hence the blame goes to the leaders of each of these notorious revenue machines. Thus the need for something like a detector to level the playing field.

Absolutely. I don't blame the police. Like you said, they're doing their job.

I haven't even been pulled over in more than 5 years. But, on that occasion, I got to talking with the officer and he told he would like to let me go with a warning, but his orders from the village was that no one gets off. If he pulls someone over, a ticket gets issued.


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CoolRich59:
The police aren't issuing citations for safety reasons. They are being ordered to go out and write tickets so the city council can fund their pet projects.


Sure about that??
In NC, all monies generated from Uniform Citations go to the State. They city where I worked had "parking tickets" that were paid to the city, but there was no line for speeding;local charges for corner cutting, fire lane violations, parking violations...etc-but not speeding...

When I worked traffic, I did it to get DWI's off the road, so I might stop you for 5 or 10 over and after figuring out you weren't drunk, you got a verbal warning...



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11459 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Prefontaine
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Georgeair:
quote:
Originally posted by dry-fly:
I had both Valentine One and Escort's top unit last year. I sold or returned them. Still constant falsing. The can be tuned and you have to learn what to tune out, then they work pretty well. Personally it drove me nuts.


I had some older V1s that false on the new GMC/Cadillac constantly, among others. Sent them in for an "upgrade" and they now no longer do this at all.

IOW, they can fix and old one not to and the new ones already will be good to go. One of the things I LOVE about V1 is the upgradable chassis. Granted these updates aren't super cheap, but any other detector will require a replacement.


Same. Upgraded my V1 and all that car radar bs went completely away. So impressed I bought a 2nd one. I've owned one for 16 years, and it is indeed permanently upgradeable. In fact besides the house, the only permanently uphradeable purchase I've ever bought.



What am I doing? I'm talking to an empty telephone
 
Posts: 12932 | Location: Down South | Registered: January 16, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Prefontaine
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?


Why does a dog lick his balls?

I think you'll find where most people speed, is the highway, whether interstate or rural.
And then the motorcyclists among us speed on twisty roads out in the canyons or sticks.



What am I doing? I'm talking to an empty telephone
 
Posts: 12932 | Location: Down South | Registered: January 16, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?


Yep.

Though this is coming from a Virginian where radar detectors are illegal and speeding costs your first born.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21108 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by h2oys:
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?


Where I live there are about 100 different villages/municipalities/cities/townships. Most have their own police departments and many run very notorious speed traps. Like on the downside of a hill and the speed limit drops as well.

If you did not have one you would coast down the hill and get nailed. There was one city where a now retired officer was notorious for his motorcycle enforcement. He would give you a ticket for 1mph over the limit.

The officer is just doing his job as he/she WAS told to do. Hence the blame goes to the leaders of each of these notorious revenue machines. Thus the need for something like a detector to level the playing field.


So you know you will get punished for breaking the law in certain areas and still need to employ counter measures to effectively break the law? Just leave three minutes earlier. Way easier and cheaper.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21108 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gone but Together Again.
Dad & Uncle
Picture of h2oys
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skins2881:
quote:
Originally posted by h2oys:
quote:
Originally posted by Black92LX:
Why the need to drive so fast?


Where I live there are about 100 different villages/municipalities/cities/townships. Most have their own police departments and many run very notorious speed traps. Like on the downside of a hill and the speed limit drops as well.

If you did not have one you would coast down the hill and get nailed. There was one city where a now retired officer was notorious for his motorcycle enforcement. He would give you a ticket for 1mph over the limit.

The officer is just doing his job as he/she WAS told to do. Hence the blame goes to the leaders of each of these notorious revenue machines. Thus the need for something like a detector to level the playing field.


So you know you will get punished for breaking the law in certain areas and still need to employ counter measures to effectively break the law? Just leave three minutes earlier. Way easier and cheaper.


That's not the issue at all. Should I brake rolling down a hill to avoid going 1mph over the limit? That's insane. However in certain areas in St. Louis, going 1mph over will get you a ticket in a city/village/etc. wherein over 30% of their revenue is driven by forcing their police to issue tickets.

Going from one city/village where its not a big deal to go 1mph over to the next where they issue every citation possible is virtually impossible in our area.

The "ticket cities/villages/etc" in our area has become such an issue the State of MO has passed laws limiting how much money each public entity can raise by traffic tickets based upon its overall revenue.
 
Posts: 3816 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: November 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Do No Harm,
Do Know Harm
posted Hide Post
As Mike says...in NC the state gets the money. In my agency, nobody cares how many tickets you write. They will jump your ass for not stopping a car all month, but if you stopped 50 cars and wrote zero tickets, they won't complain.


Allowing agencies to directly benefit from writing tickets is a bit dumb.




Knowing what one is talking about is widely admired but not strictly required here.

Although sometimes distracting, there is often a certain entertainment value to this easy standard.
-JALLEN

"All I need is a WAR ON DRUGS reference and I got myself a police thread BINGO." -jljones
 
Posts: 11463 | Location: NC | Registered: August 16, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eschew Obfuscation
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MikeinNC:

Sure about that??

Not sure, but well-founded suspicion. After all, this is Illinois, where 3 of our last 4 governors went to prison. Wink


_____________________________________________________________________
“One of the common failings among honorable people is a failure to appreciate how thoroughly dishonorable some other people can be, and how dangerous it is to trust them.” – Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 6568 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: December 17, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Can Radar Detectors Now Filter Out In-Vehicle Radars?

© SIGforum 2024