SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Dec 15 Video of F-35 ejection at NAS Fort Worth UPDATED March 7, 2023
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Dec 15 Video of F-35 ejection at NAS Fort Worth UPDATED March 7, 2023 Login/Join 
Member
posted
The video begins with a vertical screen but switches to full at about :35.

"Class, this demonstrates the value of a zero-zero ejection system."

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/lo...eserve-base/3149776/

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Sigmund,
 
Posts: 16211 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
Looked like it was just a split second away from coming to a stop before the pilot ejected…I’m sure the zoomies will come in and tell us why.

I’m not faulting the pilot for bailing, just never been in that situation and don’t know OK..besides to obvious



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11789 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Laugh or Die
posted Hide Post
Bitching Betty may have been like "EJECT EJECT EJECT" and he was just like... "well ok". Maybe was afraid something was about to explode.


________________________________________________
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: NC | Registered: May 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post


Were the elevators supposed to be what looked like hard down like that?



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"Pen & Sword as one."
 
Posts: 17430 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Back, and
to the left
Picture of 83v45magna
posted Hide Post
It looked like the lift fan shut down but the main engine was spinning up and trying to flip it over ass first.
 
Posts: 7599 | Location: Dallas | Registered: August 04, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Happiness is
Vectored Thrust
Picture of mojojojo
posted Hide Post
*sigh* Great video of how NOT to do a vertical landing.

He's got forward movement so it's not really a vertical landing but more of an RVL (rolling vertical landing) but more importantly he fails to go to idle upon touchdown, resulting in a huge landing "bounce" and then fails to keep the jet level by letting the nose drop. So unless there was some mechanical failure in the throttle quadrant or the engine not going to idle when commanded, the fault lies with the pilot.

I won't second guess the decision to eject because as a single seat pilot when you think it's time to go then you go. But he turned what might have been at worst a class B mishap into a class A.

They should show that clip to all the Marine F-35 pilots on what not to do.



Icarus flew too close to the sun, but at least he flew.
 
Posts: 6837 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: April 30, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
"The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed Thursday afternoon the crashed aircraft was owned by Lockheed Martin and had not yet been transferred to the U.S. government. The DOD said it didn’t know specifics about the pilot, including whether he or she is a Marine. The Pentagon declined to comment further on the situation.

Lockheed Martin confirmed the pilot is a U.S. government employee. The company declined to comment on the cause of the crash until further investigation...'


Complete article:

https://www.star-telegram.com/...rticle270048007.html

Whoever was at the controls, one would think a factory pilot would be highly skilled and not making low-time pilot mistakes.
 
Posts: 16211 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I am betting that the pilot was a high time test pilot that knew exactly what they were doing and that it was a software or fan glitch and the ejection sequence may have been automated and not by direct pilot command.

Damn they hit hard


__________________________
Keep your rotor in the green
The aircraft in trim
Your time over target short
Make it count
 
Posts: 1448 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: November 09, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Happiness is
Vectored Thrust
Picture of mojojojo
posted Hide Post
It's been awhile and I can't say I'm completely up to speed on the latest aviation technology, but I'm not aware of any aircraft with an "automated" ejection system (one where the ejection happens without aircrew activation). I'm aware of automated flight recovery systems that will automatically fly the aircraft away from the ground under specific conditions, but automated ejections?

I'm thinking that the pilot pulled the handle as the jet was about to dribble off the runway.



Icarus flew too close to the sun, but at least he flew.
 
Posts: 6837 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: April 30, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kkina:


Were the elevators supposed to be what looked like hard down like that?


It’s doing a vertical landing, so the elevators are doing almost nothing since there is almost no airflow over them. That’s probably just a standard position for this landing mode. The aircraft is being “supported” by the lift fan and the rear exhaust rotated down. Attitude control is done by the engines and puffer jets.
 
Posts: 3551 | Location: South FL | Registered: February 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
Was expecting destroyed plane bits everywhere from the thread title.
Sure pressed along on the nose for a while before the eject.

Does the eject sequence kill the engine?




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16889 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I remember hearing stories of the USMC's Harriers having all sorts of problems that resembled this. Wasn't unusual to hear about Harrier pilots making sure they took a few tools on a flight as removing a panel was a possibility.
 
Posts: 15481 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Happiness is
Vectored Thrust
Picture of mojojojo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
I remember hearing stories of the USMC's Harriers having all sorts of problems that resembled this. Wasn't unusual to hear about Harrier pilots making sure they took a few tools on a flight as removing a panel was a possibility.


The Harrier had a lot of teething problems when it was introduced, especially in A and C models. The B version was almost an entirely different aircraft and much more stable with better slow speed & v/stol performance which increased safety and lowered accidents.

I'm not aware of pilots doing any wrenching on the Harrier. Oh I've added water to the tanks before but that's about it. I've ne er known a Harroer pilot to carry tools to work on the aircraft though.

Watching the crash video again, I'm thinking that when the plane bounced the pilot pushed the stick forward to get it down rather than pull power (It's almost instinctive to do so) causing the nose to hit the ground first. After that he's along for the ride but still appears he was slow to get the power to idle.

Again, perhaps a mechanical problem and if so it'll come out in the investigation, but my moneys on pilot error.



Icarus flew too close to the sun, but at least he flew.
 
Posts: 6837 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: April 30, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Perception
posted Hide Post
Watching the video, it looked like he was almost hovering and lost control of his sink rate (he seemed to be accelerating toward the ground. I wonder if he juiced it trying to stabilize the descent and gave it too much resulting in the bounce and theatrics.

The way it rotated after the bounce looks almost like the front tried to transition to forward flight while the back wasn't having it so I can see it being mechanical as well.




"The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."
"Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."
"I did," said Ford, "it is."
"So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?"
"It honestly doesn't occur to them. They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates the government they want."
"You mean they actually vote for the lizards."
"Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."
"But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"
"Because if they didn't vote for a lizard, then the wrong lizard might get in."
 
Posts: 3648 | Location: Two blocks from the Center of the Universe | Registered: December 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Optimistic Cynic
Picture of architect
posted Hide Post
What has always confused me about airplane ejections is: how does the pilot get back in to land the plane?
 
Posts: 7167 | Location: NoVA | Registered: July 22, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
You have cow?
I lift cow!
posted Hide Post
He let the clutch out to fast. We've all been there.


------------------------------
http://defendersoffreedom.us/
 
Posts: 7048 | Location: Bay Area | Registered: December 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by architect:
What has always confused me about airplane ejections is: how does the pilot get back in to land the plane?






The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16889 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
deleted by an old grunt that had no business commenting.

now to find my crayons.
 
Posts: 364 | Registered: March 04, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
^ I think that's the vertical ducting (not sure the proper terminology here) opening, not the hatch, that you're seeing prior to eject.
Something flies off after ejecting (seat or canopy?).




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16889 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
To my complete non-expert eyes, that ejection looked prudent. When the aircraft nosed down and started rotating around on its side, I was expecting the plane to roll over.

Being trapped in an upside down crashed aircraft with the canopy pinned against the ground would be a Very Bad Day, especially with the risk of a fire.
 
Posts: 33959 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Dec 15 Video of F-35 ejection at NAS Fort Worth UPDATED March 7, 2023

© SIGforum 2025