quote:

Originally posted by grumpy1: and turn us all into fat weaklings getting us off red meats. WTF WEF is up with almond candies on the list?

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

quote:

Originally posted by Scooter123:

quote:

Originally posted by Anush:
Skinless chicken breast = Skinless, boneless & tasteless

You forgot that it's also high in Sodium, because 'every' piece sold is brined (typically in a salt/sugar solution).

That is utter Bullshit! Perhaps you've not heard of the Certified Organic, Certified Humane and Non-GMO' Project Verified certifications. There's plenty of 100% Natural Chicken Breast available on the market!

You should start counting again...

quote:

Originally posted by Scooter123:

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

quote:

Originally posted by Scooter123:
You forgot that it's also high in Sodium, because 'every' piece sold is brined (typically in a salt/sugar solution).

That is utter Bullshit! Perhaps you've not heard of the Certified Organic, Certified Humane and Non-GMO' Project Verified certifications. There's plenty of 100% Natural Chicken Breast available on the market!

Certified Organic, Certified Humane and Non-GMO. You do realize that there is not any Federal agency that actually is involved in enforcing Organic or Humane standards, so commercial producers can get certified by paying money to an organization that was formed specifically to provide these certifications for a fee. As for non GMO, there you are digging into 3 Federal agencies and all they do is regulate what GMO products are considered Safe for public consumption and safe for the environment. There are no Federal agencies that monitor if a product is truly non GMO. If you want to believe a label you are certainly welcome to do that, however I am a lot more skeptical. Following is a statement from one of these Certification Providers explaining the complete lack of any Federal Oversight and the need for this Certification Provider. I won't argue the need for a Certification process, I just question the ability of a private organization to actually do enough field inspections to insure than one of their clients isn't Cheating. I'll also note that testing for GMO requires a DNA analysis and I suspect that none of these Certification providers has the money to set up a DNA lab.

https://certifiedhumane.org/looking-beyond-the-label/

Note, I don't eat chicken breast because to me it tastes like sand. However my sister loves this sand so I get served this when I go visit her and I can taste salt in that chicken breast. BTW her husband is also on a low salt diet and she does not add salt to food she prepares.

As for the Sodium level, I did some looking and you are correct on that note. Tyson Chicken breasts are brined but it's called "chicken broth and sea salt" on the package. Per their nutrition data on the web site it's 180mg of sodium per serving. Note serving size is 112 grams about 4 ounces. A bit more sodium than a 1 ounce bag of Potato Chips. Miller chicken which carries all of the Woke certifications lists just 55mg of Sodium in their nutrition claims so it appears to not be brined or very lightly brined.

Personally I prefer Chicken Thighs and have always got Millers because their skinless thighs are trimmed of Fat as much as possible. In comparison Tyson chicken thighs are loaded with fat.

quote:

Originally posted by grumpy1:
WTF is up with almond candies on the list? Almonds are great but I like mine just roasted with just a little salt.

quote:

The California almond industry controls a significant amount of agricultural land. As of recent estimates, almond orchards cover approximately 1.6 million acres of land in California. This makes almonds one of the most prominent crops in the state, reflecting both the high demand for almonds and the suitable growing conditions in California's Central Valley. The industry's extensive land use has implications for water resources, land management, and the broader agricultural economy in the state. As of recent figures, the industry is estimated to bring in about $6 billion annually. This revenue comes from both domestic sales and exports, with almonds being one of California's top agricultural exports. The industry relies heavily on immigrant labor, influencing debates on immigration policy, labor laws, and workers' rights. The industry's economic importance leads to significant lobbying for agricultural subsidies and support programs. Almond farming is highly water-intensive, which sparks debates over water rights and allocation, especially during droughts.

quote:

The California almond industry's lobbying power is substantial, reflecting its significant economic influence and the importance of agricultural policies to its operations. Here’s a detailed look at their lobbying efforts and strategies, along with citations where applicable:

Lobbying Efforts and Strategies
1. Financial Contributions:

Campaign Contributions: The almond industry, along with broader agricultural interests, contributes considerable amounts to political campaigns. These contributions are aimed at candidates and political action committees (PACs) that support agricultural-friendly policies.
Political Action Committees: Organizations like the California Almond PAC engage in political advocacy by funding campaigns and lobbying efforts that benefit the almond industry.
2. Advocacy Groups:

Industry Associations: Groups such as the Almond Board of California play a crucial role in lobbying efforts. They engage in extensive lobbying activities to influence agricultural policies, water management regulations, and trade policies.
Collaborations: The almond industry collaborates with other agricultural sectors to strengthen their lobbying efforts, forming coalitions that advocate for common interests in water rights, environmental regulations, and subsidies.
3. Policy Influence:

Water Policy: The almond industry actively lobbies for favorable water policies, given the crop's high water demand. This includes advocating for infrastructure projects that ensure reliable water supply and opposing regulations that would restrict water usage.
Environmental Regulations: The industry works to influence environmental regulations, seeking to balance compliance with sustainability goals without imposing excessive costs on growers. This includes lobbying against stringent pesticide regulations and supporting measures that provide flexibility in meeting environmental standards.
4. Research and Public Relations:

Funding Research: The Almond Board of California funds research to support the industry’s positions on various issues, such as water efficiency and environmental impact. This research is used to advocate for policies based on scientific findings.
Public Relations Campaigns: The industry invests in public relations campaigns to shape public perception and garner support for their policy positions. These campaigns highlight the economic benefits of almond farming and efforts towards sustainability.
Evidence and Citations
Financial Influence: The Almond Board of California and other agricultural interests have been known to make significant contributions to political campaigns and PACs. According to OpenSecrets, agricultural PACs and individual contributors from the agriculture sector consistently rank among the top donors to political campaigns .

Lobbying Expenditures: The Almond Board of California and related entities regularly report lobbying expenditures. For instance, records from the California Secretary of State’s lobbying activity reports detail the amounts spent on lobbying efforts each quarter .

Water Policy Advocacy: During periods of drought, the industry has been particularly active in lobbying for water policies that ensure a stable water supply for almond growers. Articles from sources like Bloomberg and The New York Times have documented these lobbying efforts, emphasizing the industry's push for favorable water allocation policies and infrastructure projects .

Environmental Regulation Influence: The almond industry’s lobbying against certain environmental regulations, particularly those related to pesticide use and water quality, has been covered in environmental policy reviews and agricultural journals. These sources highlight the industry's efforts to balance regulatory compliance with maintaining profitability .

These activities demonstrate the significant lobbying power of the California almond industry, which leverages financial contributions, advocacy groups, and strategic public relations to influence policy decisions at the local, state, and federal levels.

References
OpenSecrets: Agricultural PACs
California Secretary of State: Lobbying Activity Reports
Bloomberg: Almond Industry’s Water Lobby
The New York Times: Water Wars in California
Environmental Policy Review: Pesticide Regulation and Agriculture
Agricultural Journal: Balancing Regulation and Profitability

quote:

Originally posted by irreverent:
This can’t be real.

quote:

Originally posted by trapper189:

If one were to look at the data in the 208 pages of the link, one would find that chicken breast has a Nutri-Score of B while Lucky Charms is rated a D. The food compass score is much more complex and take 54 different attributes into account. It shouldn’t be a shock that chicken breast by itself is not as nutritious as Lucky Charms. Lucky Charms has all sorts of vitamins and minerals added that chicken breast does not. For example, ground beef is way down there at 26, but pair it with beans and it jumps to 74 healthily beating Lucky Charms.

quote:

Originally posted by drtenb330:
I want to print it out and hang it up at work but I'm afraid it would be taken out of context. The first two "foods" would be racist, and there'd be an investigation...