SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    “By law, the [insert government department/body here] cannot comment further on personnel matters”
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
“By law, the [insert government department/body here] cannot comment further on personnel matters” Login/Join 
SIGforum Official
Eye Doc
Picture of bcereuss
posted
Just what law is this? Is there a law or statute that actually prohibits government representatives or government employers commenting on personnel matters for federal (or any other governmental branch, for that matter) employees?

I’m not talking about discrimination or protected speech or truly private employee/employment information…but specifically-is there a law or statute specifically addressing employment concerns of government workers or employees, when there is (or isn’t) a public interest?

This is brought on by (most recently) the DOE refusing to offer any more than the above comments on the suitcase thief…but I’ve seen the excuse used frequently.

So, can anyone show a specific statute or law of the sort?
 
Posts: 3079 | Location: (Occupied) Northern Minnesota | Registered: June 24, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Help! Help!
I'm being repressed!

Picture of Skull Leader
posted Hide Post
The reason is the employee is deserving of privacy and talking about personnel matters just increases potential liability.

Saying that, the .gov does use it as an excuse to skirt questioning on big picture questions quite often it seems.
 
Posts: 11218 | Location: The Magnolia State | Registered: November 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Most federal agencies will cite the Privacy Act of 1974 which generally prohibits an agency from publicly disclosing information in the records it keeps. Various state laws probably come into play too, as do agency policies and pragmatic concerns about litigation.
 
Posts: 1020 | Location: Tampa | Registered: July 27, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Avoiding potential liability. It’s common in the business world too. If you call a company asking about a previous employee of theirs that you are looking to hire, all they will say is how long they worked there, and maybe their last position. Nothing about the circumstances under which they left.
 
Posts: 3496 | Location: South FL | Registered: February 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6), Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) which states FOIA excludes release of

“(6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;”

The Merit System Protection Board also has rules, but the FOIA is the primary reason. See 5 USC § 2302(b), Prohibited Personnel Practices.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32579 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    “By law, the [insert government department/body here] cannot comment further on personnel matters”

© SIGforum 2024