Well, I tell ya- after watching the news coverage of this over the past 24 hours- if this revelation was timed to mitigate whatever, they failed badly, and do mean badly.

Since the media pundits are figuring out that the advanced nature of ol' Joe's cancer means that it's been progressing for years, it means that it was known about for years, and not revealed to the public. As 12131 pointed out, if this were just some regular guy, it's plausible that the cancer could be missed, but, the POTUS? Nope, not buying it.

And it's my understanding that you can find detailed results of annual medical exams for Bush, Obama and President Trump, but for Biden, there are just brief, vague summaries. This doesn't pass the smell test.

So, the quest for sympathy for Two Scoops (if that's what it's intended to be) is now being seen as yet another part of the massive coverup of this asshole's decrepit, terminal condition, which rendered him unfit for the office of the presidency. Others were running the country and we need to find out who and all those pardons and EOs needs to be nullified. Probably won't happen, but it most certainly is what should happen.

The dems and their news media co-conspirators have screwed up just about as badly as they could possibly do. The stench of all of this will be on them for years.

I think it was done to offset the Hurr tapes but they erred badly. Like Para said, with the type of exam Bidet was suppose to get every year while Acting President, there is no way that the prostrate cancer "just happened". I think one part of the Dim's plan was for Old Joe to stubble across the finish line, winning the election and then resigning due to health reasons. Of course, I doubt "Doctor" Biden would have let old Joe resign and we would have had a real "Weekend at Bernie's" scenario.

The more I learn about the cancer diagnosis the more I think that its Jill Biden and her desire for power that pushed this sick old man into the presidency.

I wonder what stories we’re going to hear if he does croak? And for how long?

quote:

Originally posted by 400m:
I wonder what stories we’re going to hear if he does croak? And for how long?

Naturally, we’ll hear what a wonderful human being he was, and how much he sacrificed for his lifetime of political service to The American People.

At this point they’ll probably say he was a life member of the NRA and America’s first Hispanic black female President.

To quote Clinton; At this point, what’s it matter?

Those responsible should not be hard to identify. You're not going to lie to protect someone else when it means putting yourself in legal peril for things you are not responsible.

The bus should prepare itself for people being thrown under it.

Hmmmm. Last Thursday, I noticed an uptick in protesting at Comer’s office. There was a whopping 40 screeching fools going on about”Facists”. Usually there is no more than a dozen of the pink haired freaks. I got the impression that the group had been bussed in.

I wonder if that was pretext protesting to this dropping.

Biden’s Autopen Scandal Just Got a Whole Lot Worse
Matt Margolis | 10:36 AM on March 18, 2025


The presidential autopen has been in use since the 1950s, with its legality debated for years. In 2013, Barack Obama became the first president to sign a bill into law using an autopen while vacationing in Hawaii, relying on a Bush-era legal memo stating a president’s presence wasn’t required if he had authorized the signature.

The key issue with Biden, however, is whether he actually authorized the use of the autopen — or if someone else was running it without his knowledge.

The New York Post then uncovered a pattern of potential power abuse within the Biden White House, with insiders suspecting a key aide may have made unilateral decisions on what to sign.

On Sunday night, Trump declared that Biden’s pardons are “VOID, VACANT, AND NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them!”

On Monday, The Oversight Project released a memo exposing 32 instances where the Biden White House used an autopen to sign clemency warrants, granting pardons and commutations to thousands — including preemptive pardons for members of the J6 Committee. The report raises serious concerns about the implications of a presidency governed by autopen rather than by the president himself.


“We analyzed the 51 clemency warrants with President Biden’s signature on them. In those warrants, the Biden Administration granted clemency to 4,245 people—the most of any President,” the memo reads. “We found that the Biden White House used two variations of his signature loaded into an autopen to sign over half of the clemency warrants issued during his Presidency. We identified the two autopen signatures as Autopen A and Autopen B in this Memorandum.”

The memo continued, “We calculated that the Biden Administration signed 16 warrants with Autopen A, 16 warrants with Autopen B, and 19 warrants appear to be signed with a wet signature.”

Interestingly enough, the pardon of Hunter Biden appears to have been legitimately signed by Joe Biden, which makes sense. But here’s where things get really bad:

The warrants we determined to be wet signatures contain significant variations between the signatures. Some warrants spell out the President’s entire first name “Joseph.” Others have only a diagonal line to indicate the letter “J.” Other wet signed warrants have significant variations in the President’s middle initial “R” and “B” in the last name “Biden.” At the time of publication of this Memorandum, the variations of the wet signatures are so severe, that it is unclear whether the same person signed all of the warrants. We are continuing to investigate this issue.

That’s right: While the Oversight Project hasn’t confirmed it yet, evidence suggests that beyond a rogue staffer using the autopen — possibly without Biden’s authorization — one or more aides may have outright signed his signature on certain pardons and commutations.

Could the inconsistencies be a symptom of Biden’s cognitive decline? Perhaps. But the variations in his signature may point to something even more troubling: deliberate forgery.

This could be huge because it tells us that staffers were confident Biden was out of it to the extent that they could get away with actual forgery, not just abuse of the autopen.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margo...a1cb93&lctg=21115632

Bring in handwriting experts. There is ZERO chance if different people were doing “wet” signatures that it cannot be determined. These treasonous leftists will be caught. I wonder which low grade imbecile will be sacrificed for “violating the presidents trust”

Doctor who worked with Biden says he had cancer ‘while he was president’: ‘He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days’
By
Emily Crane
Published May 19, 2025
Updated May 19, 2025, 11:04 a.m. ET
A top oncologist who once worked for former President Joe Biden claimed Monday that his old boss must have had prostate cancer long before Sunday’s public announcement of his diagnosis and suggested the oldest-ever president may even have had the disease for “a decade.”
Dr Ezekiel Emanuel, a former member of Biden’s transition team who helped craft the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, stunned MSNBC’s left-leaning “Morning Joe” with his analysis that the 82-year-old likely had cancer while serving as president.
“He’s had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading,” Emanuel told the Biden-supporting hosts early Monday. “He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days.”
“Morning Joe” hosts were left stunned as Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel suggested Joe Biden’s advanced prostate cancer should have been caught earlier.MSNBC
“He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021. Yes, I don’t think there’s any disagreement about that.”
The Sunday announcement from the former president’s office came two days after he learned of the diagnosis.
to find a “small nodule” on Biden’s prostate earlier this month, according to his staff.
Given the cancer’s Gleason score of 9 and the fact that it metastasized to the bone, many medical experts speculated that the former president had the prostate cancer for some time. Some doctors have said it is “inconceivable” Biden’s diagnosis managed to go undetected for so long.
Emanuel noted that while some doctors recommended not doing a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) exam – a routine bloodwork test – after the age of 70, he should have had those exams when he was younger.
“He was vice president and had a lot of exams under 70. So it’s a little surprising that they didn’t do it,” the oncologist said.
“And maybe President Biden decided he didn’t want the test. Many men do decide they don’t want a PSA, but this is also aggressive.
“When we talk about the aggressive part, what we mean is that Gleason score, that score is from two up to 10. And he’s a nine. And that means that the cancer doesn’t look normal, it looks very abnormal, which is probably why it’s in the bone,” he continued.

Joe Biden is sworn-in as president of the United States next to his wife Jill Biden, by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.REUTERS
Emanuel noted that former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush both underwent PSA exams while in office.
“I don’t know what President Biden and his doctor discussed, but I think you are hinting at the other element, which is that President Obama had this test, President Bush had this test,” he said.
“It is a little surprising that the doctor didn’t take it. And if he took it and didn’t report it and it was elevated, that is another case of doctors not being straightforward with us.
“We’ve had several of them with President Trump, especially around his COVID diagnosis. And if that is true, that would be very troubling.”
When pressed about exactly how many years Biden may have had the disease, Emanuel said: “We don’t know, obviously. And it is a little surprising to many of us oncologists that he wasn’t diagnosed earlier.”


https://nypost.com/2025/05/19/...isease-for-a-decade/

https://townhall.com/columnist...-biden-lies-n2657320 Excerpt:

quote:

There are two categories of people who heard the “news” – well, it was only news to the American people – and immediately told us that we need to slow our roll on demanding accountability for the rudderless presidency in solemn deference to this ultra-convenient revelation. The first kind are nice people, too nice. Some are serial Fredocon invertebrates who always counsel weakness, submission, and silence. Some believe Christian charity requires not only prayers for him and his family but a free pass on this massive wrongdoing for everyone involved. Others have an understandable sensitivity to the subject because they had family members who suffered the same terrible illness that Joe Biden has just been revealed to have, even though everybody around him must’ve known he had it for years and simply lied to cover it up.

Well, the sissies can pound sand; they look at history and think the Vichy French were too belligerent. I’m not going to judge the others; you need to follow your conscience. But I’m also not going to listen to them. I’m going to say what I want, all the time, and I’m going to continue to point out that Joe Biden is an evil, senile, corrupt pervert, who was and is surrounded by minions interested only in retaining their prestige, power, and plunder.

quote:

Originally posted by vthoky:

quote:

Originally posted by 400m:
I wonder what stories we’re going to hear if he does croak? And for how long?

Naturally, we’ll hear what a wonderful human being he was, and how much he sacrificed for his lifetime of political service to The American People.

Don't forget his hero-son who succumbed to prostate cancer.....

Since the diagnosis of FJB, lots of talk is occurring about how long he’s had it, what was known and when did they know it, etc.

As someone who is 73 yoa, when I asked my doc about having one, the answer was it is of “questionable reliability”.

Doing a Google/AI search revealed this:

The Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test is a blood test used to screen for prostate cancer. Its accuracy depends on several factors:

Sensitivity: The ability to detect prostate cancer when it is present. Studies have shown that the PSA test has a sensitivity of around 60-80%. This means that 20-40% of men with prostate cancer may have a normal PSA level.

Specificity: The ability to correctly identify men who do not have prostate cancer. The PSA test has a specificity of around 70-90%. This means that 10-30% of men without prostate cancer may have an elevated PSA level.

PSA Level: Higher PSA levels are more likely to indicate prostate cancer. A PSA level of 4 ng/mL or higher is considered elevated. However, even men with PSA levels below 4 ng/mL can have prostate cancer.

Other Factors: Age, family history, and ethnicity can also affect the accuracy of the PSA test.

So what say the medicos here about the PSA test ?

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
Since the diagnosis of FJB, lots of talk is occurring about how long he’s had it, what was known and when did they know it, etc.

As someone who is 73 yoa, when I asked my doc about having one, the answer was it is of “questionable reliability”.

Doing a Google/AI search revealed this:

The Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test is a blood test used to screen for prostate cancer. Its accuracy depends on several factors:

Sensitivity: The ability to detect prostate cancer when it is present. Studies have shown that the PSA test has a sensitivity of around 60-80%. This means that 20-40% of men with prostate cancer may have a normal PSA level.

Specificity: The ability to correctly identify men who do not have prostate cancer. The PSA test has a specificity of around 70-90%. This means that 10-30% of men without prostate cancer may have an elevated PSA level.

PSA Level: Higher PSA levels are more likely to indicate prostate cancer. A PSA level of 4 ng/mL or higher is considered elevated. However, even men with PSA levels below 4 ng/mL can have prostate cancer.

Other Factors: Age, family history, and ethnicity can also affect the accuracy of the PSA test.

So what say the medicos here about the PSA test ?

I would say the metastasis to the bone is putting this at a whole new level, which in itself, says this was ignored previously.

^^^^^^^
I don’t believe it.

quote:

Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
^^^^^^^
I don’t believe it.

No shit.

A rubber glove from Harbor Freight, a smear of KY, and use of a doctor's finger costs how much?

We spent more on providing tranny comic books in Peru.