Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson earned a jab from one of her liberal colleagues on Tuesday as the justices increasingly feel compelled to single her out in legal opinions.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted a stay of a lower court ruling that halted the Trump administration's mass layoffs. Jackson was the sole dissenting voice. In a concurring opinion, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressly addressed and shut down Jackson's arguments.
"I agree with JUSTICE JACKSON that the President cannot restructure federal agencies in a manner inconsistent with congressional mandates," Sotomayor wrote. "Here, however, the relevant Executive Order directs agencies to plan reorganizations and reductions in force 'consistent with applicable law.'"
"The plans themselves are not before this Court, at this stage, and we thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law," she added.
Jackson, in her dissenting opinion, explicitly asserted that the issue at hand was the matter of the restructuring, which Sotomayor unambiguous rejected.
"What is at issue here is whether Executive Order No. 14210 effects a massive restructuring of the Federal Government (the likes of which have historically required Congress’s approval), on the one hand, or minor workforce reductions consistent with existing law, on the other," Jackson argued. As Sotomayor wrote, the merits of the reforms were not the matter before the court.
Though a relatively soft rebuke, Sotomayor's singling out of Jackson marks the latest incident of a Supreme Court justice feeling the need to explicitly slap down the Biden appointee.
In late June, the Supreme Court's conservatives issued a far more scathing rebuke of Jackson, asserting that she sought an "imperial judiciary" and implying that her arguments were so frivolous as to be unworthy of significant regard.
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary," wrote Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
"JUSTICE JACKSON would do well to heed her own admonition: '[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by law.' That goes for judges too," Barrett added.
_________________________
July 08, 2025, 07:02 PM
chbibc
quote:
Originally posted by wcb6092: Biden said he appointed her because she was a black woman (His exact words) he never said she was intelligent.
A DEI candidate nominated by president autopen to pander to his increasingly unhinged base.
----------------------- You can't fall off the floor.
July 08, 2025, 07:29 PM
Flashlightboy
Many different judges that I appear in front of are much more insightful, smarter and an asset to the bench. She's none of those things.
July 08, 2025, 07:39 PM
12131
This DEI hire idiot, who cannot even define what a woman is, didn’t write a damn thing. It was all done by her leftist clerks.
Q
July 08, 2025, 07:46 PM
parabellum
Listen to this, if you can
July 08, 2025, 07:47 PM
TigerDore
When one of the DEI triplets calls you out for the stupidity of your opinions, you are in bad, bad shape.
.
July 08, 2025, 08:29 PM
heydrich
So under qualified it’s sickening. All about checking the boxes.
“I'm fat because every time I do your girlfriend, she gives me a cookie”.
Is committed to helping increasing carbon emissions.
July 08, 2025, 10:04 PM
techguy
She’s the AOC of the Supreme Court.
July 08, 2025, 10:52 PM
Mustang-PaPa
Sorry i could only listen to about half of it.
July 08, 2025, 11:22 PM
PASig
She’s not qualified to be on a local school board let alone SCOTUS.
July 08, 2025, 11:56 PM
Rawny
I sometimes wonder if the judges act like they are in high school. They have lunch together in their special SCOTUS cafeteria. They form cliques and sit with their groups. KBJ giving the stink eye at ACB across the room for embarrassing her with that rebuke.
July 09, 2025, 07:05 AM
chbibc
Her opinion doesn't even purport to be related to the legality/constitutionality of the matter but instead discusses what she believes will be the consequences of a policy change. She's a woke legislator in judicial clothing.
----------------------- You can't fall off the floor.
July 09, 2025, 07:35 AM
Timdogg6
This "persevere" story. I'm calling bullshit. This is some Jussie Smollett shit right there. In the 90's at Harvard, oh bitch please.
__________________________
July 09, 2025, 08:04 AM
Gustofer
"...that symbolized how far our nation had traveled."
Now wait just a minute here. I thought we were a right wing racist country. Now I'm confused.
________________________________________________________ It is long past time for a Convention of States. The Founding Fathers gave us this tool to fix an out of control government and we need to use it.
Thank the Lord Trump appointed three justices. Vance can replace Thomas and Alito in his tenure!
July 10, 2025, 07:12 AM
6guns
^^^ I like your thinking!
SIGforum: For all your needs! Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>
July 10, 2025, 12:58 PM
Timdogg6
I think the Sotomayer shot across her bow is a signal that KJB will not last as long as the left hoped.
I doubt that she will suddenly see herself as wrong in her opinions but rather that the lure of easy cash on the speaking tour will outweigh her desire to stay on the bench in a combative environment relative to the other justices.
__________________________
July 10, 2025, 02:38 PM
Schmelby
quote:
Originally posted by Timdogg6: I think the Sotomayer shot across her bow is a signal that KJB will not last as long as the left hoped.
I doubt that she will suddenly see herself as wrong in her opinions but rather that the lure of easy cash on the speaking tour will outweigh her desire to stay on the bench in a combative environment relative to the other justices.