SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Progressive lens?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Progressive lens? Login/Join 
Fourth line skater
Picture of goose5
posted
Just moved into a new set of glasses with a new prescription. Nothing major for the distance, but the addition of a trifocal. I wanted to add that to help with focusing on the sights while shooting. They talked me into the new progressive lens which 4 days in I'm having problems. I just can't get used to the sweet spot and the distortion in the periphery. These things are sweet when I'm still and focusing on one thing, but when I'm in motion that's a problem. First day I had them I was untangle a knotted up hose and just about fell down. How long should I try to make this work?


_________________________
OH, Bonnie McMurray!
 
Posts: 7666 | Location: Pueblo, CO | Registered: July 03, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
It took me about ten days to acclimate. Would be disappointed with anything else now, really like that focus has no "steps" between distances.



The “POLICE"
Their job Is To Save Your Ass,
Not Kiss It

The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says "go away" in any language - Clint Smith
 
Posts: 2987 | Location: See der Rabbits, Iowa | Registered: June 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Conveniently located directly
above the center of the Earth
Picture of signewt
posted Hide Post
for me adaptation to continuous progressive lens was far easier than the constraints of lined trifocals, which were an abomination in comparison.

I'd never choose even lined bifocals again.

re: " I just can't get used to the sweet spot and the distortion in the periphery."
it's only periphery if you're not looking at the sweet spot. The distractions are easy to train out of, if I want 'clear' I look at it. And the tiny head/eye adaptation come with a little more range time.

I realize the conflict of the statement above regarding 'periphery', yet my eye has learned to ignore 'the periphery' in the same way the blur of rear sight vs front sight focus, as taught in basic target sighting.

Good luck whichever you choose.


**************~~~~~~~~~~
"I've been on this rock too long to bother with these liars any more."
~SIGforum advisor~
"When the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change, then change will come."~~sigmonkey

 
Posts: 9880 | Location: sunny Orygun | Registered: September 27, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
I never tried bifocals or progressives, but Mrs. Flash did.

She ran into walls, kind of fell off of curbs, tripped a bunch of times and finally gave up.

So she switched to monovision around 30 years ago and has done fine ever since.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Seeker of Clarity
Picture of r0gue
posted Hide Post
Tried and failed. I have two pair of glasses, and half the time struggle on with neither because they're in the wrong place from being set down all the time.




 
Posts: 11474 | Registered: August 02, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
Back in my younger days I needed significant correction for distant vision, and minimal, if any, correction for near vision. Progressive lenses worked just fine for me.

As my eyes aged, my distant vision improved and my near vision deteriorated, so the whole deal was reversed. When I tried progressive lenses for this situation I found them to be very disorienting. The optician replaced them at not charge, with lined tri-focals, which work just fine for general walking-around glasses. For desk work I used lined bi-focals, with just the intermediate and close segments, no correction for distant vision.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 31712 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
I cannot stand progressive lenses. Not at all.

Lined bifocal for me and a pair of reverse bifocals for when I'm shooting pistols.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14260 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 2BobTanner
posted Hide Post
Bought new glasses after getting a new prescription. Tried the progressive version, but kept getting headaches and wacky vision. Went back to line bifocals. To each his/her own.


---------------------
DJT-45/47 MAGA !!!!!

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." — Mark Twain

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.” — H. L. Mencken
 
Posts: 2847 | Location: Falls of the Ohio River, Kain-tuk-e | Registered: January 13, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I'd give it a week or two. I wore a set for a year and went back to single vision. The distortion in your periphery is something that while you can get used to, I just didn't want to keep dealing with.

For shooting, I solved this issue by going red dot and just using my distance glasses.


...that I will support
and defend...
 
Posts: 883 | Location: Northern VA | Registered: July 16, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have been wearing trifocals for over 20 years and like them. My complaint about them is that it seems that the prescription only last 12-18 months. My almost 73 yo eyes change quickly.

Will progressives be useful longer? As my eyes change, will the “sweet spot” move along the vertical axis as my eyes gradually change allowing me to adjust to the changing position of the sweet spot and
use the glasses longer?
 
Posts: 1623 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: April 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
It’s been along time since I worked in the eyeglass field, but if they don’t measure your pupillary distance perfectly and make your classes with the perfect pupillary distance there can be more difficulty for progressive wearers.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Left-Handed,
NOT Left-Winged!
posted Hide Post
Progressives need to be centered on your pupil correctly, and unfortunately there is no "standard" way to do this. Some places measure your pupil location with a ruler, some dot the "dummy" lens during fitting with a marker, then measure afterwards. And you need to get the frames adjusted right before they measure. Any adjustments afterwards will make things worse.

Lenscrafters uses a fancy iPad photo along with a jig they put the eyeglasses frames in that looks impressive but is consistently wrong every time because the morons in the store don't understand parallax. They stick the iPad in your face and center it, and tell you to look at them, but the lens is way off center and taking the photo at a compound angle.

I may try lined bifocals instead. My current prescription is under corrected in each eye by about .5 diopters to allow me more use of the distance part of the lens for medium distances (computers). They work well for desk work, but are hell on red dot sights and scope reticles. I have another Rx that is better for distance and shooting.

Night driving is a lot worse with progressives too. I used to have great vision for driving at night with single vision lenses, but now is a lot worse.
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mcrimm
posted Hide Post
Did you consider monovision correction? That's the way I have been corrected for 40 years. Distance in the right eye and reading in the left. About 1.5 diopters difference. Works great.



I'm sorry if I hurt you feelings when I called you stupid - I thought you already knew - Unknown
...................................
When you have no future, you live in the past. " Sycamore Row" by John Grisham
 
Posts: 4292 | Location: Saddlebrooke, Arizona | Registered: December 24, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Diablo Blanco
Picture of dking271
posted Hide Post
I have been in progressive lenses for two years. I took to them instantly without problems. Lucky I guess, but I don’t usually shoot in them. I had a special pair of glasses made for shooting but I can’t read a thing with them on. We were working at adjusting for an astigmatism to help get me to red dots vs red blobs. We’re close but I’ll be bringing in a slide mounted RMR to the next appointment to tweak the prescription.

I know plenty of folks that can’t do the progressive lenses, my father included.


_________________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last” - Winston Churchil
 
Posts: 3055 | Location: Middle-TN | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mcrimm:
Did you consider monovision correction? That's the way I have been corrected for 40 years. Distance in the right eye and reading in the left. About 1.5 diopters difference. Works great.


Yep. That's what I posted also. It's the answer to a lot of vision problems.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I was new to glasses, wore cheaters a bit but could not get used to moving my head so much instead of moving my eyes. I gave it about 10 days, just too frustrating for me. I’m having them changed to bifocals.
 
Posts: 286 | Location: Outside St. Louis | Registered: June 14, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
Wow! I guess everybody has a different experience. When I first got progressives (never had bifocals or trifocals, just used cheaters to read). The folks at the optometrist said not to drive with them right away. I was puzzled by this as they seemed perfect when I walked out the door. Walked around a bit, had no issues. Drove home and went back to work. Have never looked back.
 
Posts: 7221 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
Another non-adapter here..now at 51 I have lined bifocals....I really really tried the progressives, but it just made me sick and I couldn’t stay in the aperture.



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11574 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Cynic
Picture of charlie12
posted Hide Post
I had cataract surgery May 27 on my right eye. I chose to get the lens for distance and so far so good. I'm using some Dollar General 1.75 for reading and nothing for for distance. This surgery was a VA referral to a outside Dr. that did both my girlfriends eyes last year.
He told me everything looked great Thursday and to come back June 28 for my final visit to him.

The VA gave me lined bifocals a few years ago and the bifocal was too strong and nothing for intermediate vision. So I really only wore them to go to movie or watch TV. Driving with them wasn't too bad but I could read my phone or dash or my ham radios in my truck.

After my last visit June 28th with the surgeon I'll go back to the VA and see what glasses I can get.


_______________________________________________________
And no, junior not being able to hold still for 5 seconds is not a disability.



 
Posts: 13055 | Location: Pride, Louisiana | Registered: August 14, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Cummings Custom Refinishing
posted Hide Post
I have had them for years no problem. My wife has tried them 3 times and can't adjust to them at all


Cummings Custom Refinishing offers Quality Craftsmanship at affordable prices. Fully Lic FFL's for over 30 years
OFTEN IMITATED BUT NEVER DUPLICATED
423-639-8924
www.ccrrefinishing.com

 
Posts: 5213 | Location: Eastern Tn | Registered: March 29, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Progressive lens?

© SIGforum 2024