Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
No ethanol! |
Seems like it took DECADES to correct what was commonly known to be an unjust means to raise cash for Philly. Video at link as well. Philadelphia agrees to overhaul property seizure law PHILADELPHIA -- Philadelphia has agreed to overhaul its civil forfeiture laws as part of a proposed lawsuit settlement announced Tuesday, limiting what law enforcement officers can seize and how it can use the proceeds. The city's civil forfeiture law allows law enforcement officials to confiscate property if someone is suspected of a crime and to keep the proceeds for its coffers. The 2014 class action lawsuit, filed by the Institute for Justice, alleges that the law violates defendants' due process because of the lack of oversight and a financial incentive for the confiscations since the proceeds have been used to pay salaries. "Without any conviction or criminal charges, people are losing their property," said Darpana Sheth, a senior attorney for the Institute who directs its national initiative to end forfeiture abuse. "This decree completely transforms the Kafkaesque procedures with the notorious courtroom 478. It ensures judges not prosecutors oversee the forfeiture process and monitor it for fairness." The two consent decrees will have to be approved by a federal judge. Nationwide, lawsuits have been filed with mixed success alleging the state and local forfeiture laws are unconstitutional. The Institute will argue a case before the U.S. Supreme Court later this year in which an Indiana man is challenging the seizure of his car as an excessive fine. The Institute has said that Philadelphia's civil forfeiture practices are some of the most stringent in the country, averaging about $5.6 million in property seizures per year over the decade before it filed its lawsuit. Lead plaintiff Christos Sourovelis described being evicted from and almost losing his Somerton home after his son, who has no ownership stake in the house, was arrested for selling $40 worth of drugs. The city had agreed in 2015 in response to the same lawsuit to lessen its use of civil forfeiture to seize homes. Before that agreement, Philadelphia authorities filed 300 to 500 petitions annually to seize houses. Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney said the settlement will codify the city's decision last year to stop using the proceeds from forfeitures to fund its budget. Kenney said no forfeiture proceeds will be used to fund the police department's budget. "This is a good resolution because it reforms a system that, left unchecked, can prey upon the most vulnerable - people who, in many instances, have no understanding of their rights and no one to fight for them. In short, this settlement makes Philadelphia a more just city," Kenney wrote in a news release about the settlement. One of the Philadelphia consent decrees released Tuesday addresses what the existing and future proceeds from forfeitures can fund. Sheth said proceeds would no longer be used to pay salaries for prosecutors or law enforcement personnel, and instead will cover drug treatment and prevention programs. The decree also uses existing profits from past confiscations to set up a $3 million fund to reimburse people whose property was excessively seized, starting with those who were never convicted of a crime. Any remaining money will be used to fund community programs such as legal defense funds. The second decree would limit what law enforcement officials can confiscate. It would prohibit the seizure of property for simple drug possession. It would also bar the seizure of less than $1,000 in cash unless there is an arrest or evidence of illegal activity, and prohibit defendants from forfeiting cash less than $250 to the district attorney's office. Sheth said other changes will include having a judge oversee the civil proceedings, providing a prompt hearing for people to request the return of property, keeping better track of the property seized and better informing people of their rights and the process. ------------------ The plural of anecdote is not data. -Frank Kotsonis | ||
|
Oh stewardess, I speak jive. |
Anything that starts to unfuck the legalized-theft laws in this country is fantastic progress. Good for Philly, for a change. Let's hope the trend continues, in earnest, nationwide. | |||
|
Member |
It is incredible what I've read about this forfeiture. The wolves taking the hen house it many instances. Allot of corruption happening. Scary stuff, it would bankrupt me if that kind of "mistake" happened. | |||
|
Member |
IIRC, this is an offshoot of the RICO laws that the .gov begged and pleaded for with the promise to NEVER use against citizens. Riiiight.... Just like my Social Security card I got in the mid 60's with - in print at the bottom front - "Not to be used for identification". What is it that gives these megalomaniacs the right to disregard the BOR and the Constitution? Oh, I know - the old Roman saying, "Who guards the guards?" No accountability, no consequences. This is a good step in the right direction. Another good step would be to recognize the unconstitutionality outright and ban the practice with prejudice. Hopefully, like the concealed carry laws, it will eventually spread to the entire United States. | |||
|
10mm is The Boom of Doom |
The reimbursements should be financed by confiscating the homes and financial assets of the prosecutors who pushed these confiscations. Oh, that's unjust? Let them take it to court. Hearings to be scheduled in 99 years. You know how backed up the courts are. God Bless and Protect the Once and Future President, Donald John Trump. | |||
|
safe & sound |
How about every single person from start to finish. It's not just the prosecutors. Somebody had to supply them with cases. Every. Single. Person. | |||
|
10mm is The Boom of Doom |
^^^ Sounds good to me. God Bless and Protect the Once and Future President, Donald John Trump. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |