The World Health Organization (WHO), originally established as an advisory body, has a troubling history of health mismanagement and corruption. Of particular concern are the current negotiations, conducted behind closed doors and without substantial public input, which aim to transform the WHO into a controlling body with unilateral, legally binding authority over member states.

Yes, you read that correctly! The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations currently being negotiated by the WHO are specifically designed to override national sovereignty and transfer legally binding authority to the WHO.

This is NOT a conspiracy theory.

Here is the evidence – three official WHO documents (1,2,3).

The proposed changes to the WHO’s core nature and powers directly contradict and nullify the Joint Resolution signed by President Harry Truman in 1948. This resolution explicitly stated that the US is not bound to enact any specific legislative program regarding matters outlined in the WHO's Constitution.


Under the proposed amendments, membership in the WHO would impose legally binding requirements on the United States. This could force us to enact specific legislation that goes against the principles of the US Constitution, potentially infringing on our sovereignty and unalienable rights.

Here are a few excerpts from the International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) Final Report:

“The proposed amendments to these definitions could be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles.” (page 26)

“This proposal also renders mandatory the temporary and standing recommendations addressed under Articles 15 and 16.” (page 55)

“The proposed amendment to include a reference to temporary and standing recommendations seems to make application of these recommendations obligatory.” (page 67)

“This Committee is concerned that these proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of States Parties and give binding effects to what are supposed to be recommendations.” (page 68)

The 75th World Health Assembly adopted amendments to 5 articles of the International Health Regulations that dramatically reduced the time the 194 member nations will be allowed to reject future amendments. No signatures from leaders or approvals by any Parliament or Senate were required to enact those amendments into international law, which is legally binding on all nations. This happened in 2022, and it can happen again.

Continued membership in WHO is not just a matter of health policy, it's a matter of our constitutional rights. It is incompatible with the US Constitution and our legal system, a fact that should resonate deeply with all of us as citizens.


The overreach of power from the WHO could significantly impact Americans in the event of another pandemic, particularly if the WHO gains the authority to make unilateral decisions about healthcare options. As mentioned previously, under the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, the WHO could impose legally binding health measures on member states, including the United States, without needing approval from national governments or legislative bodies.

This shift could lead to several profound consequences:


Read the rest here: https://thetruthaboutcanceroff...rue&utm_medium=email

Anything that is part of the UN is evil. The UN is The Beast, no doubt in my mind.

Those commie bastards can kiss my entire ass.

And Biden’s handlers are undoubtedly encouraging the one-world bureaucrats, rather than resisting.

I don’t remember voting for these assholes.

And there are theories that they would a call a health emergency as an excuse to ban or limit all sorts of things like firearms, driving, meat, alcohol, socializing, expressing dissent, refusing vaccines, and on and on.

24 GOP Governors Tell Biden Not to Sign WHO Pandemic Agreement
‘These agreements would seek to elevate the WHO from an advisory body to a global authority in public health,’ the Republican governors wrote in a letter.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...eyMeAHspy%2BR6sGI%3D

quote:

Originally posted by jed7s9b:
And there are theories that they would a call a health emergency as an excuse to ban or limit all sorts of things like firearms, driving, meat, alcohol, socializing, expressing dissent, refusing vaccines, and on and on.

Perhaps they should come here, don some 'Blue Helmets' and try to enforce their tyranny...We'll see how that works out for them!

UN proposes, US Constitution disposes.

If the Chucklehead-in-Chief signs something and the US Senate does not confirm, it does not fly here in the US.

Ask Woodrow Wilson about that. His League of Nations did not pass Go, and so did not collect $200.

quote:

Originally posted by downtownv:
The World Health Organization (WHO), originally established as an advisory body, has a troubling history of health mismanagement and corruption.

I remember years ago, over a dozen years ago, when I heard a doctor give testimony about how the WHO came up with their conclusion that the United States was ranked 27th in overall healthcare in the world. They based most of the ranking process on DEI requirements rather than actual data on real-life healthcare. The WHO has been a leftist bullshit org for a long time.

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:

Perhaps they should come here, don some 'Blue Helmets' and try to enforce their tyranny...We'll see how that works out for them!

There was talk a number of years ago of blue helmets being invited to monitor our elections. Were they to show up in the future to enforce some kind of imposed tyranny, well blue makes for an easy to see target. The powers that run this country are trying to create a pretense of an outside higher authority interested in the global good for humanity while washing their hands of responsibility, while getting to do exactly what they want.

Truly they know they cannot deploy US military for a lot of reasons. But they think UN troops could be.

I think a lot of this is driven by foreigners who view the playing field being like their own homelands. They don't appreciate the American spirit...

I don't take orders from the UN