SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Navy or not, you can't fail to be impressed.
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Navy or not, you can't fail to be impressed. Login/Join 
Run Silent
Run Deep

Picture of Patriot
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FishOn:
My niece receives her commission today. She is off to SWO Nuke school and then on to an aircraft carrier to run the reactor. Thanks for posting that.


She’s in for the hardest year of her life…

I wish her luck!

When I went through nuke school, we started with 13 sections. Each section had 10-15 guys.

We graduated with 5 sections. The rest washed out…

I worked 15-20 hours a day to end with a 3.4 GPA.


_____________________________
Pledge allegiance or pack your bag!
The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
Spread my work ethic, not my wealth
 
Posts: 7128 | Location: South East, Pa | Registered: July 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lt CHEG
posted Hide Post
To most other countries, that ship is an aircraft carrier. We don’t even consider her part of our carrier fleet (admittedly it is a considerably smaller ship than one of our carriers) and we have 3 or 4 times as many carriers as the next closest navy. Truly no other Navy has so ruled the seas as our US Navy. Good bless our sailors!




“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
 
Posts: 5699 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: February 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Here's a 6:00 video of the ship tied up in Stockholm. On deck I saw lots of Ospreys, several Cobras, a couple Sea Hawks, and one Harrier.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDXyrHCrw8s
 
Posts: 16117 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
186,000 miles per second.
It's the law.




posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Patriot:
quote:
Originally posted by FishOn:
My niece receives her commission today. She is off to SWO Nuke school and then on to an aircraft carrier to run the reactor. Thanks for posting that.


She’s in for the hardest year of her life…

I wish her luck!

When I went through nuke school, we started with 13 sections. Each section had 10-15 guys.

We graduated with 5 sections. The rest washed out…

I worked 15-20 hours a day to end with a 3.4 GPA.


She's up for the challenge. She was a physics major which was fairly difficult. She's a go-getter.
 
Posts: 3289 | Registered: August 19, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Giftedly Outspoken
Picture of sigarms229
posted Hide Post
Very impressive. While I never served, I have had the pleasure on working on 2 of her sister ships, LHD 1 USS Wasp and LHD 5 USS Bataan while in port at Norfolk.

The ships and their crews are quite impressive.

quote:
To most other countries, that ship is an aircraft carrier.


While some of her sisters have recently functioned as "lighting carriers" with about twenty F-35's and only a few helo's onboard, the biggest issue why they can't function as true carriers is that they don't have any Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft (think E-2 Hawkeye on the regular carriers). Some of our allies with smaller carriers use helicopters in this role but as of right now the US doesn't have any carrier based aircraft that can fill this role other than the E-2 Hawkeye and that won't work on this platform.

Unless the US adopts a helicopter AEW for these ships or even the proposed EV-22 Osprey AEW aircraft, they will be more vulnerable to our enemies than a traditional carrier will be.



Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six
 
Posts: 4640 | Location: SouthCentral PA | Registered: December 05, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigarms229:
While some of her sisters have recently functioned as "lighting carriers" with about twenty F-35's and only a few helo's onboard, the biggest issue why they can't function as true carriers is that they don't have any Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft (think E-2 Hawkeye on the regular carriers). Some of our allies with smaller carriers use helicopters in this role but as of right now the US doesn't have any carrier based aircraft that can fill this role other than the E-2 Hawkeye and that won't work on this platform.

Unless the US adopts a helicopter AEW for these ships or even the proposed EV-22 Osprey AEW aircraft, they will be more vulnerable to our enemies than a traditional carrier will be.

There's a number of limitations with the 'lighting carrier' concept, and very reliant on shore based assets to conduct the catalog of carrier operations. Besides the lack of AEW aircraft, the air wing lacks EW aircraft, the lack of tanker assets drone or, aircraft; the variety of offensive operations are limited. Then there's the issue of magazines being too small, not sure how much this was changed with the non-well deck flight-I America-class but, the LPH/LPD's prior, the aircraft munitions were limited. The Navy is definitely trying to feel-out how to operate a smaller-deck carrier, will be interesting what results come about in the next 10-years.

Wondering where she was going to tie-up, Stockholm's deep water port is far away from it's downtown heart. There's a number of viewers who've uploaded their own videos, Sweden's Navy and Kearsarge are rolling out the carpet to the public in the capitol city prior to departing for the NATO exercise, they have her anchored in the basin right in the middle





 
Posts: 15321 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Needs a bigger boat
Picture of CaptainMike
posted Hide Post
Back in ye olden dinosaur tymmes, we wouldn't even have pulled into Norfolk with the hull looking like that. We would have anchored at Chesapeake Light and painted all visible surfaces, liberty be damned. The proportion of Bosun's mates and deck department is much lower these days under the minimum manning philosophy. But still, any rate can run a paint roller.



MOO means NO! Be the comet!
 
Posts: 2769 | Location: The Tidewater. VCOA. | Registered: June 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ChuckWall
posted Hide Post
Some quality seamanship to be sure. When we were leaving San Diego, my div. commander had the conn. A freighter was coming in and a bit out of lane leaving us in possible extremis.

Well, the Lt. thought putting the engine to astern was the right thing to do to avoid a collision. That's a violation of the maritime rules. He also backed over a buoy in SD harbor fouling and damaging our single screw. A violation of the Navy's rules.

Instead of going back to San Fran and our wives, we spent the next 3 weeks in drydock.


*************
MAGA
 
Posts: 5689 | Registered: February 20, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CaptainMike:
Back in ye olden dinosaur tymmes, we wouldn't even have pulled into Norfolk with the hull looking like that. We would have anchored at Chesapeake Light and painted all visible surfaces, liberty be damned. The proportion of Bosun's mates and deck department is much lower these days under the minimum manning philosophy. But still, any rate can run a paint roller.

Considering they had enough time transiting the Baltic, they could've dealt with those stains and presented the United States Navy in a better light.

I don't believe minimal manning has hit the PHIB's, that was a LCS concept; which will soon be out of the navy. My understanding its a likely combination of the Navy's maintenance attitude/policies of having the yard's handle such work while it's sailors are continually focused for their next quals and/or, recruitment/retention is so bad, every department is going to sea undermanned. Regardless, pulling into a foreign port looking like a soup sandwich, displays a lack of pride and attention from leadership.
 
Posts: 15321 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted Hide Post
I thought they retired the Harrier years ago.
 
Posts: 7417 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
I recall the first time I saw a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier up close.

I stood there recalling when I saw an America class aircraft carrier as a child. I recall thinking then “Holy Jesus this thing is big.”

As I stood on the quay, before that leviathan, and I thought “Holy Jesus this thing is big.”





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32572 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Navy or not, you can't fail to be impressed.

© SIGforum 2024