Topic ClosedGo | New | Find | Notify | Tools |
goodheart |
Andy McCarthy is right in his column today on NRO: The indictment is a weak and wrong response to disinformation campaign by Russia. Selections:
Link _________________________ “Remember, remember the fifth of November!" | |||
|
| Be not wise in thine own eyes  |
^^^^^ And there it is in a nutshell. Reposted the key points for those with Attention Deficit Disorder.
“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” Pres. Select, Joe Biden “Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021 | |||
|
Dirty Boat Guy |
While I agree in general with that article, I can also see the possibility that this could be used by those cronies guilty of crimes to shirk responsibility. "Oh golly gee... those mean ol' russkies did that and made it look like we did... just to divide us." A penny saved is a government oversight. | |||
|
| Live Slow, Die Whenever  |
 "I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them." - John Wayne in "The Shootist" | |||
|
| wishing we were congress |
Christopher Steele had completed his work for Fusion GPS after the election (supposedly). But Steele put out one more report dated 13 Dec 2016. It is on pages 34 and 35 of the Steele dossier. In that last report, Steele identifies a Russian businessman (Aleksei Gubarov) as stealing data, planting bugs, and “altering operations” against the DEM party leadership. After Buzzfeed published the dossier in January 2017, Aleksej Gubarev filed lawsuits within a few weeks. Gubarev sued Buzzfeed in the U.S., and he sued Chistopher Steele in London. Gubarev now seeks depositions and documents from Fusion GPS as part of the lawsuit. Fusion GPS (Glenn Simpson) is trying to avoid complying with a subpoena from Gubarev. There is a Wash DC judge who will decide whether Fusion has to comply, and that judge was appointed to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia less than 4 months ago. Judge Trevor McFadden was appointed by President Donald Trump. Fusion is trying to force Judge McFadden to recuse himself. McFadden has refused to do so. http://dailycaller.com/2018/02...-fusion-gps-lawsuit/ Steele and Glenn Simpson must be especially regretting that last report.  | |||
|
Member |
The NRO were the original Trump haters. How far we have come. "Fixed fortifications are monuments to mans stupidity" - George S. Patton | |||
|
| goodheart |
There are still those on NRO I won’t read, but McCarthy is a national treasure as is Victor Davis Hansen. _________________________ “Remember, remember the fifth of November!" | |||
|
| wishing we were congress |
It is not clear how much money Mueller is wasting in his "investigation". He started in May 2017 and spent $6.7 million in the first 4.5 months. $3.2 mil was for Mueller team, and $3.5 mil for FBI/DoJ support. If that rate is consistent for a year, that would be $18 mil per year. The Trump 2019 budget that was recently submitted has $10 mil for Mueller in FY 2019. | |||
|
Festina Lente |
Ruh roh Andy... Big trouble if this pans out. Mike Cernovich tweets the following: Huge scoop. Like my other big stories (Susan Rice, security clearances, Conyers) will take media a long time to confirm. You know how Peter Strzok's system didn't back up. You know why? McCabe altered his 302 of the Flynn interview, and deleted all history of revisions. The FBI cannot provide a *clean* history of revisions for the 302 interview with General Flynn. That's why Judge Emmett Sullivan, who is very tough on unethical prosecutors, had ordered the Special Counsel to disclose exculpatory evidence, which would include these revisions. The IG knows McCabe changed Peter Strzok 302 / notes with General Flynn. Yet issuing a report to this effect would call thousands of FBI investigations into question. It's full on freak-out mode, as no one know how to spin this. Why did a federal judge order Muller to disclose exculpatory evidence AFTER Flynn pled guilty? Do you know how unusual this is? Flynn waived the right to exculpatory evidence in his plea deal. That's because the 302 was altered, and everyone knows it. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...-destroyed-evidence/ NRA Life Member - "Fear God and Dreadnaught" | |||
|
| wishing we were congress |
that is gigantic if true. note it says "The IG knows". That sounds like DoJ IG Horowitz just a few posts back, we were kicking around why Judge Contreras was recused from Flynn case. Contreras took the Flynn plea agreement. The judge that replaced Contreras was Judge Emmett Sullivan bama has a post related to this on page 63 ************** BTW Sara Carter on 30 Jan 2018: "I have been told tonight by a number of sources ... that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302s," Carter told host Sean Hannity. https://pjmedia.com/trending/r...ts-change-302-forms/ | |||
|
| I believe in the principle of Due Process  |
Consider that whatever is said in the 302s has been heretofore treated as equivalent to sworn statements by the witness/interviewee, and how the charge of lying is evaluated, this is incalculably awful. If you tell the FBI agent the light was red, and (s)he writes in the 302 for whatever reason you said “the light was green,” you may be in trouble. Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me. When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown | |||
|
| wishing we were congress |
"The IG knows" I wonder if that is in reference to the lost texts from 14 Dec 2016 to 17 May 2017? Flynn interview was 24 January 2017. Mueller officially started as special counsel on 17 May 2017. The DoJ IG found some of the lost texts. Maybe he found other material also. Horowitz wouldn't send them to Nunes, he sent them to DoJ. | |||
|
Member |
Yes, it is a weak response but no it has not been a counterintelligence investigation. If it had been a counterintelligence investigation, I would feel much better about the DOJ and our intel community in general, but this was about the weaponization of the DOJ by Democrats against Trump. A true CI investigation would uncover the Hillary/Obama/Russian collusion, which raises the next point. There is no way that Russia could have pulled off all that McCarthy alleges without significant help from within the United States. . | |||
|
| goodheart |
McCarthy for years has been on the side of fighting terrorism as a war and not with criminal procedures. I think this article (and it's worth reading the whole thing) extends this idea to counterintelligence: it should not be fought with a "special counsel" at all; it should not be treated as a crime but as an act of war by a state agent, not carried out in the courts. _________________________ “Remember, remember the fifth of November!" | |||
|
| The Velvet Voicebox |
Joe DiGenova on WMAL 2-16-18. No Joey D segment for 2-19-18. Apologies for the adv ditty at the beginning. Could not cut it. "All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in single words: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Sir Winston Churchill "The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose." --James Earl Jones | |||
|
| wishing we were congress |
article by Byron York as usual you need to read the whole thing to put it in perspective http://www.washingtonexaminer....ment/article/2649445 a highlight tho: First, Facebook said the Russian operation bought about 3,000 ads, spending about $100,000 on Facebook and Instagram combined. That is compared to about $81 million the Clinton and Trump campaigns spent on Facebook and Instagram combined. Looking at key states, the total spent on ads targeting Wisconsin was $1,979, according to Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr. Ad spending in Michigan was $823. In Pennsylvania, it was $300. as far as the new indictment is concerned, there is good reason to stay calm | |||
|
| I believe in the principle of Due Process |
LAW How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption Did Robert Mueller’s office withhold other evidence in Michael Flynn’s prosecution, either from the FISA court or from Flynn’s attorneys? On Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works. Just a week ago, and thus before Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,” Washington Examiner columnist Byron York detailed the oddities of Flynn’s case. The next day, former assistant U.S. attorney and National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy connected more of the questionable dots. York added even more details a couple of days later. Together these articles provide the backdrop necessary to understand the significance of Sullivan’s order on Friday. What’s Happened in the Michael Flynn Case So Far To recap: On November 30, 2017, prosecutors working for Mueller charged former Trump national security advisor Flynn with lying to FBI agents. The following day, Flynn pled guilty before federal judge Rudolph Contreras. Less than a week later — and without explanation — Flynn’s case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. One of Sullivan’s first orders of business was to enter a standing order, on December 12, 2017, directing “the government to produce to defendant in a timely manner – including during plea negotiations – any evidence in its possession that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.” Sullivan’s standing order further directed the government, if it “has identified any information which is favorable to the defendant but which the government believes not to be material,” to “submit such information to the Court for in camera review.” Sullivan enters identical standing orders as a matter of course in all of his criminal cases, as he explained in a 2016 Cardozo Law Review article: “Following the Stevens case, I have issued a standing Brady Order for each criminal case on my docket, updating it in reaction to developments in the law.” A Brady order directs the government to disclose all exculpatory evidence to defense counsel, as required by Brady v. Maryland. The Stevens case, of course, is the government’s corrupt prosecution of the late senator Ted Stevens—an investigation and prosecution which, as Sullivan put it, “were permeated by the systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence. . . .” While the December standing order represented Sullivan’s normal practice, as both McCarthy and York noted, Flynn had already pled guilty. In his plea agreement, Flynn agreed to “forego the right to any further discovery or disclosures of information not already provided at the time of the entry of Flynn’s guilty plea.” On Wednesday, however, the attorneys in the Flynn case presented the court an agreed-upon protective order governing the use of the material — including sensitive material — the special counsel’s office provides Flynn. This indicates Mueller’s team will not fight Sullivan’s standing order based on the terms of Flynn’s plea agreement. Why Bombshells Are Likely Ahead With a protective order in place, Flynn’s attorneys should start receiving the required disclosures from the special counsel’s office. There is reason to believe these will include some bombshells. First, we know from the recently released GOP House Intelligence Committee memo and the Grassley-Graham criminal referral of Christopher Steele, the FBI and DOJ withheld significant (and material, in my view) information in seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to conduct surveillance on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. There is cause to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.” Was other evidence withheld, either from the FISA court or from Flynn’s attorneys in negotiating a plea? Again, there is reason to believe so, given the players involved and the facts already uncovered. Remember, the special counsel charged Flynn with lying to FBI agents on January 24. While the charge did not identify the FBI agents involved, we know that Peter Strzok conducted the January interview that eventually led to the criminal case against Flynn. Strzok formed a part of Mueller’s team until he was removed following the discovery of hostile text messages concerning Trump, including a planned “insurance policy” should Trump win the White House. Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls for his ouster. Mueller must now provide Flynn all exculpatory evidence: Significantly, if the information is favorable to Flynn but the special counsel’s office believes it is immaterial, government attorneys must nonetheless provide the evidence to Sullivan to allow him to make the call. In other words, Mueller’s team cannot unilaterally decide what evidence matters, as the Department of Justice did in applying to the FISA court for a surveillance warrant on Page while withholding the key fact that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee paid for information crucial to the application. This Whole Thing Could Bring further Abuse to Light No one knows yet what the evidence will show. However, there are enough shady characters involved to believe there will be something of significance. Then what? Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor and author of “Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice,” writes that Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea and suggests that Sullivan, as “the country’s premier jurist experienced in the abuses of our Department of Justice, . . . is the best person to confront the egregious government misconduct that has led to and been perpetrated by the Mueller-Weissmann ‘investigation’ and to right the injustices that have arisen from it.” Friday’s order suggests Sullivan is ready to do just that. That order consisted of an updated standing order detailing the government’s obligations under Brady. On the surface, Friday’s order seems inconsequential, but in comparing the December 12, 2017, version to the February 16, 2018, version, one substantive change stood out. It was subtle, but significant given the posture of this case: The revised version added one sentence specifying that the government’s obligation to produce evidence material either to the defendant’s guilt or punishment “includes producing, during plea negotiations, any exculpatory evidence in the government’s possession.” While it is impossible to know whether Sullivan modified the standing order in response to special concerns in the Flynn case, it differs from the model text he included in his 2016 article, as well as the standing order he used most recently in a criminal case from August 2017. It is significant because it indicates that, if the government did not provide Flynn material evidence during plea negotiations, Flynn has grounds to withdraw his plea. Sullivan’s revised standing order made that point clear, too—well, at least for Flynn’s lawyers. To explain: The Supreme Court has never addressed the question of whether a defendant may withdraw a guilty plea if the prosecution withholds exculpatory evidence during plea negotiations. The lower federal courts are split on this question. In his revised standing order issued on Friday, Sullivan dropped a lengthy footnote, detailing the case law and setting forth his position that, if material exculpatory evidence is withheld during plea negotiations, a defendant is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea. Flynn’s attorneys now know what to do should Mueller’s team disclose such evidence. After the spanking Sullivan gave the prosecutors in the Stevens case, Mueller is on notice as well. Link Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me. When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown | |||
|
| Member |
"Sullivan enters identical standing orders as a matter of course in all of his criminal cases, as he explained in a 2016 Cardozo Law Review article: “Following the Stevens case, I have issued a standing Brady Order for each criminal case on my docket, updating it in reaction to developments in the law.” http://thefederalist.com/2018/...-federal-corruption/ Then there's this:
https://gellerreport.com/2018/...bi-302-mccable.html/ ____________________________________________________ The butcher with the sharpest knife has the warmest heart. | |||
|
| Member |
The more I read about Sidney Powell, the more I like her. Here's an excerpt on Andrew Weissmann from her takedown of Mueller's DNC farce. How Weissmann isn't in jail, much less disbarred, is beyond me. http://thehill.com/opinion/whi...e-very-interested-in ----------------- Mueller tapped a different sort of prosecutor to lead his investigation — his long-time friend and former counsel, Andrew Weissmann. He is not just a “tough” prosecutor. Time after time, courts have reversed Weissmann’s most touted “victories” for his tactics. This is hardly the stuff of a hero in the law. Weissmann, as deputy and later director of the Enron Task Force, destroyed the venerable accounting firm of Arthur Andersen LLP and its 85,000 jobs worldwide — only to be reversed several years later by a unanimous Supreme Court. Next, Weissmann creatively criminalized a business transaction between Merrill Lynch and Enron. Four Merrill executives went to prison for as long as a year. Weissmann’s team made sure they did not even get bail pending their appeals, even though the charges Weissmann concocted, like those against Andersen, were literally unprecedented. Weissmann’s prosecution devastated the lives and families of the Merrill executives, causing enormous defense costs, unimaginable stress and torturous prison time. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the mass of the case. Weissmann quietly resigned from the Enron Task Force just as the judge in the Enron Broadband prosecution began excoriating Weissmann’s team and the press began catching on to Weissmann’s modus operandi. Mueller knows this history. Is this why he tapped Weissmann to target Paul Manafort? As Attorney General Jackson foretold: “Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people that he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.” Manafort, a Trump associate, is simply a small step in Weissmann’s quest to impugn this presidency or to reverse the results of the 2016 election. Never mind that months of investigation by multiple entities have produced no evidence of "collusion." Mueller’s rare, predawn raid of Manafort’s home — a fearsome treat usually reserved for mobsters and drug dealers — is textbook Weissmann terrorism. And of course, the details were leaked — another illegal tactic. Weissmann is intent on indicting Manafort. It won’t matter that Manafort knows the Trump campaign did not collude with the Russians. Weissman will pressure Manafort to say whatever satisfies Weissmann’s perspective. Perjury is only that which differs from Weissmann’s “view” of the “evidence” — not the actual truth. We all lose from Weissmann’s involvement. First, the truth plays no role in Weissmann’s quest. Second, respect for the rule of law, simple decency and following the facts do not appear in Weissmann’s playbook. Third, and most important, all Americans lose whenever our judicial system becomes a weapon to reward political friends and punish political foes. It is long past the due date for Mueller to clean up his team — or Weissmann to resign — as a sign that the United States is a nation of laws that are far more important than one Weissmann. | |||
|
| I believe in the principle of Due Process |
That is the same report from Cernovich as before, I believe on conservative treehouse. Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me. When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 308 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed© SIGforum 2024