Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
His Royal Hiney |
1) You say people should be careful to not have a myopic view that relies too much on base numbers and not overall context. I refer you to your OP where, to my point of view, you myopically focused on the $24K standard deduction as the crux of your woes. You said, "I just finished our taxes for 2018, and the $24K standard deduction formula was absolutely brutal for us. We usually get around $4500 back, and this year we will be paying $1744, making '18 the first year in I can't-remember-how-long (possibly ever) that we owe. Property taxes, mortgage interest, investment advisor fees, charitable contributions, etc. etc....all of it, it's all moot if you don't have total deductions in excess of $24K. We were close at around $23K, but not quite there" That's all I can go by. That's the heart of what you said. And when I read that, I go, "How can anyone complain of the $24k standard deduction because they have only $23k in itemized deductions?" Under the old rule, if you had $23k in itemized deductions, you took $23k in deductions. But under the new rule, if you have $23k in itemized deductions, you get to take $24k in deductions. Star Traveller appears to understand what you were saying and it has to do with personal exemptions. Since you incorrectly attributed the 24k standard deduction as driving your tax issue and not personal exemptions, you can't fault me for saying you don't understand numbers because that's what understanding numbers mean: correctly identifying the drivers of the numerical result. You also say "Attractive base tax rates don't tell the story in a complex return." Yes, but there is a concept called cetus paribus which analyzes things one at a time while holding everything else constant. And, in any case, you can't give part of your situation and then fall back on "it's way more complex than that" if you don't like what's said to you. The only way, you could make a definitive comparison is to run your current numbers against the 2017 tax rules and you can see the total difference and you can determine where the differences lie. It does appear you have narrowed it down to the personal exemption which you didn't mention in your OP. But I still think plugging your numbers into the 2017 program will be a worthwhile exercise. "It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946. | |||
|
It's not easy being me |
What are these "taxes" of which you speak??? ..........And why do I hear helicopters above my house that I can't see??? Just kidding, our CPA has our info. Yes, I agree with certain people above that owning a business is not always fun. _______________________________________ Flammable, Inflammable, or Nonflammable....... Hell, either it Flams or it doesn't!! (George Carlin) | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |