Do you guys think kav will be confirmed Now?

Yes or no

quote:

Originally posted by oddball:
I like the cut of his jib-
...and Trump has shown extreme confidence in the last couple of days.

One thing about Trump, is that he is usually 2-3 steps ahead of the Dems. He is not intimidated, and is going after these crooks.

quote:

Originally posted by 10x Sniper:
Do you guys think kav will be confirmed Now?

Yes or no

Have you been reading this thread? Yes or no?

quote:

Originally posted by 10x Sniper:
Do you guys think kav will be confirmed Now?

Yes or no

Absolutely. (Yes, if absolutely isn't good enough.)

I just hope that all the Dims vote "NO" so that the maximum number of them get crucified in the midterm elections.

I vote no
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
to Blasey Ford being confirmed to the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh will be confirmed. Then the fireworks start

Yes - I’m not sure what else Trump can do to prove to the non—believers here that he’s not just some chump who was lucky to win in 2016.

He didn’t get where he is in life by just letting things happen. I imagine he’s managing 3-12 months in advance, it not further out. He has information on people that is likely unrivaled from his years of watching the political process.

quote:

Originally posted by 226Reasons:
Kavanaugh will be confirmed. Then the fireworks start

Ginsburg will be ‘interesting’ to say the least.

If after that "clarification" of Dems' whatever-it-takes-to-win tactics the Dems still take the House then we are truly a pussified nation.

These excerpts are promising...

Authorities in Maryland on Friday said they were prepared to conduct a state-level criminal investigation into sexual assault allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh -- provided that a victim comes forward.

The disclosure by Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas Manger and Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy came Friday, the same day that President Trump ordered the FBI to conduct a limited "supplemental" investigation.

But Manger and McCarthy noted that prosecution was unlikely in Maryland because authorities would have to apply the law that existed at the time of the offense, not the law that exists now, Baltimore's FOX 45 News reported.

“For example, in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a one-year statute of limitations,” they wrote.

Link: http://www.foxnews.com/politic...files-complaint.html

Maryland legislators, all Democrats, wanted to have authorities investigate the claims against Judge Kavanaugh and felt that they had standing as a third party to initiate an investigation. WRONG!

Saw this on twitter, if true...

quote:

Originally posted by Ogie:
Maryland legislators, all Democrats, wanted to have authorities investigate the claims against Judge Kavanaugh and felt that they had standing as a third party to initiate an investigation. WRONG!

These are some seriously stupid people if they actually believed that.

^^^

they're elected by the people of MD - they're not that bright to begin with

My wife, who is very good at forming her own opinions and drawing her own conclusions, said she felt Ford was a total fake with her wounded bird, little valley girl routine. After listening to Judge Kavanaugh’s statement to the Judiciary Committee, she shook her head and said the Democrat members should crawl back under the rocks from whence they came.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
"I feel portraying her as much of a victim as Kavanaugh due to the Democrats power lust is a damn smart move"

and there's the rub

The REPs have a tough election in about 5 weeks time.

More women vote than men. Many women have been intuitively sympathetic w Ford.

The REPs may have to win the immediate battle, and then settle w the guilty after the election.
.

Make no mistake. Those in tight races are looking at polling numbers, and trying to figure out what course will save their own hides. That's what politicians, on both sides do, and always have done.

quote:

Originally posted by 10x Sniper:
Do you guys think kav will be confirmed Now?

Yes or no

Yes, I think he will... but I'm only at a 60/40 confidence level.
Flake is such a flake... and I think his opportunity to capitalize on his Senate seat would require a no vote.
I actually think Collins/ Murkowski will vote yes.

quote:

Those in tight races are looking at polling numbers, and trying to figure out what course will save their own hides. That's what politicians, on both sides do, and always have done.

Judge Kavanaugh has lost ground in the polls, which will give cover to wavering Democrats in tight races. He only needs Republicans... but can only afford to lose ONE.

The cockroach has returned


Fired FBI director James Comey has once again returned to the spotlight, this time in the form of an op-ed published the New York Times where Comey argues that the FBI will have no problem investigating decades-old allegations against Brett Kavanaugh in the next week.

In the opinion piece, titled, “James Comey: The F.B.I. Can Do This,” Comey urges Americans to put their trust in the FBI as they seek to investigate uncorroborated sexual misconduct claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“President Trump’s decision to order a one-week investigation into sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, his Supreme Court nominee, comes in a time of almost indescribable pain and anger, lies and attacks,” Comey writes.

He continues by listing his grievances against President Trump and Brett Kavanaugh, then blaming Republican voters for not sharing his opinions on the two men.

We live in a world where the president routinely attacks the F.B.I. because he fears its work. He calls for his enemies to be prosecuted and his friends freed. We also live in a world where a sitting federal judge channels the president by shouting attacks at the Senate committee considering his nomination and demanding to know if a respected senator has ever passed out from drinking. We live in a world where the president is an accused serial abuser of women, who was caught on tape bragging about his ability to assault women and now likens the accusations against his nominee to the many “false” accusations against him.

Most disturbingly, we live in a world where millions of Republicans and their representatives think nearly everything in the previous paragraph is O.K.

Comey, who has attempted to make himself into a nonpartisan hero, is now attacking Republican voters for not being sufficiently bothered by Kavanaugh “shouting attacks at the Senate committee,” never mind the fact that he just had to endure a week of utter hell as his name and reputation was destroyed, he was relentlessly smeared in the media, and his family received violent messages and threats.

No, the real victim here is the poor members of the Senate, because Kavanaugh occasionally raised his voice to protest the vile attacks against him.

The fired FBI director’s real point in penning this article, however, is to assure the liberal readership of the Times that if nothing else has stopped Kavanaugh’s confirmation, the FBI can.

Comey is literally bragging about how the FBI has the power to do the Democrats’ dirty work for them and stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation. “Although the process is deeply flawed, and apparently designed to thwart the fact-gathering process, the F.B.I. is up for this. It’s not as hard as Republicans hope it will be.”

Comey then brags about the FBI’s power, writing that it can “speak to scores of people in a few days,” “confront people with testimony and other accounts,” and “[test] them and [push] them in a professional way.”

“Yes, the alleged incident occurred 36 years ago. But F.B.I. agents know time has very little to do with memory,” Comey writes, citing the fact that people always remember how the weather is on their wedding day, seemingly comparing getting married to attending a drunken teenage party.

Comey then writes that FBI agents know that “little lies point to bigger lies” and then accuses Kavanaugh of “obvious lies…about the meaning of words in a yearbook.”

In the final paragraph, Comey concludes the op-ed with a barely veiled warning.

Once they start interviewing, every witness knows the consequences. It is one thing to have your lawyer submit a statement on your behalf. It is a very different thing to sit across from two F.B.I. special agents and answer their relentless questions. Of course, the bureau won’t have subpoena power, only the ability to knock on doors and ask questions. But most people will speak to them. Refusal to do so is its own kind of statement.

There are a number of reasons why someone approached by the FBI wouldn’t want to submit to, as Comey himself says, “relentless” questioning. Chief among them would be the fact that many people honestly do not remember what occurred 36 years ago and don’t want to talk to FBI agents about their hazy memories of high school parties that occurred over three decades ago.

But it’s impossible to read what Comey wrote and not think that there’s a more sinister implication–if you don’t want to talk to the FBI, maybe you have something to hide.

We are now in full-on totalitarian “nothing to hide, nothing to fear” territory. The left will clearly stop at nothing to destroy Kavanaugh–let’s hope their dirty tactics don’t work.


https://www.breitbart.com/big-...rica-from-kavanaugh/

quote:

Once they start interviewing, every witness knows the consequences. It is one thing to have your lawyer submit a statement on your behalf. It is a very different thing to sit across from two F.B.I. special agents and answer their relentless questions. Of course, the bureau won’t have subpoena power, only the ability to knock on doors and ask questions. But most people will speak to them. Refusal to do so is its own kind of statement.

Given this type of probe and the FBI's 'questionable' ethics in the past few years, I wouldn't talk to these clowns about anything.

Comey's quite the attention whore and narcissist isn't he? Just go away Jim. your 15 minutes were over a long time ago.

quote:

We live in a world where the president routinely attacks the F.B.I. because he fears its work. He calls for his enemies to be prosecuted and his friends freed. We also live in a world where a sitting federal judge channels the president by shouting attacks at the Senate committee considering his nomination and demanding to know if a respected senator has ever passed out from drinking. We live in a world where the president is an accused serial abuser of women, who was caught on tape bragging about his ability to assault women and now likens the accusations against his nominee to the many “false” accusations against him.

Most disturbingly, we live in a world where millions of Republicans and their representatives think nearly everything in the previous paragraph is O.K.

Sorry, Mr. Comey... but we must live in different worlds.