Townhall.com
Walter Williams
February 14, 2018

Carter G. Woodson, noted scholar, historian and educator, created "Negro History Week" in 1926, which became Black History Month in 1976. Woodson chose February because it coincided with the birthdays of black abolitionist Frederick Douglass and President Abraham Lincoln. Americans should be proud of the tremendous gains made since emancipation. Black Americans, as a group, have made the greatest gains, over some of the highest hurdles, in a shorter span of time than any other racial group in mankind's history.

What's the evidence? If one totaled black income and thought of us as a separate nation with our own gross domestic product, black Americans would rank among the world's 20 richest nations. It was a black American, Colin Powell, who, as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, headed the world's mightiest military. There are a few black Americans who are among the world's richest and most famous personalities. The significance of these achievements is that in 1865, neither a former slave nor a former slave owner would have believed that such gains would be possible in a little over a century. As such, it speaks well of the intestinal fortitude of a people. Just as importantly, it speaks well of a nation in which such gains were possible. Those gains would have been impossible anywhere other than the U.S.

Putting greater emphasis on black successes in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds is far superior to focusing on grievances and victimhood. Doing so might teach us some things that could help us today. Black education today is a major problem. Let's look at some islands of success from yesteryear, when there was far greater racial discrimination and blacks were much poorer.

From the late 1800s to 1950, some black schools were models of academic achievement. Black students at Washington's racially segregated Paul Laurence Dunbar High School, as early as 1899, outscored white students in the District of Columbia schools on citywide tests. Dr. Thomas Sowell's research in "Education: Assumptions Versus History" documents similar excellence at Baltimore's Frederick Douglass High School, Atlanta's Booker T. Washington High School, Brooklyn's Albany Avenue School, New Orleans' McDonogh 35 High School and others. These excelling students weren't solely members of the black elite; most had parents who were manual laborers, domestic servants, porters and maintenance men. Academic excellence was obtained with skimpy school budgets, run-down buildings, hand-me-down textbooks and often 40 or 50 students in a class.

Alumni of these schools include Thurgood Marshall, the first black Supreme Court justice (Frederick Douglass), Gen. Benjamin Davis, Dr. Charles Drew, a blood plasma innovator, Robert C. Weaver, the first black Cabinet member, Sen. Edward Brooke, William Hastie, the first black federal judge (Dunbar), and Nobel laureate Martin Luther King Jr. (Booker T. Washington). These examples of pioneering success raise questions about today's arguments about what's needed for black academic success. Education experts and civil rights advocates argue that for black academic excellence to occur, there must be racial integration, small classes, big budgets and modern facilities. But earlier black academic successes put a lie to that argument.

In contrast with yesteryear, at today's Frederick Douglass High School, only 9 percent of students test proficient in English, and only 3 percent do in math. At Paul Laurence Dunbar, 12 percent of pupils are proficient in reading, and 5 percent are proficient in math. At Booker T. Washington, the percentages are 20 in English and 18 in math. In addition to low academic achievement, there's a level of violence and disrespect to teachers and staff that could not have been imagined, much less tolerated, at these schools during the late 1800s and the first half of the 20th century.

Many black political leaders are around my age, 81, such as Rep. Maxine Waters, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and Jesse Jackson. Their parents and other authorities would have never accepted the grossly disrespectful, violent behavior that has become the norm at many black schools. Their silence and support of the status quo makes a mockery of black history celebrations and represents a betrayal of epic proportions to the blood, sweat and tears of our ancestors in their struggle to make today's educational opportunities available.

Link

As usual, Mr. Williams lays it on the line and puts the blame where it belongs--on the prevalent "Black Culture". I don't believe there is any significant difference in the innate ability of Blacks to learn and perform compared to other races, but there is definitely a difference in their attitude toward it. They can call it "acting White" if they want to, but they need to do more of it.

flashguy

Are the ideas, values and principles of western, mostly Christian, democratic culture hewn over many centuries in the crucible of hard chance, important because they are “white” or because they have shown the way to freedom, equality, prosperity, justice, and security, albeit so far imperfectly?

Well, in my opinion the connection to "White" is of little importance--it may have historical value but no significance today. The fact that those ideas and values have proven to be successful over time should be all that counts.

flashguy

quote:

Well, in my opinion the connection to "White" is of little importance--it may have historical value but no significance today. The fact that those ideas and values have proven to be successful over time should be all that counts.

That shouldn't even be controversial. If we go down the other road--we're all white supremacists no matter what we believe or do--then we're screwed.

Thank you Mr. Freeman. African-American history is deeply woven throughout the fabric of American history with much left to be told. To relegate it to a month is to make that portion of America's story an appendage and thus somwhat less than vital.

Silent

Do we have any History left in America?

Wallace asked, "How are we going to stop racism?"

WHO wants it to stop?

Certainly not the Democrat Party! Sheesh - they need racism to hang on to a significant percentage of their voting base.

Not so-called "Civil Rights" groups. Their entire existence depends upon racism - or, rather, the perceived racism that they insist is still prevalent in our society.

How about folks like Leslie Jones? Everywhere she goes, she displays a horrible attitude. And, when someone shows that they don't like it, she has the handy excuse, "They racist!" What a great tool: "I'm not an asshole of a person, the people I treat badly are just racist!"