SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What do we like for all in one printers?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What do we like for all in one printers? Login/Join 
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted
I don't really print at home, but the wife is a realtor and uses her print/copy/scan every day. She has an HP that has been good but is getting print head errors a lot.

I recall some printer that hold a ton of ink or something, doesn't need cartridges that much. Just don't know the brand.

Looking for any recommendations.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Team Apathy
posted Hide Post
I’ve used all the main brands and my current AIO unit is my favorite… it is an Epson Ecotank model. The ink lasts a ton longer than inkjets and is much cheaper than both cartridges and toner for lasers. It can print photos which our last printer couldn’t (it was a color laser), though it doesn’t print as fast.

I’ll never do HP again. They ALWAYS have issues. Our last one never wanted to print and was exceedingly finicky when using AirPrint. The Epson just works.

Our particular model doesn’t have an Automatic Document Feeder but other models do if that is needed.
 
Posts: 6520 | Location: Modesto, CA | Registered: January 27, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
quote:
They ALWAYS have issues. Our last one never wanted to print and was exceedingly finicky when using AirPrint. The Epson just works.


The Ecotank is what I was thinking of. Thanks, we are looking at models now.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Scientific Beer Geek
posted Hide Post
I have an older Brother ink jet that prints, copies, scans, and Faxes. It is a good home printer but it wastes a lot of ink when it performs its automatic cleaning. You burn through ink even if you are not printing.

I would also look into the Epson Ecotank if your wife does a lot of printing.

Just my experience,

Mike


__________________________

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants to see us happy." - Benjamin Franklin
 
Posts: 2084 | Location: Philadelphia Suburbs | Registered: August 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have 2 Brother laser machines that I am very pleased with. The first is a black and white all in one for more mundane tasks as the toner cartridges for monochrome machines are much less expensive for day to day printing that doesn't require color. The second is a laser color printer only for pictures that require higher color rendition. This machine has higher resolution than the all in ones.
Going with laser on both machines greatly reduces the common issues of plugged ink lines and much of the cleaning related to inks. Toners are a bit more expensive but I like the convenience.



The “POLICE"
Their job Is To Save Your Ass,
Not Kiss It

The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says "go away" in any language - Clint Smith
 
Posts: 2985 | Location: See der Rabbits, Iowa | Registered: June 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If you are printing a lot, a laser is much better than an inkjet.

Brothers and HP are my go-to for business all in one printers.

I am running decades old HP lasers.
 
Posts: 4801 | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
When I was in business, nothing but HP and that's still true now that I'm retired.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
They're after my Lucky Charms!
Picture of IrishWind
posted Hide Post
I just bought an EcoTank (2800) for home use. So far I am very impressed with the print and scan ability. Plus it connects to the router at home, so everyone can use it without having to either send me the docs to print, or mess with the USB cable to connect. And the tank ability looks like a winner. My first photo printer used separate cartridges for C/M/Y inks. And while they tended to run out at the same time, it was nice to use all of one ink up before needing to replace it. And the EcoTank gets rid of the need for cartridges.


Lord, your ocean is so very large and my divos are so very f****d-up
Dirt Sailors Unite!
 
Posts: 25075 | Location: NoVa | Registered: May 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
At work:
All of our MFP (multi-function printer) are HP, but they're expensive, large & the toner is quite high as well.
Our print only printers are all Brother & much more reasonable for toner.

I think if we were to need to replace one of the 2 HP MFPs here, we'd likely go with a Brother. But supply is quite low, with long lead times on new printers.
Otherwise, we encourage our users to make use of our commercial MFPs (Canon very large MFPs)




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16278 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get my pies
outta the oven!

Picture of PASig
posted Hide Post
None of them are great.

Do you HAVE to get an all in one or do you just THINK you need one.

A small laser and a separate scanner/copier is a much better setup.


 
Posts: 35151 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
If you are printing a lot, a laser is much better than an inkjet.


This, I only use Brother with auto-feed in my CPA business. Ink Jets are a waste of money for business use. Also, NEVER use cheap toners as I have lost 2 laser printers using cheap toner. I print about 10,000 pages a year.


__________________________________________________

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit!

Sigs Owned - A Bunch
 
Posts: 4371 | Location: Nashville, Tennessee | Registered: December 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
paradox in a box
Picture of frayedends
posted Hide Post
She went with the Epson Pro, I think the 5150. She had not interest in laser. She's used the HP for at least 5 years, with no issues (surprising for a cheap HP) so she figured she'd give the Epson a try. The big ink tank was the main driver. Also size due to space constraints.




These go to eleven.
 
Posts: 12605 | Location: Westminster, MA | Registered: November 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Anush:
quote:
If you are printing a lot, a laser is much better than an inkjet.


This, I only use Brother with auto-feed in my CPA business. Ink Jets are a waste of money for business use. Also, NEVER use cheap toners as I have lost 2 laser printers using cheap toner. I print about 10,000 pages a year.


Depends on how much you print.

For my business, an inkjet was a better investment.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
In my opinion, laser produces a more professional product/print.

If your wife is a realtor, the incremental cost of a laser printer over an inkjet is worth not making a bad impression. Nothing says "I really don't get much business, that's why I can't justify the per-page economy of a laser printer" than being handed something printed with ink.
 
Posts: 13067 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
I really can't tell the difference when both are good quality printers.

Poor quality printers, yes there's a difference.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
I have an old Epson Workforce. It's lasted a long time. Okay except for color printing.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have an Epson Ecotank all-in-one and a 7-year old HP laser that will not die.

As others have noted, the Ecotank is the best inkjet option from an ink cost standpoint.

I agree with the suggestions above about going with a black and white laser for lengthy documents and an Ecotank for color pages, scanning and faxing.

A used HP laser is a viable option.
 
Posts: 704 | Registered: March 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Itchy was taken
Picture of scratchy
posted Hide Post
We use a Brother MFC-9340-CDW. It's a all in one color laserjet. Never had a problem with it. It's out of production, but I bet there is an updated version. Best part, not inkjet.


_________________
This space left intentionally blank.
 
Posts: 4132 | Location: Colorado | Registered: August 24, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Flash-LB:
I really can't tell the difference when both are good quality printers.

Poor quality printers, yes there's a difference.


But why risk making a bad impression? All it takes is for one prospect to walk away to really mess up the cost-benefit analysis.
 
Posts: 13067 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
W07VH5
Picture of mark123
posted Hide Post
If your wife is running a business is best to step up to something beyond consumer grade. I did this year and got a Konica Minolta Bizhub C3351. It makes all the other printers and AIOs look like toys. It’s seriously that much better.

I got really tired of the very expensive consumer grade devices giving up just as I was getting busier and didn’t have time to fart around with drivers or figure out why there are color stripes on everyone’s invoices.
 
Posts: 45674 | Location: Pennsyltucky | Registered: December 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What do we like for all in one printers?

© SIGforum 2024