SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Noticed an unusual aircraft around our city today-“Cobra 62.”
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Noticed an unusual aircraft around our city today-“Cobra 62.” Login/Join 
SIGforum Official
Eye Doc
Picture of bcereuss
posted


Can anyone tell me more about this plane other than what I’ve found here? Anyone fly one? Anyone crew one or maintain? Just curious-it stood out fin the usual aviation traffic here.

Noticed it took off from Nebraska, flew several circles around North Dakota. Then to Northern Minnesota where it flew a couple of circles around my city then back home to Omaha.

A quick internet search shows it’s a RC135. Here’s a blurb:

Brief blurb

Mission

The RC-135S Cobra Ball is a rapidly deployable aircraft, which flies Joint Chiefs of Staff-directed missions of national priority to collect optical and electronic data on ballistic targets. This data is critical to arms treaty compliance verification, and development of U.S. strategic defense and theater missile defense concepts.

Features

The RC-135S, equipped with a sophisticated array of optical and electronic sensors, recording media, and communications equipment, is a national asset uniquely suited to provide America's leaders and defense community with vital information that cannot be obtained by any other source.

Crew composition includes a minimum of two pilots, one navigator, three electronic warfare officers, two airborne systems engineers, and two or more airborne mission specialists.

Background

The current RC-135S aircraft trace their lineage to C-135 aircraft originally modified in 1961 and operated in 24-hour alert status out of Shemya AFB, Alaska. In 1994, all RC-135S aircraft and operations were transferred to the 55th Wing at Offutt AFB in Omaha, Nebraska. This action, along with many others, helped peacefully close another chapter in the history of the Cold War. Initially employed by Strategic Air Command to satisfy nationally tasked intelligence collection requirements, the RC-135S has also participated in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.

All Cobra Ball airframe and mission systems modifications are overseen by L-3 Communications, under the oversight of Air Force Materiel Command.

There are three RC-135S aircraft in the Air Force inventory all assigned to Air Combat Command and permanently based at Offutt Air Force Base, Neb. The Cobra Ball is operated by the 55th Wing, and manned with aircrews from the 45th Reconnaissance Squadron, and the 97th Intelligence Squadron, using various forward deployment locations worldwide.
 
Posts: 3143 | Location: (Occupied) Northern Minnesota | Registered: June 24, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I can't add anything you can't find on the www, but I'm pretty sure it was one of these (maybe not an S model) that the Russians thought was the target when they actually shot down KAL 007 (a passenger 747) in September 1983.

https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0113korean/
 
Posts: 16201 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
Hmmm. The KC-135 is a tanker based on the Boeing 707 airframe.

The pitot tube on the front of the vertical stabilizer in the posted picture says 707. I don’t recall seeing pitot tubes (or something that looks a lot like pitot tubes) on both wingtips on a 707. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a 707 from that angle, but I thought they were more svelte than that. From that view, the wings look shorter in length and deeper in chord than I expected. Oh well, I was never an expert on old airliners. The nose also looks strange, but that may be the housing for the cameras.

I’d say that aircraft started life as a Boeing 707. Not that that is any kind of news flash. Smile
 
Posts: 7468 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Dances With
Tornados
posted Hide Post
The 707 and the xxx-135 variants are similar in looks but fundamentally different airframes. They are not the same.
.
 
Posts: 12127 | Location: Near Hooker Oklahoma, closer to Slapout Oklahoma | Registered: October 26, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by OKCGene:
The 707 and the xxx-135 variants are similar in looks but fundamentally different airframes. They are not the same.
.


Correct. The -135 is a Boeing 717, derived from the 707 porotype.

Similar to the YF-17 evolving to becoming the F-18, a different airframe that appears similar, but ended up different.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 45145 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
Boeing's "717" internal designation number was later assigned to the MD-95 after Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas in 1997.

Link

IMO, the KC-135 seems more like the Boeing 720 than the 707.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 9593 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Certainly no aircraft expert here but the pod on the nose very much reminds me of a picture I recently saw on the internet, maybe here, of the mini sub hunting plane used for drug interdiction.



The “POLICE"
Their job Is To Save Your Ass,
Not Kiss It

The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says "go away" in any language - Clint Smith
 
Posts: 3030 | Location: See der Rabbits, Iowa | Registered: June 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Slayer of Agapanthus


posted Hide Post
Maybe giving the hairy eyeball to Somalians, Houthies, Yemanies, or similar types that have associates overseas.


"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye". The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupery, pilot and author, lost on mission, July 1944, Med Theatre.
 
Posts: 6081 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: September 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:
quote:
Originally posted by OKCGene:
The 707 and the xxx-135 variants are similar in looks but fundamentally different airframes. They are not the same.
.


Correct. The -135 is a Boeing 717, derived from the 707 porotype.

Similar to the YF-17 evolving to becoming the F-18, a different airframe that appears similar, but ended up different.
Thanks guys! I learn something new every day, often right here on SIGforum. Smile
 
Posts: 7468 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 229DAK:
Boeing's "717" internal designation number was later assigned to the MD-95 after Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas in 1997....


The military version began development as the 717 in the early 50s. This was consecutive to the 707 number, and that the aircraft was produced as the C-135, does not change it being a different aircraft.

Similar to the F-102 and the F-106, where the F-106 initially was to be the F-102B, and the F-102A was intended to only be used while the F-102B was produced as the desired airframe over the F-102A, but with continual modifications during the development of the F102B, and the schedule falling behind as funds were re-directed to the F-102A, the F-102B re-designated as F-106A.

The F-102A that was also developed into a two seat version during this time, normally would have become F-102B, but that number was "in use" for the F-102B (the later F-106A airframe), so the designations was TF-102A to denote "trainer".

All three aircraft were in work all in the same timeframe.

The assigning of 717 to the MD-95, does not change that the aircraft was a derivative of the the 707 prototype, and was intended to be the 717, but military numbering affected the change to the C-135.

The Prototype for both the 707 and the C-135 was the 367-80.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 45145 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Poacher
posted Hide Post
Don’t forget the RC-135 Rivet Joint.




NRA Life Member

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." Teddy Roosevelt
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: Newnan, GA USA | Registered: January 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIGforum Official
Eye Doc
Picture of bcereuss
posted Hide Post
Thanks. I’m also curious about why it would flying around here. The Dakotas I understand-missiles and all-but here at the tip of Lake Superior?
 
Posts: 3143 | Location: (Occupied) Northern Minnesota | Registered: June 24, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Character, above all else
Picture of Tailhook 84
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bcereuss:
Thanks. I’m also curious about why it would flying around here. The Dakotas I understand-missiles and all-but here at the tip of Lake Superior?

Might be something as simple as a training flight. Pilots need stick (yoke) time, and sensor operators need real-world experience using the equipment actually installed on the aircraft. Simulation and simulators are great, but nothing beats actually flying and operating the real asset.




"The Truth, when first uttered, is always considered heresy."
 
Posts: 2610 | Location: West of Fort Worth | Registered: March 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Probably on a trip
Picture of furlough
posted Hide Post
Yep, most likely just a training flight. Pilots shooting approaches, navigators doing their thing - they might not even have any sensor operators on board.

And the “pitot tubes” on the wingtips and vertical stab are HF antennas.




This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears above ground he is a protector.
Plato
 
Posts: 1788 | Location: Texas! | Registered: June 13, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Knows too little
about too much
Picture of rduckwor
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Poacher:
Don’t forget the RC-135 Rivet Joint.


Basically a flying nerve that can suck up and record any electronic signals it encounters. Flying out of Offutt AFB in Bellevue, NE. 55th Strategic Recon Wing.




TL Davis: “The Second Amendment is special, not because it protects guns, but because its violation signals a government with the intention to oppress its people…”
Remember: After the first one, the rest are free.
 
Posts: 20455 | Location: L.A. - Lower Alabama | Registered: April 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Dances With
Tornados
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 12127 | Location: Near Hooker Oklahoma, closer to Slapout Oklahoma | Registered: October 26, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Master of one hand
pistol shooting
Picture of Hamden106
posted Hide Post
quote:


Squirrel cheeks on a airplane?



SIGnature
NRA Benefactor CMP Pistol Distinguished
 
Posts: 6508 | Location: Oregon | Registered: September 01, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Cobra 62 heavy (61-2662) is doing touch and goes at the Moline (IL) airport (MLI) just across the river right now.

I have a scanner that picks up local ATC, and when I heard Cobra 62 talking to approach and tower (on VHF) I checked Open ADSB and there it was.

We're a mere 300 miles E of Offutt, planes from 55WG often practice at MLI.

https://www.airnav.com/airport/KMLI
 
Posts: 16201 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Noticed an unusual aircraft around our city today-“Cobra 62.”

© SIGforum 2025