SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question about TVs
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question about TVs Login/Join 
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted
I have an 18 year old Panasonic 1080p Plasma 50 inch screen TV in my house. It's not a Smart TV, but the picture still looks great to me.

Some people in my household, not to be named to protect the innocent, have told me I need to ditch it and replace it with a new thin panel TV.

I know that the new stuff beats this old technology, even though this old one still looks and runs as good as new (as I remember it fwiw), and the quality of the existing picture is still great. Yes it weighs a ton, but I like the picture.

I guess I'm old fashioned not wanting to pitch a piece of AV gear that still looks and works great. And what would I do with it ? I doubt anyone would want it, since even cheaper TVs today surely outperform it (aka, 4k pixel screens, etc.), prob even cheap ones.

IF I were to replace it, I'd wouldn't want to get a cheap one, though it would probably be fine, as long as it lasted and didn't give me any issues for several years. When it comes to technical things like tools and electronics, I don't like buying crap, more of a cry or maybe wince once type of purchase.

So what would you do ? IF I DID get a new one, how much should I spend to avoid buying any shit TVs in the 50 inch screen range, since it wouldn't make sense to me to buy a new TV that had a better picture (by definition being new technology), but was actually a pos compared to my old one or better units in the mid range of quality and performance ? I certainly don't need or want top of the line.

What do you think ?




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9967 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have a 20 year old 47" Sony Bravia. Works great. I get the same questions from my family a few times each year.

Why replace something that works great and has proven reliability?

If you do replace the tv, Sony and Samsung would be the brands I would look at first.
 
Posts: 5302 | Location: NH | Registered: April 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
As Extraordinary
as Everyone Else
Picture of smlsig
posted Hide Post
I just went through this with my old Samsung and ended up getting a Sony Bravia XR A95L. I also upsized to a 75” and all I can say is that the picture quality is amazing.

They also make several other models that aren’t quite as expensive like the Bravia 8 and Bravia 9’s.


------------------
Eddie

Our Founding Fathers were men who understood that the right thing is not necessarily the written thing. -kkina
 
Posts: 7256 | Location: In transit | Registered: February 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Partial dichotomy
posted Hide Post
There's a lot to be said about smart TV's.




SIGforum: For all your needs!
Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>
 
Posts: 41752 | Location: SC Lowcountry/Cape Cod | Registered: November 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
In the yahd, not too
fah from the cah
Picture of ryan81986
posted Hide Post
Are they giving you any reasons to upgrade the TV? Other than the fact that it's not the "hot new thing".

If they gave you any reason, such as the picture isn't as good as you think it is (I had this with my mother, her screen was literally tinted green), or it's not big enough, etc I'd say an upgrade never hurts. I own every flatscreen I've ever purchased. Every time I upgrade, another room gains a TV.

I very much prefer Samsung TVs with Sony in a close second. If you can afford OLED or equivalent I'd go with that. I still haven't reached that point yet.




 
Posts: 6731 | Location: Just outside of Boston | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The wicked flee when
no man pursueth
Picture of KevH
posted Hide Post
We just went through this.

We had 20 year old Samsung 50" plamsa that finally gave up the ghost.

We replaced it with a Vizio (garbage) 55" LED. The picture was not better and the software got laggy. I majorly missed the old Samsung plasma. I started using an Apple TV 4k which made the software side tolerable.

This past July we bought a 65" Sony Bravia 8 OLED. It took me about six months of careful shopping and staring at TV's before I pulled the trigger.

Why the hell did I wait so long?

The Bravia 8 OLED blows away the old plasma TV's and is light years ahead of the LED and and a lot of the QLED TV's in my opinion.

Since you are used to a plasma only go OLED. None of the LED's will look right to you (they can't do the deep black the plasma and OLED's can). Go at least 65" or 75" if you can fit it.

For the smart TV features, be cognizant of the software. I would pick a set that uses the same ecosystem as your phone. If you use an iPhone an Apple TV works great. If you are an Android user Google TV, which comes on the Sonys is pretty darn good. I don't care for Samsung's software, but I suppose if you used one of their phones it would probable work out.

My wife is fairly neurotic and spent a couple hours one day dialing in the Apple TV 4k to fit exactly our needs and have what we want and got rid of what we don't want. It's pretty slick.


Proverbs 28:1
 
Posts: 4388 | Location: Contra Costa County, CA | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green grass and
high tides
Picture of old rugged cross
posted Hide Post
Walmart has a 75" samsung for $448

I bought my mil a 58" Roku for $270 some dollars. It works great.



"Practice like you want to play in the game"
 
Posts: 21569 | Registered: September 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post
Wow, you have a plasma TV still going strong after 18 years? I'd be hard-pressed to get rid of it.

If it were me, I'd wait until it dies, or the picture quality degrades noticeably. Probably in just a couple years.



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"Pen & Sword as one."
 
Posts: 17958 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Lot of new tech in the flat screens and they are super lightweight, you can get a lot more screen and features.
 
Posts: 27663 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because something is legal to do doesn't mean it is the smart thing to do.
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wrightd:


Some people in my household, not to be named to protect the innocent, have told me I need to ditch it and replace it with a new thin panel TV.

What do you think ?


If this group of people does not include your wife then tell them to git their wallets out and buy the new tv set.

If does include your wife then I would suggest
you seriously consider getting a new tv.


Integrity is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking.
 
Posts: 4638 | Location: Metamora MI | Registered: October 31, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Savor the limelight
posted Hide Post
We replaced our 2012 65" 3D Panasonic plasma with a 85" Sony Bravia 9. Went bigger because we sit further from the TV in the new living room. As good as the Panisonic is/was, the new Sony is much better. The picture is brighter, the dynamic range is better, the colors are better, the resolution is better, the refresh rate is better, etc. As a side benefit, the Sony doesn't heat the room and uses way less electricity. You guys up north might like the extra heat though.

The picture is so good, college boy invited his buddies over for a movie marathon so they could marvel at how good the Sony Spider-Man movies looked. His buddies were amazed.

The Panasonic is downstairs now where it doesn't have to compete with as much ambient light.
 
Posts: 14378 | Location: SWFL | Registered: October 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mttaylor1066
posted Hide Post
My 55 inch LG C1 is now two generations behind, I recall I paid $1200 for it about 4 years ago. I think it still looks fabulous, faces are so lifelike, blacks are infinitely black, color saturation may be one half step behind the latest LG models… but not enough to make me invest in a new TV.

If you want the best experience I’d suggest the OLED screens from Samsung, LG or Sony. Each have their own predilections. E.g., most people believe the Sony does a better job with movies, the Samsung looks better with live sports and the LG somewhere between the two. Gaming… I haven’t a clue.

For a 55” screen you’re looking at $1200 to $1900 for the current generation of screens.

You can go down the deepest of rabbit holes comparing TVs these days. I like the rtings.com website but it looks like you need subscription to see the rating details. I am sure there are other comparison sites.


___________________

Company, villainous company hath been the spoil of me.
 
Posts: 1783 | Location: Stamford, CT | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 6guns:
There's a lot to be said about smart TV's.


Sure is. I'm really excited about ACR technology. Wink


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5546 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
quote:
And what would I do with it ? I doubt anyone would want it, since even cheaper TVs today surely outperform it (aka, 4k pixel screens, etc.), prob even cheap ones.
Use it as a second TV in the house or most county landfills/dumps will take electronics for recycling.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 10381 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
come and take it
posted Hide Post
I'm nostalgic about how much better the plasmas TVs were over anything else in their day. They fell out of favor because they were expensive to produce, but the picture always stomped the LED TVs. Yes the plasma is 2k vs 4k, but most of the time your only getting a 2k signal from your streaming or cable service, or over the air. Yes, I still get my local Hi-Def stations for free over the air from a big antenna that's been in the attic since the 1970s.

Over the years as people sold their Panasonic plasmas for bigger newer TVs I bought them for cheap, traded up from my square 36" tube tv to a 42" plasma, then traded up to 50", then traded up to 60" ($500 used 10 years ago). If you are used to a plasma picture, I'm not sure changing to an inexpensive LED 4k will really be a move up in picture quality. If you are used to a great picture I would go to an OLED.

On the smart TV aspect, my 14 year old dumb plasma TV with a Roku or Apple TV connected to any streaming service will do anything I need it to do. Only one time while connected to an Apple TV 4k have I gotten a message on the screen saying we cannot display this picture as your TV is not 4k.

Being a home theater enthusiast I bought a Sony Bravia 65" OLED a year ago. It's still sitting in the box, I haven't brought myself to take down the plasma. Listening to the former plasma admirers, KevH and trapper189 in this thread maybe I'll go ahead and get it out.




"The left can't applaud me because their hands are in other people's pockets." - Javier Milei
 
Posts: 2323 | Location: Texan on the north side of the Red River | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If it's in a dark room, you may want to keep it as long as you can. We had a Panasonic Plasma TV, maybe that same model, and it was perfect for a theater room. When it failed, I read how the plasma was famous for great blacks and picture quality. It was really hard to find something with similar picture and color quality.
 
Posts: 2428 | Registered: October 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The wicked flee when
no man pursueth
Picture of KevH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ibanda:
Being a home theater enthusiast I bought a Sony Bravia 65" OLED a year ago. It's still sitting in the box, I haven't brought myself to take down the plasma. Listening to the former plasma admirers, KevH and trapper189 in this thread maybe I'll go ahead and get it out.


Hook it up!

Run a good high quality HDMI and watch some 4k movies. You'll be shocked how good it looks.

I watch baseball religiously via MLB.tv through my Apple 4k which shouldn't be that noticeable. The difference is night and day. As good as my plasma was, the OLED puts it to shame. You'll be like me and wonder what took you so long.

For info, this is the one I bought: https://electronics.sony.com/t...ns/all-tvs/p/k65xr80

I hemmed and hawed over every single OLED model and after spending lots of time looking at them in person this is the one I picked (and have zero regrets). The panel acts as a speaker and the Dolby sound is actually quite good as well.


Proverbs 28:1
 
Posts: 4388 | Location: Contra Costa County, CA | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Ranger41
posted Hide Post
I have two older non-Smart TVs in bedrooms. I added an Amazon Fire Stick to them and now they have the same streaming options as my new TV.


"The world is too dangerous to live in-not because of the people who do evil, but because of the people who sit and let it happen." (Albert Einstein)
 
Posts: 1077 | Location: Rural Virginia - USA | Registered: May 14, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
I've got the same 50" plama TV, still chugging along. Not using it as main screen, it's in a bedroom.
Had the same in 65" that finally went POP after 14 years last year. Loved that TV, but the 77" Samsung OLED I replaced it with is a noticeable improvement.

I did have to give up the additional heating element it provided in winter, but offset that by not having to cool it in the summery. IYKYK.

And most every 50" TV is "shit" just in puny screen size. Unless you can't fit it or the space is too close, consider something bigger. Price will not be a hurdle.

I did a fair bit of research and kept landing back on Samsung, for either OLED or QLED. Have one of each, both are terrific.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 13532 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
When my parents downsized and moved 3 years ago, they gave me a 40" Sony flat screen TV, that I estimate to be at least around 15 years old. I put it in a spare bedroom. It's obviously not a Smart TV. But it weighs about 70 lbs and puts out some heat when operating. It's about 4 inches thick as well, so I don't know if it's a plasma or not. It is 1080p, and I have a Roku hooked up to it. Between the antenna and the Roku, it does everything I need.
 
Posts: 705 | Location: Middle Alabama | Registered: February 27, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Question about TVs

© SIGforum 2026