What’s True and False in One Health
In the 10 days before the inauguration of Donald Trump, the bureaucrats were busy little bees.
One of the documents completed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was the first-ever strong U.S. commitment to an agenda called “One Health” that has come to dominate thinking in global institutions since the COVID years.
It is the “first-ever National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States.”
Did Trump know this was brewing? There is reason for doubt.
Looked at intuitively, One Health seems unobjectionable, even an improvement over looking at health purely anthropomorphically and mechanistically. It embraces what can be called a holistic approach, one inclusive of all life forms, and who could object to that?
And yet, it is easy to get carried away with this theory. The Lancet two years ago laid out just how revolutionary this is. We are told to be “as concerned about the welfare of non-human animals and the environment as we are about humans. In its truest sense, One Health is a call for ecological, not merely health, equity.”
Here we have a problem. It is contrary to all human intuition to be equally concerned for the life of a rat as it is to be concerned about the life of your daughter, as David Bell pointed out. We simply cannot be “equally concerned” about bugs as we are about Mom. This way is simply madness and would cause complete chaos in societies everywhere.
What’s more, One Health, as being imagined by the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations, and all the other well-funded globalist bureaucracies now rallying around this slogan, is nothing but a mandate for intrusive disease monitoring, testing, and ultimately jabbing of the animal and human population. In other words, it is a cover for what amounts to a power grab in the name of holistic health.
What are we to make of the CDC’s new commitment to One Health? The document was issued on January 10, and one might suppose that it would be jettisoned by the incoming administration. Not so. The PDF report is clearly dated February 13, many weeks after Trump took power and even after the United States pulled out of the WHO.


https://www.theepochtimes.com/...ack&utm_medium=email

No doubt it’s BS, but I am pretty confident that healthier soils and water will produce more nutritious crops/improve human health.