Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
No. Pushing better gear / training to patrol is a supplement for improving response to emerging situations like an active shooter which are over too quickly for a SWAT response. It’s just a way to increase the agility and decrease effective response time. You do see SWAT on scene but they are normally clearing the rest of the structure after the fact. Individual augmentation is not a factor in the core functions of tactical teams such as barricaded subjects, hostage rescue or high risk warrant service. | |||
|
Member |
We are the smaller agency in our area so it was a little controversial to have started our SWAT team since the other agency already had one. I was going to try out when it was starting, but I REALLY REALLY didn't like who was starting it and commanding it...so no SWAT for me. Over the years, there was talk about disbanding it over budget issues, but we still have it today after over 25 years or so. I'm also surprised of how large our hostage negotiation team is. It does thin the ranks when both the SWAT and HNG teams do monthly training as well as other training the members attend, but the positives of having both outweigh not having them. Retired Texas Lawman | |||
|
Member |
At that level, some guys view such specialized units as their own personal fiefdoms.
Costs less than a full-time SWAT unit, and in this day of anti-LEO rhetoric, securing funding for negotiators is a lot easier. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |