SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Is anyone still into hobby photography?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Is anyone still into hobby photography? Login/Join 
Member
posted
I used to enjoy shooting with an SLR back in the 80s-90s, then moved into a DSLR. My primary interests were aviation and landscapes. Now that I'm retired, I wouldn't mind getting back into it. Is carrying around big cameras still a thing or have iPhones killed the hobby?
 
Posts: 9053 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
In the yahd, not too
fah from the cah
Picture of ryan81986
posted Hide Post
I haven't done as much as I would like recently but I still take my Canon 90D out on occasion. I would do airliners, landscapes and other things as well. Some of my stuff can be seen on www.ryanjphotos.com

Iphones have taken the place of normal point and shoot cameras. But as far as "professional" style photography, they still don't match up in my opinion.

I've been debating upgrading to the Canon R8 but I'm still going back and forth on it.




 
Posts: 6420 | Location: Just outside of Boston | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Looking at life
thru a windshield
Picture of fischtown7
posted Hide Post
Yes I even shoot and develop film too. Really get a lot of comments when I use my my Nikon F4.
 
Posts: 3876 | Location: FL, GA,HB, and all points beyond | Registered: February 10, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
As I was driving back from an out of town meeting a few days ago I thought more than once, “I should come back and take a picture of that.” Although I’m not interested in going back to film, I have serious cameras and a drawer full of different lenses that I enjoyed using at one time. Now I’m even thinking of getting a dedicated B&W only DSLR, although I admit to myself that I should first see if the hobby will grab me again.

If I did, it might wean me away from the more useless pursuits that occupy my time and often annoy me so much.




6.4/93.6
___________
“We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.”
— George H. W. Bush
 
Posts: 47817 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
I break my old DSLR [Nikon D70S] out from time to time, but don't typically carry it around.
I'll take it to a local car show, or something like the Houston Air Show, but otherwise a quick pic is just with my Samsung.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16173 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I usually just use my iPhone, to do anything spontaneous.

If I am planning to take pictures I grab the Digital Cannon.
 
Posts: 4793 | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Serenity now!
Picture of 4x5
posted Hide Post
I still enjoy shooting and developing black and white film. In fact, if I have time today, I'm planning on developing 2 rolls of 35mm, 1 roll of 120, and 4 sheets of 4x5 film.

A couple of times last year - once at the Grand Canyon, and once while hiking in the mountains near my home, people recognized my camera (a Nikon F3) and wanted to talk about photography and how much they missed film.



Ladies and gentlemen, take my advice - pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
ʘ ͜ʖ ʘ
 
Posts: 4950 | Location: Highland, UT | Registered: September 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
Back in college I used to shoot a lot with my old ME Super. When film got to be a logistical problem I got into a K100D, and eventually upgraded to a K5, which I still have. It usually comes along on vacation road trips for wildlife or landscape photography or to airshows, but apart from that doesn't get used much anymore. A lot of my trips I'm overnight backpacking or fishing these days, and I don't need the extra bulk and weight of the big camera so I just make do with my phone.
 
Posts: 9435 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Am The Walrus
posted Hide Post
The P&S camera is pretty much obsolete, IMO.

Seem to see less SLRs as mirrorless seems to be quite popular. Smaller size, less weight. I ditched my SLR for mirrorless but don't carry it around much. Not saying the iPhone has replaced the actual camera but I have my phone on me anyway.


_____________

 
Posts: 13344 | Registered: March 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
would not care
to elaborate
Picture of sse
posted Hide Post
Still one of my loves...

I have a question for the hobbyists. In the old days I would take nice pictures, sometimes at special events, color mostly, and I would have them enlarged for framing and I would give them to people as mementos, or similar, and the pictures would be sometimes framed, matted, etc...

For this purpose there used to be large, well-known, regional processing outfits, I think most of their business was wedding and other events, and commercial. When I worked in a professional photo lab as a teen, my two bosses did a lot of wedding photography. They used the company labs for putting together the proofs, but would still sent the final selections to a big outfit to construct the albums. The quality was always excellent.

I have been unable to find a processor that does this kind of thing any more. Now, if I have a nice picture I want enlarged I have to settle for some crappy drugstore processor. I tried Shutterfly a few times, just to produce a bunch of 3 x 5's. The color is always terrible, poorly cropped, just junk.

Does anyone know of a place that does quality printing with a result that does the digital files justice?
 
Posts: 3076 | Location: USA | Registered: June 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
^^^^

I'd agree. My iPhone takes photos as good as my P&S used to. No need to carry something extra.


A DSLR or mirrorless is definitely something to be used for a specific task. Going to an airshow, vacation out west, great sunset off the back deck, etc. Not EDC


My DSLR (D7200) is getting a bit dated and the lenses I have for it are nothing special. I think if I get back into it I'll look seriously at a Nikon Z series. They look like they are awfully nice. Of course, they aren't exactly giving those things away!
 
Posts: 9053 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
quote:
Back in college I used to shoot a lot with my old ME Super.


My daughter still has my ME Super I think. And she darn well better have the K1000 too!



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 12836 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
and this little pig said:
posted Hide Post
As you can see, lots of us still do hobby photography. I like to use a DSLR, when practical, but also have a P&S for when I'm loaded down with other gear.

I find the DSLR more creative with the selection of lenses, filters, and software available. I've been photographing since 1965 and have had darkrooms in my Dad's home as well as my own. Lightroom and Photoshop give you plenty of creative latitude!
 
Posts: 3406 | Registered: February 07, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Life's too short to
live by the rules
posted Hide Post
Smart phones have definitely killed the P&S market and is slowly killing the entry level DSLR and Mirrorless market. About 6 years ago I sold the last bit of my DSLR equipment (I’ve been into photography since the early 90’s) and went with smart phone only. As the years moved on, I started to miss using a real camera more and more. Last year I started back into photography with a Nikon DX Mirrorless. After a few really fun outings with that, I decided to jump in headfirst. I’ve rebuilt my collection with high end Nikon FX Mirrorless equipment and couldn’t be happier. Love being back into my life long hobby.
 
Posts: 1704 | Location: Richmond, VA | Registered: August 04, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Sadly, I've not done very much in photography since the virus that shall not be named landed here. That's one part of my life I want back; perhaps this Spring I'll dust off a film camera and a digi, and boldly go into DC for the cherry blossoms. Four years. Frown
 
Posts: 3456 | Location: Fairfax Co. VA | Registered: August 03, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sse:
I have been unable to find a processor that does this kind of thing any more. Now, if I have a nice picture I want enlarged I have to settle for some crappy drugstore processor. I tried Shutterfly a few times, just to produce a bunch of 3 x 5's. The color is always terrible, poorly cropped, just junk.


I've tried Shutterfly in the past and just like you I've never been happy with the results. I've even been in some of their print facilities and all they care about is the money. They have a closed loop process that gets good results if everything is done correctly but the average Joe doesn't understand or even want or need to figure out the correct process to sending in their photos.

I have used Nations Photo Lab for some of my pictures and have been very happy with the results from them. Even gave a couple prints away here as Karma's the last couple of years. I typically wait until they have a sale which brings the prices down dramatically. Sometimes up to 40%. I've also talked with people that have sent in photos right from their phones or digital cameras and have been happy with the results.

What I have found is that as you take photos if you do any type of post processing you can introduce color into that photo that can sometimes be out of the color gamut of the printer you send the files to. Might look awesome on the screen but then look all dark and muddy when you receive the prints back because their process cannot produce those colors.

Whenever I send photos to an outside source I check to see what their requirements are for color profiles or even how they should be saved. If the files you send are tagged using a color profile outside their process you will not like the results. I made this mistake myself when sending like 6 images to Nations. I forgot to change the color profile in the images, sent the files and received $60 worth of dark, crappy photos that I tossed in the garbage.

Most sites will have a section you can go into that will give tips and information in order to get the best results from your images.
 
Posts: 2504 | Location: Southern Minnesota | Registered: March 15, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
would not care
to elaborate
Picture of sse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WildSig:
quote:
Originally posted by sse:
I have been unable to find a processor that does this kind of thing any more. Now, if I have a nice picture I want enlarged I have to settle for some crappy drugstore processor. I tried Shutterfly a few times, just to produce a bunch of 3 x 5's. The color is always terrible, poorly cropped, just junk.


I've tried Shutterfly in the past and just like you I've never been happy with the results. I've even been in some of their print facilities and all they care about is the money. They have a closed loop process that gets good results if everything is done correctly but the average Joe doesn't understand or even want or need to figure out the correct process to sending in their photos.

I have used Nations Photo Lab for some of my pictures and have been very happy with the results from them. Even gave a couple prints away here as Karma's the last couple of years. I typically wait until they have a sale which brings the prices down dramatically. Sometimes up to 40%. I've also talked with people that have sent in photos right from their phones or digital cameras and have been happy with the results.

What I have found is that as you take photos if you do any type of post processing you can introduce color into that photo that can sometimes be out of the color gamut of the printer you send the files to. Might look awesome on the screen but then look all dark and muddy when you receive the prints back because their process cannot produce those colors.

Whenever I send photos to an outside source I check to see what their requirements are for color profiles or even how they should be saved. If the files you send are tagged using a color profile outside their process you will not like the results. I made this mistake myself when sending like 6 images to Nations. I forgot to change the color profile in the images, sent the files and received $60 worth of dark, crappy photos that I tossed in the garbage.

Most sites will have a section you can go into that will give tips and information in order to get the best results from your images.

Thank you for this input.
 
Posts: 3076 | Location: USA | Registered: June 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of holdem
posted Hide Post
I have a Nikon D500, 70-200 2.8 lens, a 2x teleconverter and some other lenses. I also have a iPhone Pro. The iPhone is the better option, with one exception, when I need long range.

When I go to an air show, the D500 comes along. The pic of the Blue Angels under my name was with a D500 and shot at 400mm 5.6. It is centered, but uploading it here croped it weird.

When I take pics of my daughter playing softball or in band or doing winter guard, the 70-200 rules.

When I take pics of tiny songbirds in my backyard, 400mm the whole way.

But if I do not need to reach out, it is always the iPhone.
 
Posts: 2377 | Location: Orlando | Registered: April 22, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Recondite Raider
Picture of lizardman_u
posted Hide Post
I still carry around a real camera... either a full frame digital Pentax DSLR or a medium format Pentax digital DSLR.

Currently my full frame DSLR has a huge lens mounted (Sigma 500mm 1:4.5) and a 2x Teleconverter which enabled me to catch this Downy Woodpecker the other day on my back porch...



__________________________
More blessed than I deserve.
http://davesphotography7055.zenfolio.com/f238091154
 
Posts: 3569 | Location: Boardman, Oregon | Registered: September 19, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Step by step walk the thousand mile road
Picture of Sig2340
posted Hide Post
I still use film in a Nikon F3 and a Sinar F 4x5. I also use a Nikon DLSR for things I need digital vice film.

I'd love to find a digital 4x5 back I could afford, but I don't think there is a source.





Nice is overrated

"It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government."
Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018
 
Posts: 32258 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Is anyone still into hobby photography?

© SIGforum 2024