SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Anyone using the X10 WiFI hub?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Anyone using the X10 WiFI hub? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted
I know we've talked about X10 and various smart devices here before, but I don't recall mention/use of the X10 WiFi hub.

I love the idea of smart gadgets, but I'm extremely hesitant to tie my house in with Google or Alexa. I don't need to connect to the system from outside the house; I'd simply like an easy-to-use automatable system.

If I'm reading things right, this X10 device doesn't require any internet connectivity. That's what I'm after.

Anybody here using this?




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
Not a lot of experience with X10 but with all the gadgets and control are largely cloud based.
The reason is they are easier to configure and control and with all of that of course less secure.
Controlling everything with Alexa Amazon in charge is very convenient but scares the shit out of me.
If you happen to stumble upon a premise controlled system then you would also have to be able to route any outside Internet traffic to the the control device.
That would require some router setup knowledge and at the minimum dynamic-DNS IP setup or static IP's.
If all you want to do is control from within your LAN with Wi-Fi or desktop then of course the Cloud or the IP forwarding is not necessary.
 
Posts: 23337 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
quote:
X10 WiFI hub


Says as long as you have internet access you can control with it, sounds like you would have the ability to use smart devices from anywhere.


https://www.x10.com/wm100.html

The X10 WiFi unit is here! Now, control all your same X10 units you have grown to love from your Apple or Android smart device anywhere you have internet access!
 
Posts: 24540 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
Well, fudge. I read that page twice, and I guess I overlooked that statement in my haste/excitement. Thank you, HRK.

[Feeling like a bonehead....]




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Connecting from the outside has advantages, Daughter left her phone and garage door opener in her house, lucky I had installed a MyQ since she was locked out. Opened her door from my office, bingo she's back in.. Shidt happens.
 
Posts: 24540 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by HRK:
Connecting from the outside has advantages


True. I keep considering the web-enabled thermostat, for times I'm on odd schedules and want to warm/cool the place a bit before I get home.




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
I live in the Appleverse, and am persuaded that they anonymize the shit out of data going back and forth to Apple.
I use Apple HomeKit switches from Leviton, Arlo cameras.
I will not, however, have a lock controlled through the internet. I'd rather keep a key under the front doormat as far as security is concerned.


_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
 
Posts: 18548 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sjtill:
I live in the Appleverse, and am persuaded that they anonymize the shit out of data going back and forth to Apple.
I use Apple HomeKit switches from Leviton, Arlo cameras.



Thank you, Dr. T. I looked up HomeKit and find it works with Wemo, which led to this:
https://www.belkin.com/us/p/P-WSP080/

That page mentions. "Simply plug the Smart Plug into an electrical outlet, plug a device into the Smart Plug, and control your device using the free Wemo app or by using your voice with Apple HomeKit, Amazon Alexa, or Google Assistant."

I see "or" in that statement, which leads me to believe the Smart Plug could work simply with the Wemo app, not necessarily requiring Alexa or Google intervention. Am I overthinking that?

I definitely don't want a web-enabled door lock. Good grief! Eek




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Security is a trade off.

You can avoid outside connections with an internal WiFi smart hub.

Look into Z-Wave smart hubs.

https://www.smarthomeperfected.com/z-wave-hub/

Internet connection is optional.

You can always plug in the hub for updates and disconnect it when you are done updating.

If you are worried about security with it and you have internet access at home.

Set up separate networks on separate routers with the smart home network not cross connected.

Use different numbering schema subnets for both routers.

It sounds more complicated that it is.

I have opted in to Amazon and Apple life.

I set reasonable passwords, if someone wants in bad enough I am not going able to stop them.

I make it complicated enough to have them go on to easier pickings.

It's like a wood house with windows and wood walls.

Break a window, smash out a door lock, cut a hole in the wall.

I have reasonable dead bolt locks and call it a day.
 
Posts: 4795 | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sig2392:
Look into Z-Wave smart hubs.

https://www.smarthomeperfected.com/z-wave-hub/


The Samsung Smart Things hub seems to get a good review. Samsung's own web site , however, doesn't seem to mention the hub. Lots of mention of the app; no mention of the hub. And Amazon (love 'em or hate 'em) doesn't appear to sell it.

Confused




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The One True IcePick
Picture of eyrich
posted Hide Post
Check out hubitat.
https://hubitat.com/

Almost everything runs local.




 
Posts: 873 | Location: IL | Registered: September 08, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eyrich:
Almost everything runs local.



Thank you. I'll check that out.




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vthoky:
quote:
Originally posted by sig2392:
Look into Z-Wave smart hubs.

https://www.smarthomeperfected.com/z-wave-hub/


The Samsung Smart Things hub seems to get a good review. Samsung's own web site , however, doesn't seem to mention the hub. Lots of mention of the app; no mention of the hub. And Amazon (love 'em or hate 'em) doesn't appear to sell it.

Confused
There's a lot of discussion online that Samsung is getting out of the Smart Things hardware market and may only offer software in the future. Personally, I won't use Alexa or Google Assistant, and just stick to WiFi hardware that doesn't require a hub of any kind. That still gives me access to my lights and other IOT stuff, but through the vendor's app on my phone.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Junior Member
posted Hide Post
Is anyone still using X10 Commander? I’ve been using it since 2010, everything has been great. I just got a new iphone and restored from a backup. X10 commander shows up on my new phone, but since it’s not in the app store anymore I can’t use it to control all my X10 stuff. Anyone have a way to fix? This is crazy that I can't use it (it still works on my old phone and I have a copy of the ipa still but not sure if that helps)

This is how the app worked with explanation http://www.usabilityinstitute....10commandersetup.gif
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: March 21, 2024Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Optimistic Cynic
Picture of architect
posted Hide Post
I used X10 for many years back when it was pretty much the only low-cost option available for home control. It was always too awkward to gain WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor). I suspect their WiFi hub allows control from any supported network-connected device (a platform for which they provide a controller app., per their website this looks like iOS and Android). Where on the network, as in all network-based technologies the controlled and controlling units are located is immaterial. That is, after all, the point of networking things together. You would control from where you would accept connections through standard firewall ACLs (Access Control Lists). Most premises routers support some ACL capability, most often, since most of them are Linux-based, the standard Linux firewalling stuff (I forget what it is called today, tomorrow it will be a different/"improved" name). You know iptables/ipchains/netfilter/etc.) There are, of course, other firewall implementations that could be called into service.

So the bottom line is that you don't have to use Alexa/Siri/whoever, or allow off-site access to your X10 or other home control infrastructure as long as you have a decent router/firewall in your network "between" the Internet proper, and your home LAN. AFAIK, X10 does not use, and cannot use your ethernet cables or WiFi to actually control their switches, etc. This goes over the power line. The WiFi hub acts as the gatekeeper between your control program and the X10 actuators. There is no "cloud" connection.

Frankly, I'm a little surprised one can still buy X10 stuff given that much better technologies have matured (Z-Wave, Zigbee, and RF433). It was never exactly graceful, and very limited in the control options provided, and how you hooked things together. It's not even the cheapest option anymore.
 
Posts: 6891 | Location: NoVA | Registered: July 22, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of vthoky
posted Hide Post
I used to use a lot of X10 modules. I know the Z-Wave, Zigbee, and RF433 stuff was "better," but it wasn't as simple. WAF, as you mentioned, could be enough of a challenge -- I didn't need to add the complexity of "learning the new stuff" to my burden.

I never tried the X10 Commander, Jackie, so I'm not really help to you on your question.




God bless America.
 
Posts: 14080 | Location: Frog Level Yacht Club | Registered: July 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
We used to have a bunch of X-10 stuff. (Actually, still have it, just no longer using it.) The problem with X-10 is it communicates with a rather primitive "aloha" protocol (an "aloha" protocol is one where data is sent with no return handshake to verify success/failure) over the house power wiring. As the house power wiring gets noisier from more and more electronics added to it, X-10 becomes increasingly unreliable.

I first solved the problem with a passive signal coupler installed between L1 and L2 in the distribution panel. When that stopped working I went with the first of two repeater/amplifiers. When that stopped working (noise from my new espresso machine, of all things) I finally gave up on X-10 and switched to Lutron Caséta.

Caséta has been in place for 2-3 years and has worked flawlessly.

Caséta does have the limitation that it has controllers only for resistive loads (dimmable incandescent/LED lighting), curtain/shade control, fan control, one non-resistive-load wall switch, and one (expensive, outdoor) non-resistive-load plug-in device. And their controllers are relatively expensive.

One advantage to Caséta is it has only one device, the automation controller, that need be on your network. All communications between Caséta devices are via their proprietary RF protocol. It needs Internet connectivity for setup/initialization, but thereafter will continue working without it. Obviously it needs Internet connectivity for off-premises control. I don't know if the app keeps working on your LAN without Internet. (Been meaning to try that.)

I've had no problem with WAF with Caséta.

I've had only one LED fixture, a cheap Lowe's product, not work correctly with Caséta.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26009 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The success of a solution usually depends upon your point of view
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eyrich:
Check out hubitat.
https://hubitat.com/

Almost everything runs local.



I went with Hubitat as well. I only connect it to the internet when I want to download a software update or if I am going to be out of town and want to be able to access it remotely. Everything is stored locally on the hub.

I looked at the X10 and decided to go with the Hubitat instead but I can’t remember the details of why.



“We truly live in a wondrous age of stupid.” - 83v45magna

"I think it's important that people understand free speech doesn't mean free from consequences societally or politically or culturally."
-Pranjit Kalita, founder and CIO of Birkoa Capital Management

 
Posts: 3928 | Location: Jacksonville, FL | Registered: September 10, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Anyone using the X10 WiFI hub?

© SIGforum 2024