SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Actions Against China- Your Ideas
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Actions Against China- Your Ideas Login/Join 
10mm is The
Boom of Doom
Picture of Fenris
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Broadside:
We need to get Europe to agree to a 30% tariff on all good manufactured in China. This tariff will be used to pay for the carnage that the Coronavirus has caused.

Maybe start at 30% to give supply chains a chance to adjust, but then automatically increase 10% a month. Plus have a quarantine on all products coming from China. Maybe 30 days to start and increasing by 30 days every 30 days.




God Bless and Protect the Once and Future President, Donald John Trump.
 
Posts: 17617 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 08, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by shovelhead:
I have a friend who deals in used tools. Storefront business. Chinese crap he blows out real cheap, on his shelves are Mac, Matco, Snap-On.

I try to buy American or at least western hemisphere and European items whenever possible.


Not to bust your bubble, but most of what's on the MAC truck is from China. Considerable in the Matco and Snap-On trucks are from China, and the Silver Eagle and Blue Point lines are mostly Chinese.

I have found Harbor Freight items on each of those trucks, too.

And let's face it, when Harbor Freight discussions have come up here and I've said friends don't let friends buy harbor freight, I've been a lone voice among many who rush to defend their love of harbor freight.

In those rally-round-the-flag moments, there's lots of "murika" being given lip service, but I'm betting that most here have a garage full of the crap.

It isn't going way any time soon.
 
Posts: 6650 | Registered: September 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sns3guppy:
And let's face it, when Harbor Freight discussions have come up here and I've said friends don't let friends buy harbor freight, I've been a lone voice among many who rush to defend their love of harbor freight.
Oh, that is pure fucking horse shit.

https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...250052854#9250052854

That's just one example. Others here have long said the same. You want to be special? Well, you'll have to find something else to be special about.
 
Posts: 110259 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fenris:
quote:
Originally posted by Broadside:
We need to get Europe to agree to a 30% tariff on all good manufactured in China. This tariff will be used to pay for the carnage that the Coronavirus has caused.

Maybe start at 30% to give supply chains a chance to adjust, but then automatically increase 10% a month. Plus have a quarantine on all products coming from China. Maybe 30 days to start and increasing by 30 days every 30 days.


Supply chains could not adjust that fast. But I agree with you that it needs to be ratcheted up over time. It also needs to be a coordinated effort across the free world.

I like the idea of quarantining goods as well. Companies would either need to quarantine good for 90 days or have all goods disinfected and packaged in the United States by United States workers.
 
Posts: 6739 | Location: Virginia | Registered: January 22, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Broadside:
A mandatory 30 day quarantine for anyone entering the U.S. who has been to China within six months of entering the U.S. This goes for U.S. citizens as well as foreign nationals. Plan to travel to China on business? Then plan your one month quarantine when you return.

The quarantine will not be quarantine at home. We will have a center set up in a single place. Anyone who has traveled to China will have to go through a single airport to the center for quarantine for one month.

We need to get Europe to agree to a 30% tariff on all good manufactured in China. This tariff will be used to pay for the carnage that the Coronavirus has caused.

Again, we need to get all of Europe to agree with this.

If this coronavirus has taught us anything, it is that you cannot expect an autocratic government to be able to work with a free market economy. The two are just not compatible. China needs to be walled off from the free world. The sooner people realize this the better.


I like the quarantine idea. You left out one component - there is $5,000 administrative charge to cover the costs of your quarantine.
 
Posts: 4979 | Location: NH | Registered: April 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Harbor Freight has USA made products, like all retailers they also have Chinese products.




Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx7S75ecOkc
 
Posts: 24725 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PowerSurge
posted Hide Post
^^^ Screw that place. Not worth the effort.


———————————————
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Northeast Georgia | Registered: November 18, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
Long, but there's a lot of stuff in the background. The bottom line is that if Trump winds up turning to Europe to put heat on the Communist Chinese, well, Europe may be a little more sympathetic than it has been over the whole 5G mess. After all, they're complaining about exactly the same things we are right now - China's either passing out or selling defective masks and testing kits, China's demands that other countries publicly kiss it's ass for what donations it's made, China's outright lies about the Kung Flu both in China and in other countries, China's predatory investing, and a lack of reliable and independent sources of medical materials.

quote:
China's Coronavirus Diplomacy Has Finally Pushed Europe Too Far
Alan Crawford, Peter Martin, Patrick Donahue, Bloomberg Law, 4/21/2020

With a series of high-level summits culminating in a visit to Germany in the fall by President Xi Jinping, this was supposed to be the year of Europe-China diplomacy. Instead, the Europeans are warning of a damaging rift.

Diplomats talk of mounting anger over China's behavior during the coronavirus pandemic including claims of price gouging by Chinese suppliers of medical equipment and a blindness to how its actions are perceived. The upshot is that Beijing's handling of the crisis has eroded trust just when it had a chance to demonstrate global leadership.

"Over these months China has lost Europe," said Reinhard Buetikofer, a German Green party lawmaker who chairs the European Parliament's delegation for relations with China. He cited concerns from China's "truth management" in the early stages of the virus to an "extremely aggressive" stance by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing and "hard line propaganda" that champions the superiority of Communist Party rule over democracy. Rather than any single act responsible for the breakdown, he said, "it's the pervasiveness of an attitude that does not purvey the will to create partnerships, but the will to tell people what to do."

While the Trump administration has resumed its swipes at China, European officials are traditionally less willing to be openly critical, in part for fear of retribution. The fact that politicians in Berlin, Paris, London and Brussels are expressing concern over Beijing's narrative on Covid-19 hints at a deeper resentment with wide-ranging consequences. Already some European Union members are pursuing policies to reduce their dependence on China and keep potential predatory investments in check, defensive measures that risk hurting China-EU trade worth almost $750 billion last year.

It's a turnaround from just a few weeks ago, when China emerged from the worst of its own outbreak to offer web seminars on best practices gained from tackling the virus where it first emerged. It also airlifted medical supplies including protective equipment, testing kits and ventilators to the worst-hit countries in Europe and elsewhere, in a show of aid-giving that contrasted with America's international absence.

The pandemic offered a chance for mutual solidarity. But it didn't last. "Now the atmosphere in Europe is rather toxic when it comes to China," said Joerg Wuttke, president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China.

Concerns were aired during a March 25 call of Group of Seven foreign ministers about how China would proceed during the crisis and once it subsided. Ministers were told that Europe and the G-7 must be on guard as Beijing was likely to move "more self confidently, more powerfully" and in a way that exploits its leverage when other nations were still in lockdown, according to a European official familiar with the call. In public, Chinese officials have struck a conciliatory tone. "When people's lives are at stake, nothing matters more than saving lives. It is useless to argue over the merits of different social systems or models," Foreign Ministry Spokesman Zhao Lijian said at a regular press conference on April 17. China, he said, is ready to work with the international community, including European countries, to "jointly safeguard the health and safety of all mankind."

Yet China's means of going about it has backfired in much of Europe. An anonymously authored text posted on the website of the Chinese embassy in France this month falsely accused French retirement home staff of leaving old people to die. It was "an incredible accusation on one of the most sensitive and tragic aspects" of the crisis in France, Mathieu Duchatel of the Insitut Montaigne wrote on Twitter.

The embassy website comments rang alarm bells for the needless offense caused. China underestimated the reaction to its conspiracy theories amplified propaganda outlets, according to two European officials in Beijing. What's more, China's insistence that aid be accompanied by public thanks and praise has undercut the goodwill it might have otherwise have gained, they said.

European governments have become more wary of China over the past two years as Xi's Belt and Road Initiative on trade and infrastructure expanded across the continent, snapping up strategic assets including ports, power utilities and robotics firms from the Mediterranean to the Baltic Sea. While some nations including Italy and Portugal have been enthusiastic backers of Belt and Road, another program known as Made In China 2025, whereby Beijing seeks to become the world leader in key technologies, is seen in many quarters as a further threat to European industry.

With stock prices tumbling on the coronavirus crisis, countries including Germany that have investment screening regulations have tightened them and extended their scope in response to concerns that China, among others, could take controlling stakes in companies suddenly made vulnerable. EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager suggested in a Financial Times interview that governments go further and buy stakes in companies themselves to stave off the threat of Chinese takeovers.

More far-reaching still are proposals to curb dependence on China, not just for medical supplies but in areas such as battery technology for electric vehicles. EU Trade Commissioner Phil Hogan said last week there's a need for a discussion "on what it means to be strategically autonomous," including building "resilient supply chains, based on diversification, acknowledging the simple fact that we will not be able to manufacture everything locally." Japan already earmarked $2.2 billion from its $1 trillion stimulus package to help its manufacturers shift away production from China.

Without mentioning China, EU trade ministers agreed in an April 16 call on the importance of diversifying to "reduce the reliance on individual countries of supply." As a first step, Berlin plans state funds and purchase guarantees to start industrial production of millions of surgical and face masks by late summer. China currently exports 25% of the world's face masks.

Wuttke of the EU trade chambers said the discussion on supply chains began when Beijing shut its ports earlier this year, prompting fears that pharmaceutical ingredients produced in China would not reach Europe, and causing policymakers to realize the strategic products had to be secure. According to another European official, even official suppliers were breaking contracts for items such as ventilators and scamming people, burning bridges along the way. "people want to have their eggs in more baskets," said Wuttke.

Certainly the tenor of the political debate in Europe has shifted since. German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas has told Bild newspaper that China's revising up of the death toll last week was "alarming," while French President Emmanuel Macron said in an FT interview there were "clearly things that have happened that we don't know about." U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said it can't be "buisness as usual" with China once the pandemic is over.

Spain's Health Ministry has canceled an order of antigen test kits from Chinese company Bioeasy after sending back a previous batch, the country's "El Pais reported. Health authorities found that both sets of kits were faulty, it said.

As a result of the Covid-19 crisis, pressure is growing on the U.K. to reverse its decision to allow Huawei Technologies a limited role in its fifth-generation mobile networks, while France may be less inclined to grant Huawei a chunk of its 5G contracts after the embassy spat. Germany must make a decision by around midyear on Chinese involvement in its 5G networks.

In the battle of narratives, Germany is key, according to Janka Oertl, director of the Asia program at the European Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin. As well as Europe's dominant economy, its trade ties with China dwarf those of its neighbors: German exports to China in 2019 were higher than the U.K., France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands combined. It will assume the EU's rotating presidency on July 1, giving it a chance to turn the debate in Europe.

China could still win back favor and help secure a greater global role by acceding to demands to open up its markets and introduce a more level playing field for international buisness, said Oertel. "That would be something that the Europeans would very much appreciate," she said. All the same, she added: "I don't think it's very likely."

Original text at http://news.bloomberlaw.com/co...ushed-europe-too-far
 
Posts: 27318 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
7.62mm Crusader
posted Hide Post
We should send up a smoke signal to Germany to buy more of their products. China is out of control. The world knows it. Put them back in check, with your money, to be a good neighbor on the globe or continue on their path of rejection. Yes they should be held accountable for the run away health problems they caused. Held financially and made to pay.
 
Posts: 18044 | Location: The Bluegrass State! | Registered: December 23, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
It's not you,
it's me.
Picture of RAMIUS
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by David Lee:
We should send up a smoke signal to Germany to buy more of their products. China is out of control. The world knows it. Put them back in check, with your money, to be a good neighbor on the globe or continue on their path of rejection. Yes they should be held accountable for the run away health problems they caused. Held financially and made to pay.


The world should vote to rename China. I like Douche-Town and China McChina Face.
 
Posts: 7016 | Location: Right outside Philly | Registered: September 08, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by David Lee:
We should send up a smoke signal to Germany to buy more of their products.

Since we actually send some products east across the Atlantic anyway, shipping ought to be cheaper.
 
Posts: 27318 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
The world should vote to rename China. I like Douche-Town and China McChina Face.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dude you are watching too much Southpark. Seriously it would be funny to see CNN using those terms.
 
Posts: 17719 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As long as so many of our politicians are in the pay of China ... Mad
 
Posts: 2561 | Location: KY | Registered: October 20, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
the Bongino report has an article on the start of the business exodus from China

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-from-china-n2567594

As the world begins to heal from the COVID-19 outbreak, news broke Wednesday that a U.S.-based rare-earth materials mining company, MP Materials, was granted a U.S. Department of Defense contract to begin the process of bringing the mining of these elements back to the U.S. and away from China, which had been producing roughly 80% of the world’s supply. These elements are crucial in the development of technological products, notably in high-tech security and defense systems, and the move to bring the supply chain home is a hallmark of a great exodus of business and manufacturing out of mainland China, and not just by the U.S.

A new report by global manufacturing consulting firm Kearney indicates U.S. companies had already began leaving China during the trade war between the two nations that began in 2019, and that chances are good even more will leave due to the pandemic that originated in Wuhan.

The Kearney report notes a “dramatic reversal” in a trend over the last five years as U.S. manufacturing began to grow relative to manufacturing exports from Asian countries, with imports from China hit particularly hard.

"Three decades ago, U.S. producers began manufacturing and sourcing in China for one reason: costs,” said Patrick Van den Bossche, a Kearney partner who helped write the 19-page report. “The trade war brought a second dimension more fully into the equation?risk?as tariffs and the threat of disrupted China imports prompted companies to weigh surety of supply more fully alongside costs. COVID-19 brings a third dimension more fully into the mix­, and arguably to the fore: resilience?the ability to foresee and adapt to unforeseen systemic shocks.”

But the U.S. is not alone in reconsidering China as a hub for business. Earlier this month, Japan was reportedly intent on using state funds to help fund $2 billion needed to get their multinational corporations out of China.

According to Bloomberg, Japan felt the pain of having supply chains located in China during the pandemic, a criticism the Trump administration also voiced as the U.S. lacks in medical supplies like masks and personal protective equipment for health care providers.

“China is Japan’s biggest trading partner, but imports from China slumped by almost half in February because many factories were closed. Those closures meant Japanese manufacturers had no place to go for supply,” Bloomberg reported.

Additionally, some of the largest tech producers of phones and computers began signaling in March they were interested in exploring development of supply chains outside of China in nations such as nearby Vietnam and India.

Covid-19 is hastening such moves. Eric Tseng, chief executive officer of Taipei-based Isaiah Research, said some companies had been holding back from making any major supply-chain decisions, waiting to see if there would be any lasting resolution to the Washington-Beijing trade spat. “But coronavirus risks people’s lives. Now A lot of companies will accelerate their departure,” he said.

For its part, the U.S. – with the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement freshly in hand – may be looking to its immediate neighbors to the north and south when scouting potential new sourcing locations.

The Heritage Foundation produced a report this week encouraging exactly that.

Strengthening our partnerships with Mexico and Canada will allow us all to rely less on China in the global supply chain. Lessening vulnerabilities to U.S. supply chains is a key pillar of our economic reconstruction. China cannot be trusted to control important industries. Binational manufacturers in North America are uniquely suited to fix this problem. Companies were already moving production out of China and into Mexico before the pandemic. The United States and Mexico need to accelerate this trend.

The Federal Communications Commission has also recently begun asking questions of Chinese-owned telecom companies “demanding explanation of why the FCC should not initiate proceedings to revoke their authorizations” because of potential threats they pose to national security.

China, once a nation built explicitly for business, has tested the world’s patience in their careless approach to containing the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, they are about to find themselves begging for customers.


Sarah Lee is a freelance writer and policy wonk living and working in Washington, DC.
 
Posts: 54102 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
Thanks to fracking, and the nearly limitless supply of natgas it creates, nuclear reactors, which are vastly more expensive to build than combined cycle gas turbine power plants, are economically non-viable. And now, as solar gets cheaper, even natgas is losing economic viability.

quote:
Originally posted by kimber1911:
We need to change our attitude towards Energy.

The one big thing President Trump has accomplished which is often over looked is bringing energy independence to the U.S. in regards to fossil fuel.

Remember Gas prices in 2008, when were solely at the mercy of the Middle East?

Now we are shutting down our nuclear plants at a far greater rate then building.

Look at what China is doing: Power Reactors Under Construction.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
^^ You say that, but given the amount of methane that's simply leaking off the Permian Basin, we've still got cheaper-than-hell petrochemical options for energy that we haven't even tapped. Solar's big price edge is that we use petroleum products - including natgas - as a component in a number of products we manufacture, whereas solar energy is just energy.

The beauty of all this, as far as schadenfreude goes, is that the ChiComs will fuck nuclear power up too. They've already repeated some of the silliest mistakes we made back in the 1930s in the course of damming rivers to produce electricity; if they're going big on nukes then a Chinese Chernobyl is almost a mathematical certainty.
 
Posts: 27318 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
^^^

a Chinese Chernobyl you say? Big Grin

more 'power' to them Big Grin
 
Posts: 54102 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
california
tumbles into the sea
posted Hide Post
EDC

Camillus 72 Carpenter’s Whittler
flowfold wallet
Malkoff MDC HA 1AA
Smith & Wesson J-frame
Mika pocket holster
Tuff Writer pen
Fisher Space pen refill

Backpack

Tom Bihn Synapse 19

ED shave

Blackland Blackbird SB
Timeless Ti .95MM SB
 
Posts: 10665 | Location: NV | Registered: July 04, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
The beauty of all this, as far as schadenfreude goes, is that the ChiComs will fuck nuclear power up too. They've already repeated some of the silliest mistakes we made back in the 1930s in the course of damming rivers to produce electricity; if they're going big on nukes then a Chinese Chernobyl is almost a mathematical certainty.

Pretty much an absolute certainty they will fuck-up and because their entire decision making chain is centralized around its political system, it'll be bad and resemble the bumbling the Soviets did.

The easiest middle-finger to China, would be to recognize Taiwan as an independent nation. The CCP would loose it's collective mind and it would politically unseat all their efforts over the last 70-years.

- Restore full diplomatic relations with Taiwan including Embassies and other diplomatic missions
- Leverage the UN to restore Taiwan's seat as a member, which was removed in 1971, insist that Taiwan have seats on all UN subcommittee, to include the WHO
- Resume visits by USN ships to Taiwan, along with visits by S.Korea, Japan and Australian navies.
- Encourage financial commerce and trafficking with Taiwanese institutions
- Increase defense purchasing with Taiwan to build-up their defensive capability.
 
Posts: 15255 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Steyn
posted Hide Post
From recognizing Taiwan to not buying Chinese, all are good ideas. China must pay the price for this.
 
Posts: 393 | Registered: October 12, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Actions Against China- Your Ideas

© SIGforum 2024