Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
An investment in knowledge pays the best interest |
Not moot at all and it relates to record keeping + future strategy. If 23andMe were stupid enough to share genomic data unblinded with a third party, then became a covered entity, they wouldn't have the opportunity to up-sell the GHR data to that individual, now would they? The report is based on their genome, which won't change, so they could attempt to further monetize the data. Some horses you can't get back in the barn though. Which is why the reporter should have at least asked, yes even years ahead of time what their plans are (and I qualified whether or not an answer would have been provided, but the article doesn't say that the author attempted to generate a response from 23andMe) b/c HIPAA policy goes back further than 4 years. Glad you agree with me that consumers should carefully read privacy policies. | |||
|
Waiting for Hachiko |
I am considering using the DNA testing offered by National Geographic, anyone here have any experience with that company (Helix)? 美しい犬 | |||
|
Experienced Slacker |
Thanks for the info folks. Right now it is $199 for the full 23 and me package, which is more than I care to spend. Especially if it is indeed as inaccurate as Dakor noted earlier. Sounds like waiting for some changes is the best idea for now. | |||
|
Member |
"Hello, Sir. According to 23 and me, you are my Father and I would like to meet your Wife and any Brothers and Sisters I may have." I think I'll pass. "Politics is to Philosophy as Engineering is to Science." | |||
|
Stangosaurus Rex |
I'm pretty fair skinned. After the sun burn heals, I get 1 percent freckles! ___________________________ "I Get It Now" Beth Greene | |||
|
Member |
I don't understand how they can make these claims of ancestry. The service is based on the idea that American is a land of immigrants and we are all different ethnically. If you tested 100 random people on the street one person would be part English and French, another person might be part German and Russian, and somebody else might be part African and Mexican, etc. But isn't that based on the false notion that all other countries are ethnically pure and America is unique in its multiculturalism. In fact, if you tested people in France or Argentina you would find just as great a variation in their ancestry so how can they state what French DNA is? | |||
|
Biochemical Superfreak |
You are partially correct. They aren't stating what French DNA is, but they are playing a stats game. They have identified SNPs/loci/alleles that have been correlated to a geographical reference with high probability (but not 100% for sure). If you contain that marker, it simply means that it "most likely" originated from a population where that marker frequently occurs, not that the marker does not occur in other populations at random. It's all based on probability and likelihood ratios and given an accumulation of markers it provides some discrimination power. However, it is not absolute with the exception of total exclusion - i.e., these 2 samples do not match or this person did not contribute any material to another. The paternity/maternity/relationship analysis is solid, but inference of origin is a bit of a stretch with any certainty. As Dakor stated, this is for entertainment purposes. 115 + 115 = 230 | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |