SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Moral question: Turning your child into the police.
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Moral question: Turning your child into the police. Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
You answered your own question, God, family, country. Do you really think God wants you to harbor your murderer son against the law? I think not.
 
Posts: 7541 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Still finding my way
Picture of Ryanp225
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by airsoft guy:


Malum prohibitum, and malum in se, the first is wrong because we say it is, the second is wrong because it's obviously wrong, "evil in itself".

My question is always who is the victim, and how are they the victim? Theft, assault, murder, things of that nature have pretty clear victims, and how, usually. Less clear are things like the prohibited magazines, who's the victim? Oh, some grabber wine mommy has an aching chest pussy? That's not quite damage enough for me to give a shit.

People decry the lack of respect for laws, point to it as some moral failing. If the laws made sense, if they weren't just attempts to control political enemies, harass usually peaceable individuals, I'd be right there with you. But there's so many laws, so many that are just a "fuck you, do as I say", so many written and championed and passed by people who never grew out of that angry kindergartener who hated seeing the other kids playing "wrong", who carried that well into adulthood and now gleefully exercise political violence against anybody who doesn't step in line.

I've so far avoided murder, and assault, and theft, and all the other big ones, but I will routinely ignore prohibitions with no victims, doubly so if there's no chance of being caught. That's not me boasting or trying to sound like a badass, I've only got so many days on the planet, I can't spend them worrying about stupid bullshit dreamed up by dumb bitches in suits that cost more than my car.


You said it better than I could have.
As I said earlier, no matter the crime I would never be such a sniveling simp to the state as to rat on my own blood. They come before ALL others in this world. This is not to say that I'd agree or condone their actions. Just that I don't accept that the state has any authority to hand out punishments or make judgements against any of us. That is for the ones who were wronged.
 
Posts: 10851 | Registered: January 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
One thing I have noticed recently is that the proliferation of "malum prohibitum" laws that airsoft guy described do nothing to promote respect for the law. Failure to enforce the others doesn't help either. Sigh...
 
Posts: 7304 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
I am of the mind that is it is "minor" transgressions which can be fully and properly satisfied between parties, (the shoplifting, vandalism etc.) their is no need to bring "the law" into it.

The "law" should be for such times as the matter not being able to be satisfied between parties.

Often the "damage" from the "cure" is worse than handling it between the child and the party, and the parent/adult being the "righteous mediator".

None of this is "skirting" the law.


And "a man's gotta know his limitations" applies. If it is beyond one's ability to make right the wrong and make whole the injured party, then taking it to the "authorities" is the correct thing to do.

Bottom line. Protecting my own blood, over someone who has been unjustly transgressed, is wrong on premise. (but there are certainly exceptions, and there is no "one size fits all" position)




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44880 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Nope.

The more I have seen of the American Judicial system, the less I am inclined to go anywhere near it.

Thirty years ago, I would have had a different answer.
 
Posts: 4813 | Registered: February 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Smarter than the
average bear
posted Hide Post
[QUOTE]Originally posted by airsoft guy:


… Oh, some grabber wine mommy has an aching chest pussy? That's not quite damage enough for me to give a shit. …

QUOTE]

Is this a series of typos or a result of autocorrect, or am I just that far out of current culture?

What the hell is a “grabber wine mommy” or a “aching chest pussy”?
 
Posts: 3583 | Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana | Registered: June 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
As Extraordinary
as Everyone Else
Picture of smlsig
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by honestlou:
quote:
Originally posted by xd45man:
...
I don't think I would turn in my 5 year old for stealing a pack of gum...



Yes, I would, and you should, turn in your 5 year old for stealing a pack of gum. It would be much better to learn lessons early, and you have a duty as a parent to facilitate that learning.

For an older child it's still clearly the right thing to do. For society and for the offender.

The only exception that I've thought of is if they did something technically illegal, but morally right under the circumstances. No hard examples, but y'all get the idea.


This is my feelings as well.

Self confession time to prove my point.
My Dad died when I was 12 and my teen years were rough. My Mom was struggling to raise 4 kids and did a fantastic job but my teenage years were touch and go. As an example when I was 15 I wanted to go to a party in Derry NH where my favorite local band was playing ( you may have heard of them…Aerosmith). Anyway, my Mom said no and we had a huge blowout. I ended up “borrowing” the family station wagon. Long story short. I was not found driving, thank God, but my Mom dragged me down to the Chief of Police’s office where he read me the riot act and actually scarred the shit out of me. I never pulled that shit again.

So yes, kids need to be reported and maybe they will actually learn how close they came to really getting into trouble…


------------------
Eddie

Our Founding Fathers were men who understood that the right thing is not necessarily the written thing. -kkina
 
Posts: 6592 | Location: In transit | Registered: February 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Happiness is
Vectored Thrust
Picture of mojojojo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ryanp225:
Just that I don't accept that the state has any authority to hand out punishments or make judgements against any of us. That is for the ones who were wronged.


I hope you're never seated on a jury for a murder trial. You'd never vote guilty if this is your take on things.

Hey, are you one of those Sovereign Citizens???



Icarus flew too close to the sun, but at least he flew.
 
Posts: 6798 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: April 30, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
When one of the Jr DFs stole a toy from the grocery store at age 6, I made him take it back and confess and hand it to the store manager. Except for occasionally raiding my ammo cans, he has never stolen since. When Jr DF #1 developed a vandalism habit, I took him to the house he vandalized (old vehicles on the property) and he confessed to the old man who lived there. We couldn’t repair the damage so my son and I cut and split a winter’s worth of fire wood and stacked it. That took the two of us all day. DF#1 and the old man became friends and he would sometimes go over there and do yard work the old guy couldn’t do. When correcting my boys, I didn’t always involve law enforcement. Most times they were accountable privately. But they were always accountable. This is not to say they are perfect. But they know mom and dad expect accountability.



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 30162 | Location: Norris Lake, TN | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think it comes down to the severity of the crime and whether someone's safety is at risk.


___________________________________________________

in the 'Merica Navy they teach you to go pew pew pew...
Luckily in the PNW they taught me to go BANG BANG BANG
 
Posts: 115 | Registered: November 02, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
quote:
I ended up “borrowing” the family station wagon. Long story short. I was not found driving, thank God, but my Mom dragged me down to the Chief of Police’s office where he read me the riot act and actually scarred the shit out of me. I never pulled that shit again.


That was great your mom did that, I can see Sheriff Andy giving you a stern talking too, maybe showing you the jail, locking you in for a few minutes, then sending you home with mom LOL...

That was a different era when you could interact with a local law enforcement that wasn't bound by the new rules requiring them to report things like that regarding children.

Today's world your mom could be charged with neglect, Child Services contacted, you're mom and the house checked while they determined that your mom was fit to raise kids.

It's possible the repercussions of having the government in their homes has reduced the interaction of parents today with state and local law enforcement over problems with kids.

quote:
Originally posted by darthfuster:
When correcting my boys, I didn’t always involve law enforcement. Most times they were accountable privately. But they were always accountable. This is not to say they are perfect. But they know mom and dad expect accountability.


This was my parents method, dealing with them, the disappointment from a parent, having to face the person you wronged and make it right.
 
Posts: 24881 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by HRK:


That was a different era when you could interact with a local law enforcement that wasn't bound by the new rules requiring them to report things like that regarding children.


So, I must have been sick the day these “new rules” were rolled out. Could you explain me what the “new rules” are? Because there’s noting in the juvenile code, nor the KARs that exist. And from having been with the feds for the last 5 years, the is no such thing in the USC.

(I think we both know that no such rules exist in free states)

Matter of fact, I wish it existed. I would love to lock up every parent that sees a cop in a public place and tells their child that the cop will come get them if they don’t eat their broccoli or whatever. Or the parents who call for service on an “out of control” six year old. Or the parents that call the police because their child won’t get out of bed to go to school.

Hell, there’s no shortage of really shitty parents. Good news is that the legislator is likely passing a law allowing to try 15-17 year old violent criminals as adults. Maybe there’s hope yet.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37376 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by HRK:
quote:
I ended up “borrowing” the family station wagon. Long story short. I was not found driving, thank God, but my Mom dragged me down to the Chief of Police’s office where he read me the riot act and actually scarred the shit out of me. I never pulled that shit again.


That was great your mom did that, I can see Sheriff Andy giving you a stern talking too, maybe showing you the jail, locking you in for a few minutes, then sending you home with mom LOL...

That was a different era when you could interact with a local law enforcement that wasn't bound by the new rules requiring them to report things like that regarding children.

Today's world your mom could be charged with neglect, Child Services contacted, you're mom and the house checked while they determined that your mom was fit to raise kids.

It's possible the repercussions of having the government in their homes has reduced the interaction of parents today with state and local law enforcement over problems with kids.


I've never heard of those "rules" either. In the scenario as described, we have maybe a learner permit violation (infraction) or operator never licensed (misdemeanor) not actually witnessed by an officer, and unauthorized control of a motor vehicle without a victim, as mom is declining to pursue charges for the crime against her property.

As a cop if I had a parent drag their kid into our office requesting that I explain the consequences of such behavior, I'd do exactly that and nothing more. I've done similar on numerous occasions.

quote:
I don't accept that the state has any authority to hand out punishments or make judgements against any of us. That is for the ones who were wronged.


So do you reject the rest of the Constitution, too, or just the parts you don't like? What you're suggesting is vigilantism. Our justice system does indeed have a lot of problems related to how it's being interpreted and applied, but that's not a solution with a desirable outcome.
 
Posts: 9745 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
In Odin we trust
Picture of akcopnfbks
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AKSuperDually:
Very little chance I'd call LE on my child.


I know long, nested quotes are frowned upon, so I cut this waaaay down, but AKSD's answer nails my thoughts on this matter perfectly. Well said.


_________________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than omnipotent moral busybodies" ~ C.S. Lewis

 
Posts: 1816 | Location: The Northernmost Broadcast Point of Radio Free America | Registered: February 24, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I am wondering if the word moral means one thing if a person is all alone without others to judge
And
Something different while in the company of others that may very well pass judgement.


Which could skew the whole right vs wrong aspect





Safety, Situational Awareness and proficiency.



Neck Ties, Hats and ammo brass, Never ,ever touch'em w/o asking first
 
Posts: 55417 | Location: Henry County , Il | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Moral question: Turning your child into the police.

© SIGforum 2024