SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    New Ford Expedition / V6 ecoboost feedback
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
New Ford Expedition / V6 ecoboost feedback Login/Join 
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by old rugged cross:
And I am on record saying the F150 isn't much of a real truck.

None of these are horrible rigs for what they are. I am just not a fan for my use.

If you are in flat, interstate county and do not need a regular hauler or tower any of these rigs will do fine. But the offering's of 1/2 ton pickup's and suv's these days are just fancy grocery/kid haulers. Not serious HD rigs like days gone by.

In pickups you still have the option of a 3/4 or one ton. In an Suv about the only thing left is the Sequoia that is a HD rig, imho


The Sequoia be it a great rig but is only capable of towing 7200 pounds.

The Expedition is capable of 2000 more pounds and has the 10 Speed transmission. Plus if you get the Max (extended length) you are gaining stability with the extra length.

Not really sure what you are basing things off of.


————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 25756 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of barndg00
posted Hide Post
2017 Expedition Limited EL 4x4 owner here. The 3.5L Ecoboost is much more capable than the 5.0L Coyote, due to the very wide torque band the turbos provide. I've got 55k miles on mine, change the oil every 5k with full synthetic. Had a bearing in the front diff start making noise around 24k miles, replaced under warranty. No other issues. The new generation has an updated engine, to solve carbon deposit issues on the valves as I understand it, and the new 10 speed transmission. Can't say I've towed anything heavy, only an occasional ~4,000# utility trailer. The factory brake controller system worked great for that, no problems with power either.
My dad and I have made trips from NC to SD for the past 2 years for pheasant hunting with our gear and dog in it, and it was extremely comfortable. Compared to his 2015 Silverado with the 5.3L V8, the Expedition is much more powerful, rarely needing to downshift. I've been very happy with mine, and plan to keep it a very long time.
 
Posts: 2163 | Location: NC | Registered: January 01, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green grass and
high tides
Picture of old rugged cross
posted Hide Post
Hook 7000 lbs to a sequoia and Expedition and head up a mountain pass in NW part of the country and see what happens. I would take the Sequoia all day long. Hook 9000lbs to an expedition and try it. That is laughable.



"Practice like you want to play in the game"
 
Posts: 19866 | Registered: September 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
Confused Threaddrift

Isn't the Sequoia pretty much an SUV-ified Tundra?

Laughing a bit at the F150 not being a 'real' truck. Not everyone needs an HD with a Duramax/PowerStroke/Cummins for their daily driver.
Pretty sure the majority of 1/2 tons trucks today are far more capable (and comfortable) than the 1/2 ton trucks from 10-20 years ago.
I can't imagine my dad's 98 GMC Sierra (350cid, IIRC) being able to do half of what my F150 with its baby 2.7l V6 could do.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 16175 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Giftedly Outspoken
Picture of sigarms229
posted Hide Post
quote:
Pretty sure the majority of 1/2 tons trucks today are far more capable (and comfortable) than the 1/2 ton trucks from 10-20 years ago.


I'll up you on that. My neighbors 2015 F-150 will out tow my 2002 F-250. My max is 12K with the 5.4gas while his ecoboost will tow 12.9K.

Yeah, I'm laughing too that an F-150 isn't a "real" truck.



Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six
 
Posts: 4603 | Location: SouthCentral PA | Registered: December 05, 1999Reply With QuoteReport This Post
As Extraordinary
as Everyone Else
Picture of smlsig
posted Hide Post
Just came back from a 15K mile trip to Alaska and back and noticed a lot of the Expedition Max’s towing campers etc. seemed like it had plenty of power and looked stable.


------------------
Eddie

Our Founding Fathers were men who understood that the right thing is not necessarily the written thing. -kkina
 
Posts: 6486 | Location: In transit | Registered: February 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Rev. A. J. Forsyth
posted Hide Post
quote:
And I am on record saying the F150 isn't much of a real truck.

None of these are horrible rigs for what they are. I am just not a fan for my use.

If you are in flat, interstate county and do not need a regular hauler or tower any of these rigs will do fine. But the offering's of 1/2 ton pickup's and suv's these days are just fancy grocery/kid haulers. Not serious HD rigs like days gone by.

In pickups you still have the option of a 3/4 or one ton. In an Suv about the only thing left is the Sequoia that is a HD rig, imho


Have you ever towed anything with one?

The Sequoia? It's a cheapened up Land Cruiser for the American market. I'll agree that current rigs are bloated and too expensive, but their capability for towing has been much enhanced over previous models.

I currently own a 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 with the Cummins IBT. An engine that needs no introduction. The truck will pull anything, but it's loud, hunts for gears, wanders, jars the teeth out of your head, and basically struggles in the mountains. The truck is immaculate and well maintained. Not some worn out beater. I have also leased a new F150 since 2006. I will say hands down, without any hesitation that an F150 with the 3.5 Ecoboost and the tow package is the greatest tow vehicle I have ever used. The 3.5 makes something around 470 ft/lbs of torque at 2500 rpm.

I have towed vehicles through the mountains on interstate 77 with both, I have towed camper trailers from Phoenix to Flagstaff with both. I would take the F150 every day all day over that Dodge. In fact, the last time I was hauling a Toyota Rav 4 from Savannah to Pittsburgh on a car hauler I was doing 80mph up a grade on I77 while turning 2200 RPM. I don't care who you are, that's fantastic.
 
Posts: 1639 | Location: Winston-Salem  | Registered: April 01, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green grass and
high tides
Picture of old rugged cross
posted Hide Post
Yea ajf, I have. my brother has one. nice rig, for what it is. I will take my Tundra 5.7 with six speed tranny all day long over his eco for towing. Hands down.



"Practice like you want to play in the game"
 
Posts: 19866 | Registered: September 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Good enough is neither
good, nor enough
posted Hide Post
I am on my 2nd F150 with a 3.5 ecoboost. I have not had any issues and will seek it out in the future. A buddy of mine has a 6.2 liter v8 Denali and it has to get the rpms way up pulling anything on hills, while my ecoboost barely downshifts pulling the same boat. Twin turbos torque is hard to match for a gas engine.



There are 3 kinds of people, those that understand numbers and those that don't.
 
Posts: 2041 | Location: Liberty, MO | Registered: November 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Towing Capacity Pickups USA

2020 Ram 3500 Heavy Duty | up to 35,100 pounds
2020 GMC Sierra/Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD | up to 35,500 pounds
2020 Ford F-450 Super Duty | up to 37,000 pounds
2020 Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra 2500HD | up to 18,500
2020 Ford F-250 Super Duty | up to 20,000 pounds
2020 Ram 1500 | up to 12,750 pounds
2020 Ford F-150 | up to 13,200 pounds
2020 Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra 1500 | up to 12,100 pounds
2020 Toyota Tundra - 8,800 and 10,200 pounds

Toyota Official Specs Page
 
Posts: 24503 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
We have a 2018 Max Platinum. It is fantastic. The engine is awesome! Have not done any towing.

I’d be happy to answer any questions.


Cathy
 
Posts: 302 | Registered: August 10, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Jack of All Trades,
Master of Nothing
Picture of 2000Z-71
posted Hide Post
I've got the 3.5 Ecoboost in my 2019 F-150 and love it. My only complaint is you can have Eco or Boost, not both. Drive like grandma and it will get decent mileage, have fun with it and the mileage takes a big hit. Cruising at 65mph and lower 20+mpg, cruising at 75mph or higher, less than 17mpg.

The 10 speed transmission is great with its multiple drive modes; Sport encouraged juvenile behavior, Snow/Wet does make a big difference in winter driving.

In 2013 I sought out a 5.0 thinking simpler motor less things to go wrong. I did do an intake and exhaust on it and I really do miss the sounds that truck made. When I traded it in, I made the mistake of test driving a 3.5 Ecoboost, the low end torque is addicting. Much more responsive than the 5.0. The 5.0 really has to rev high to make power, the Ecoboost doesn't.




My daughter can deflate your daughter's soccer ball.
 
Posts: 11920 | Location: Eagle River, AK | Registered: September 12, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
It's pronounced just
the way it's spelled
posted Hide Post
I've got a 2014 F-150 SuperCrew with the Ecoboost. No engine problems, accelerates like an old school V8 and I still get 18+ mpg, even with the way I drive it. I test drove all the pickups at the time, wasn't impressed with most of them, the Toyota seemed like it lacked low end, but that was 7 model years ago.
 
Posts: 1535 | Location: Arid Zone A | Registered: February 14, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of KPSquared
posted Hide Post
I have a 2018 F-150 Raptor, twin turbo 3.5, 10 speed. I haven’t had any issues with it yet, but only 12k miles on it. It gets about 25 mpg for interstate travel when doing the speed limit...and is so very fast when you want it.


Thanks,
KPSquared
 
Posts: 811 | Location: Ft. Knox, KY | Registered: February 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Towing uphill in high elevations is going to starve a naturally aspirated engine long before it would on anything turbo charged. So saying the eco boost is going to be outperformed in that situation by a NA engine with similar HP & torque ratings is simply wrong.
 
Posts: 728 | Location: Milwaukee, WI | Registered: July 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I can’t imagine why one would think the sequoia is heavier duty than an expedition. It’s nice it has a v8 but the tow rating is way less. And everything else about is way less except that it has certainly has the normal Toyota edge in reliability. I’m in full agreement these are light duty vehicles and that’s why I drive HD trucks. But when I shopped for these for my wife the best of the bunch is the expedition.


“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
 
Posts: 11219 | Registered: October 14, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ACTEG
posted Hide Post
Thanks again for the feedback guys. I've got a 2017 Tundra crewmax 4x4 for the primary towing duty. The boat and trailer ready to go fishing weigh in around 7000 lbs and all my towing is in Florida. I know the sequoia is the same motor and drivetrain but it doesn't have leaf springs in the rear like the tundra does and can't handle as much weight / squats more than the Tundra. The 5.7L is thirsty, but is also bulletproof.

The wife just really like the expedition max for the looks and roominess. I just want to make sure it's reliable and will decently hold it's value. I paid $37k for my Tundra in 2017 and can get $34-35k in trade (50k miles and 3.5 years later). I tried to convince my wife to drive a Tundra crewmax for the mommy mobile but she isn't warming up to that idea.
 
Posts: 3592 | Registered: March 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My current truck is a 2012 F150 and will be hitting 180K miles by the end of then month. My wife has a 2017 Expedition that will probably hit 100K miles in the next month or two. They both have the 3.5 ecoboost and have been reliable. I think the base curb weight of her expedition is actually higher than my truck but both move around pretty easily with the 3.5. I usually average 15-17mpg and she gets 19-20 mpg on average.
 
Posts: 185 | Registered: July 21, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
eh-TEE-oh-clez
Picture of Aeteocles
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rev. A. J. Forsyth:

The Sequoia? It's a cheapened up Land Cruiser for the American market.


Not just no, but fuck no.

Never. Ever. Compare a Sequoia to a Land Cruiser.

A Land Cruiser is Toyota's flagship vehicle. It is engineered from the ground up on its own chassis, designed for an ultra-long lifecycle and durability above all else. It is not a Sequoia. It is not a 4 runner.

A Sequoia is gussied up Tundra. A 4 Runner a gussied up Tacoma. Those are American market trucks, built to US standards and needs. As nice as those vehicles are, they are not Land Cruisers nor derived from one.

(The Land Cruiser Prado, which exists in other parts of the world, shares the same platform as a 4runner and Lexus GX470. The Land Cruiser Prado is only related to the Land Cruiser in name.)
 
Posts: 13066 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: May 19, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have a 2018 Expedition limited 2wd, that I took delivery of new in June 2018. I'm very happy with it. The ecoboost has plenty of power and 10 speed auto is seemless. I get 17 mpg heavy city traffic and 21-22 mpg on the highway at 80 mph. I really like it and it's my 5th new Expedition. Sadly I only have 17k miles on it, it's my daily driver, but I'm out of town a lot. I have had to have all of the shocks replaced under warranty recently as they were leaking, other than that it has been trouble free. It's much better than my previous 2008.....I like the aluminum body......and interior......The fold flat second and third row seats are great if going to Home Depot.

If I were to go smaller it would be the new Explorer without a doubt.
 
Posts: 21421 | Registered: June 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    New Ford Expedition / V6 ecoboost feedback

© SIGforum 2024