Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Step by step walk the thousand mile road![]() |
I'm guessing there are folks who loaded this app onto their phones, and then traveled outside the US without deleting it. That would be an ITAR violation.
Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | ||
|
Raptorman![]() |
I have that app on my phone for my ATN Thermal telescope. ____________________________ Eeewwww, don't touch it! Here, poke at it with this stick. | |||
|
Thank you Very little ![]() |
but but, its for your safety...... | |||
|
Freethinker |
Where does the article say that traveling outside the US with the app is an ITAR violation? ![]() All I see is that it’s part of an investigation into illegal export of the scopes (hardware) themselves. And couldn’t the app be downloaded from anywhere? ► 6.4/93.6 “It is peace for our time.” — Neville the Appeaser | |||
|
Step by step walk the thousand mile road![]() |
No you don't. You never had a phone. This is not the phone you are looking for. Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | |||
|
Step by step walk the thousand mile road![]() |
The article doesn't say traveling outside the US with the app on your phone is an ITAR violation; however, the consensus in the ITAR world today is that if you take any export controlled item, including software, digital documents or drawings, or even a laptop with those sort of digital items on it, and you do not have an DDTC export license, BINGO!, ITAR violation. It is why most big firms give their personnel when they travel outside the US a special stripped down laptop with no user documents on it, and no ability to access export controlled materials using it. Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | |||
|
Freethinker |
Okay, thanks. I can understand an abundance or even an excess of caution in many situations, but from what little research I have done I was under the impression that a violation required transferring a restricted item to a non-US person, not merely taking it out of the country. I have seen ITAR warnings in connection with several different scopesights, but not others. Is there someplace I can go to gain a better understanding of the rules? Added: This is what Wikipedia says about it. “For practical purposes, ITAR regulations dictate that information and material pertaining to defense and military related technologies (items listed on the U.S. Munitions List) may only be shared with U.S. Persons unless authorization from the Department of State is received or a special exemption is used. U.S. Persons (including organizations; see legal personality) can face heavy fines if they have, without authorization or the use of an exemption, provided foreign persons with access to ITAR-protected defense articles, services or technical data.” Other references say essentially the same thing, that the rules govern providing restricted items to “foreign persons,” not merely transporting them across the border to a foreign country. ► 6.4/93.6 “It is peace for our time.” — Neville the Appeaser | |||
|
Member |
Slippery slope? Nah, I’m assured that I can keep my deer rifle and scope. It’s not about that, and this type of data would never be used for any other purpose...... I wonder how Jake Williams and Lawyer Ekeland comes down on 2A issues? | |||
|
Step by step walk the thousand mile road![]() |
My understanding is DDTC has a hard line position that providing access is sufficient. They need not prove the foreign party obtained the materials. Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | |||
|
Freethinker |
Okay, thanks again. ► 6.4/93.6 “It is peace for our time.” — Neville the Appeaser | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|