Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
At Jacob's Well |
It's an interesting story that I was reading about on Chessbase earlier today. However, the quoted line above is a bit of a dramatization. I played through the game, and at no point was Max "winning". The white player always has a small plus in the computer analysis to start a game simply because they get to play first. Max just hadn't made a mistake until move 9, but neither had Magnus. The entire game was a massacre, as you would expect. Max had as much chance of winning as I would in a foot race against Usain Bolt. Still a good story, it just got my inner chess nerd worked up a bit. J Rak Chazak Amats | |||
|
Imagination and focus become reality |
Exactly! Prior to the first move, in ChessBase 13, using Stockfish, and Komodo as the engines, it shows 1. e4 at 0.22 and d4 as 0.18 meaning White is slightly better without making any moves. After 1. e4 e5 White is at 0.49 with Deep Fritz 13 and 0.31 with Houdini 6.02x64. Basically these numbers are meaningless on the first few moves of a game. | |||
|
Baroque Bloke |
How about this one: From July, 2015. ‘Nigel Richards’ command of the language of Molière, as the French like to call it, stretches to “bonjour” and being able to count. However, the New Zealander who has been called “the Tiger Woods of Scrabble” certainly has a way with words – even French ones. Despite his linguistic handicap, Richards has just won the francophone world Scrabble championships after reportedly memorising the entire French Scrabble dictionary in just nine weeks. “He doesn’t speak French at all – he just learned the words,” his close friend Liz Fagerlund told the New Zealand Herald. “He won’t know what they mean, wouldn’t be able to carry out a conversation in French, I wouldn’t think.” …’ https://amp.theguardian.com/li...-doesnt-speak-french Serious about crackers | |||
|
The Ice Cream Man |
So, that would be really interesting to study. I'm guessing that he's internalized some kind of algorithm/vector which says "legitimate word" vs "gibberish word"... | |||
|
Member |
Wow ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Q | |||
|
Freethinker |
The fact that anyone would believe, much less say that is a profound illustration of how the brains of different individuals can differ because it strikes me as one of the most bizarre things I’ve ever read. There are countless examples of how exceptional people have mental capabilities that are simply unimaginable for the vast majority of us. If we put our minds to it, could each of us write a Mozart-level classical symphony, much less in a month or so? Could we become fluent in Japanese by simply watching Japanese television programs for two (yes, count ’em: two) weeks? Could we memorize the contents of an entire book by looking at each page for seconds and then recite everything flawlessly a year later just because we wanted to? Can we believe for an instant that the people who can and have done such things have brains that are no different than those of the other 99.99999… percent of humanity? If we have the desire should we strive to develop and make the best possible use of all the capacities we actually have? Sure, but the nonsensical platitude that “You can do anything you want to” does no one any good, and especially not a simple-minded person who may become convinced it’s true and then after time and effort learns that no, it’s not possible for everyone to do whatever they want to do. “I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.” — The Wizard of Oz This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do. | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |