SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    New Zealand stores ban knives after mass stabbing
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
New Zealand stores ban knives after mass stabbing Login/Join 
Political Cynic
Picture of nhtagmember
posted Hide Post
spoons are next
 
Posts: 54563 | Location: Tucson Arizona | Registered: January 16, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 229DAK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhtagmember:
spoons are next
Don't forget the eeeevil sporks, too.


_________________________________________________________________________
“A man’s treatment of a dog is no indication of the man’s nature, but his treatment of a cat is. It is the crucial test. None but the humane treat a cat well.”
-- Mark Twain, 1902
 
Posts: 9770 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: November 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
.. it's just that every time any criminal activity likes this crops up, the fall guy is always the UK.

We should be thankful for the UK.
Without it's tyranny we wouldn't exist.

Now, now, please to not be yanking tac's chain Smile

I am always thankful to the UK, or, more correctly, England, for it was Her history, Magna Carta, and 1689 English Bill of Rights that set the stage for our own Constitution, Bill of Rights, and RKBA.

At one time England not only allowed, but encouraged, even required Her subjects to be armed. In this, She was regarded by the monarchies on the continent as having lost Her ever lovin' mind.

I've mentioned this book, here, several times before: To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right, by Joyce Lee Malcolm.

quote:

Malcolm's story begins in turbulent seventeenth-century England. She shows why English subjects, led by the governing classes, decided that such a dangerous public freedom as bearing arms was necessary. Entangled in the narrative are shifting notions of the connections between individual ownership of weapons and limited government, private weapons and social status, the citizen army and the professional army, and obedience and resistance, as well as ideas about civilian control of the sword and self-defense. The results add to our knowledge of English life, politics, and constitutional development, and present a historical analysis of a controversial Anglo-American legacy, a legacy that resonates loudly in America today.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26139 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
.. it's just that every time any criminal activity likes this crops up, the fall guy is always the UK.

We should be thankful for the UK.
Without it's tyranny we wouldn't exist.

Now, now, please to not be yanking tac's chain Smile

I am always thankful to the UK, or, more correctly, England, for it was Her history, Magna Carta, and 1689 English Bill of Rights that set the stage for our own Constitution, Bill of Rights, and RKBA.

At one time England not only allowed, but encouraged, even required Her subjects to be armed. In this, She was regarded by the monarchies on the continent as having lost Her ever lovin' mind.

I've mentioned this book, here, several times before: To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right, by Joyce Lee Malcolm.

quote:

Malcolm's story begins in turbulent seventeenth-century England. She shows why English subjects, led by the governing classes, decided that such a dangerous public freedom as bearing arms was necessary. Entangled in the narrative are shifting notions of the connections between individual ownership of weapons and limited government, private weapons and social status, the citizen army and the professional army, and obedience and resistance, as well as ideas about civilian control of the sword and self-defense. The results add to our knowledge of English life, politics, and constitutional development, and present a historical analysis of a controversial Anglo-American legacy, a legacy that resonates loudly in America today.


I've just looked for this book here in UK and to my horror it's over $70!!!

It'll have to wait until we are over in the Spring.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by smschulz:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:

Same pattern as the U.K.: Ban the guns, then ban the knives. Next up: Being found in possession of anything that might be used as a defensive tool will get you arrested.



I believe the UK will even arrest you for defending yourself.


Totally incorrect, Sir or Madame, please look up self defenCe in UK.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
From Mr ensigmatic -
quote:
And absolutely no possibility of carrying at all--unless, of course, you're a law enforcement officer or active military in the performance of your duties, correct?


An ever-increasing number of police are armed here on Mainland UK. In Northern Ireland they have been routinely armed since April of 1922.

MoD police guarding certain installations are armed, as are those running guard on the occasional nuclear convoy. Certain military bases also have armed guards - not civilians, though.

And of course, soldiers, sailors and airmen and Royal Marines performing guard protection of the Sovereign are armed, just like your President, in fact, although here in UK the Secret Service does other things - that's why the Queen, as head of the UK's Armed Forces, has soldiers protecting her and not the men in dark suits.

Over in Northern Ireland, as I've pointed out dozens of times already, there are around 3500 government-issued handguns out there for PP.

Anyone watching the Changing of the Guard in Windsor will have noticed the armed police front and rear of the troops as they march, as well as major centres of transport - major train stations and airports and so on.

So tell me, don't YOUR military on active duty carry firearms? Don't bother to answer - of course they do.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:

So tell me, don't YOUR military on active duty carry firearms? Don't bother to answer - of course they do.


Actually, the vast majority of them don't except for when they go to the range or are doing certain types of training or are in Indian Country.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
Intruders in your home in UK?

This is the law right now -

Using reasonable force against intruders.
You can use reasonable force to protect yourself or others if a crime is taking place inside your home.

This means you can:

protect yourself ‘in the heat of the moment’ - this includes using an object as a weapon
stop an intruder running off - for example by tackling them to the ground.
There’s no specific definition of ‘reasonable force’ - it depends on the circumstances. If you only did what you honestly thought was necessary at the time, this would provide strong evidence that you acted within the law. Read guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service.

You do not have to wait to be attacked before defending yourself in your home.

However, you could be prosecuted if, for example, you:

carry on attacking the intruder even if you’re no longer in danger.

pre-plan a trap for someone - rather than involve the police.

Recent cases this century have resulted in the deaths of intruders using their own weapons, and serious injury using objects found in the home. In one case a bunch of gypsies attacked a farm house and got themselves shot to shit by a husband and wife team of fine clay shooters - they all survived to get long prison sentences that they are are still serving.

In every case the home-owners walked.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
Over in Northern Ireland, as I've pointed out dozens of times already, there are around 3500 government-issued handguns out there for PP.

"PP": "Personal Protection?" What means that?

quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
So tell me, don't YOUR military on active duty carry firearms? Don't bother to answer - of course they do.

Maybe something got lost in the translation between American "English" and the Queen's English Smile

What I was pointing out was that everyday, average, Jane or Joe Citizen cannot carry a firearm for self defense. That only agents of the government are so-blessed.

tac, I'm not nicking the U.K. for Her laws. Well, ok, I am, but they are what the majority of the citizens want, I guess, so, in that respect, I'm not.

Note that I'm equally critical of U.S. states that have similar restrictions. So I'm not picking on y'all.

The larger point, as noted in my prior post, is it wasn't always that way in the U.K., or, at least, England.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26139 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
Apparently no one in New Zealand has any legitimate use for a pair of scissors or a knife. Is all meat sold in stores going to come pre-cut to your specifications? How handy!

I'll guess at some point they'll roll back to allowing them, as long as they have blunt points. That way everyone will be reduced to the same level as a 5 year old. Can't have unsafe pointy things.

Clearly Gibbs will never travel to New Zealand.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 38706 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
Their PM would hate my high cap ghost assault knives with the black thing that goes up.



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 30454 | Location: Norris Lake, TN | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:

To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right, by Joyce Lee Malcolm.

I've just looked for this book here in UK and to my horror it's over $70!!!

It'll have to wait until we are over in the Spring.
There are a couple of copies listed on Ebay, located in the UK, for less than $40.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/12476...3:g:iXQAAOSw6W5gwx2D



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 32471 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fire begets Fire
Picture of SIGnified
posted Hide Post
Concrete saw still ok?







"Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty."
~Robert A. Heinlein
 
Posts: 26758 | Location: dughouse | Registered: February 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Glad I don't live in New Zealand. I have to wonder how restaurants will prepare food without knives. Then there are the Produce section in every grocery store, without knives all that produce is petty near useless. I mean, what to do with an onion, mash it into paste with a rock. That would make for a pretty lousy look in a salad. I guess you could eat a steak by beeating on it until it was mush but suspect the taste would NOT be the same. So in one fell swoop New Zealand is basically banning any food prep tools with an edge which means they be going Stone Age in a very real sense.

BTW, a Chef's Knife kept sharp enough to shave with can make for a very handy defensive weapon if your firearm is out of reach.


I've stopped counting.
 
Posts: 5824 | Location: Michigan | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
"PP": "Personal Protection?" What means that?

Means just that - personal protection as in CCW.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by tacfoley:
So tell me, don't YOUR military on active duty carry firearms? Don't bother to answer - of course they do.

Maybe something got lost in the translation between American "English" and the Queen's English Smile

What I was pointing out was that everyday, average, Jane or Joe Citizen cannot carry a firearm for self defense. That only agents of the government are so-blessed.

Yup that is correct. here in UK except for the 3500 or so in Northern Ireland, the average Joe or Joette can not carry a firearm for PP.


tac, I'm not nicking the U.K. for Her laws. Well, ok, I am, but they are what the majority of the citizens want, I guess, so, in that respect, I'm not.

The citizen has NO say in the law-making in UK.

Note that I'm equally critical of U.S. states that have similar restrictions. So I'm not picking on y'all.

Understood and thank you.

The larger point, as noted in my prior post, is it wasn't always that way in the U.K., or, at least, England.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scooter123:
I have to wonder how restaurants will prepare food without knives.
There is not a nationwide ban on knives. The attack happened in a store, so, naturally, stores are removing knives from their shelves.
 
Posts: 112135 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nullus Anxietas
Picture of ensigmatic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
What I was pointing out was that everyday, average, Jane or Joe Citizen cannot carry a firearm for self defense. That only agents of the government are so-blessed.

Yup that is correct. here in UK except for the 3500 or so in Northern Ireland, the average Joe or Joette can not carry a firearm for PP.

Curious about that. Why are the gun laws so much less Draconian in N. Ireland? Given the history, one would think it would be just the opposite.

Re: Those PP licenses: Is it "may issue" or "shall issue" there? I.e.: Do you have to show a need, or does the government have to demonstrate why not?

quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
tac, I'm not nicking the U.K. for Her laws. Well, ok, I am, but they are what the majority of the citizens want, I guess, so, in that respect, I'm not.

The citizen has NO say in the law-making in UK.

Then I'm more confused than I thought I was.

There are two houses of Parliament: The House of Commons (aka: "lower house") and the House of Lords (aka: "upper house"). It's my understanding bills must be passed by both houses to become law. While the upper house appears to be more-or-less a good ol' boys club, the lower house appears to be roughly equivalent to our House of Representatives in that members are elected by popular vote.



"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe
"If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
 
Posts: 26139 | Location: S.E. Michigan | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Uppity Helot
posted Hide Post
I suspect the NI gun laws are marginally less draconian so agents of Empire can protect themselves. I also suspect that the majority of the PP pistols and permits are issued to RUC officers, Corrections officers and others that serve the Queen in NI, in such a way that the IRA or someone of similar bent would love to kill them given the opportunity.
 
Posts: 3219 | Location: Manheim, PA | Registered: September 04, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by divil:
I suspect the NI gun laws are marginally less draconian so agents of Empire can protect themselves. I also suspect that the majority of the PP pistols and permits are issued to RUC officers, Corrections officers and others that serve the Queen in NI, in such a way that the IRA or someone of similar bent would love to kill them given the opportunity.


Exactly. Except that here they are called public servants.

The RUC ceased to exist in 1999. It was replaced by the Police Service Northern Ireland.

They do NOT serve the Queen.

They serve the community of the people of Northern Ireland.

The firearms laws relating ONLY to handguns are different from the rest of the UK because - strange as might seem - ALL the killings over the almost thirty years of violence in which handguns featured were committed using ILLEGALLY-acquired handguns - sometimes stolen from dead police officers, or from members of the Army who had been publicly beaten to death and shot by the PIRA.

Corporal Howes' pistol that can be seen with him brandishing it out of the car window was subsequently used to kill at least three other people.

The Government relented on the handgun ban in the case of Northern Ireland, but for nowhere else. Otherwise the laws are even madder than the mainland. ALL airguns over 1 joule are classed as firearms, and all purchases of reloading supplies are noted in your Firearms Certificate.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
half-genius,
half-wit
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
What I was pointing out was that everyday, average, Jane or Joe Citizen cannot carry a firearm for self defense. That only agents of the government are so-blessed.

Yup that is correct. here in UK except for the 3500 or so in Northern Ireland, the average Joe or Joette can not carry a firearm for PP.

Curious about that. Why are the gun laws so much less Draconian in N. Ireland? Given the history, one would think it would be just the opposite.

Re: Those PP licenses: Is it "may issue" or "shall issue" there? I.e.: Do you have to show a need, or does the government have to demonstrate why not?

quote:
Originally posted by tacfoley:
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
tac, I'm not nicking the U.K. for Her laws. Well, ok, I am, but they are what the majority of the citizens want, I guess, so, in that respect, I'm not.

The citizen has NO say in the law-making in UK.

Then I'm more confused than I thought I was.

There are two houses of Parliament: The House of Commons (aka: "lower house") and the House of Lords (aka: "upper house"). It's my understanding bills must be passed by both houses to become law. While the upper house appears to be more-or-less a good ol' boys club, the lower house appears to be roughly equivalent to our House of Representatives in that members are elected by popular vote.


Yup, Members of Parliament ARE elected by the popular vote. But the first one to stand up and ask for the repeal of the Firearms Act in favour of one less draconian would be looking for a job after lunch.

The fact that almost 6 million of us don't shoot anybody on a daily basis, and that each and every one of us has been authorised to own our guns by the Home Secretary, in fact, his devolved empowerment of the county Chief Constable, seems to have utterly been ignored.
 
Posts: 11641 | Location: UK, OR, ONT | Registered: July 10, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    New Zealand stores ban knives after mass stabbing

© SIGforum 2025