July 08, 2019, 04:24 PM
CQB60Fed District Judge Rules US Can't Ask Citizenship Question on Census
Justice Roberts has his head stuck in his rear. First supports 0blunder care. Now shoots down a census question that should be the first question asked on a census?
July 08, 2019, 06:33 PM
Monkquote:
Originally posted by nhtagmember:
ignore the judge and keep going
This. The court does not have the ability to enforce its decision. Ignore it.
July 08, 2019, 07:41 PM
wrightdI don't know much history but I read somewhere that (maybe) Abe Lincoln ignored a SCOTUS ruling ? If the SCOTUS starts ruling really stupid things, then what choice do people have ? Stupidity has its bounds for normal people.
July 08, 2019, 08:41 PM
Hamden106quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
Yeah, why would you want to count the citizens when you're counting the citizens?
I'm telling you- I hope to live to see the shit come down when the good people of this nation have had enough. I do. I hope to see it. Myself, I am fed the fuck up with this nonsense.
Yes. Me too.
July 08, 2019, 08:49 PM
Skins2881quote:
Originally posted by zoom6zoom:
OK, so this is all bullshit.
Turns out that the citizenship question has pretty much ALWAYS been included in the census.
When was it removed?
In 2010, by the Obama administration.
Yep. 2000 census pictured here, but it's completely illegal and un-American to put back into census a question that last administration removed. I'm not much of a constitutional scholar, can someone explain that to me?
July 08, 2019, 11:51 PM
sdy https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...barr-census-n2549719In a visit to South Carolina on Monday, U.S. Attorney General William Barr said the Trump administration will present a legal work-around that will allow a question on citizenship to be added to the 2020 Census.
Speaking to reporters after a scheduled stop at a federal prison, Barr said, “I think over the next day or two you’ll see what approach we’re taking and I think it does provide a pathway for getting the question on the census.”
He did not provide details in his brief remarks.