There’s no better explanation for the current progressive meltdown.

National Review
Victor Davis Hanson

Key Trump administration officials have been confronted at restaurants. Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) urged protesters to hound Trump officials at restaurants, gas stations, or department stores.

Progressive pundits and the liberal media almost daily think up new ways of characterizing President Trump as a Nazi, fascist, tyrant, or buffoon. Celebrities openly fantasize about doing harm to Trump.

What is behind the unprecedented furor?

Just as Barack Obama was not a centrist, neither is Trump. Obama promised to fundamentally transform the United States. Trump pledged to do the same and more — but in the exact opposite direction.

The Trump agenda enrages the Left in much the same manner that Obamacare, the Obama tax hikes, Obama’s liberal Supreme Court picks, and the Iran nuclear deal goaded the Right.

Yet the current progressive meltdown is about more than just political differences. The outrage is mostly about power — or rather, the utter and unexpected loss of it.

In 2009, Obama seemed to usher in a progressive revolution for a generation.

Democrats controlled the House. They had a supermajority in the Senate. Obama had a chance to ensure a liberal majority on the Supreme Court for years.

Democrats had gained on Republicans at the state and local levels. The media, universities, professional sports, Hollywood, and popular culture were all solidly left-wing.

A Republican had not won 51 percent of the popular vote in a presidential election since George H.W. Bush’s 1988 defeat of Democrat Michael Dukakis. Before 2016, Republicans had lost the popular vote in five of the previous six presidential elections.

And then visions of a generation of progressive grandeur abruptly vanished.

Obama left behind a polarized nation. Democrats lost both the House and the Senate. During Obama’s tenure, Democrats lost more than 1,000 seats at the state level.

Presumptive winner Hillary Clinton blew the 2016 presidential election.

Foolishly, Clinton tried to ensure a landslide victory by wasting precious campaign time in unwinnable red states such as Arizona and Georgia. Meanwhile, she too often neglected winnable purple states such as Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, all of which Obama had won in 2008 and 2012. Clinton apparently forgot that the Electoral College, not the popular vote, elects a president.

After his election, President Trump did not implode as predicted. By following the Obama precedent of relying on executive orders, Trump began recalibrating everything from immigration enforcement to energy development.

Abroad, Trump did what no other Republican president would have dared, bombing ISIS into submission, canceling the Iran deal, seeking to denuclearize North Korea, pulling out of the Paris climate accord, and moving the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

The U.S. economy took off with new tax cuts and deregulation. Radical improvement in unemployment, economic growth, and oil and natural-gas production created new consumer and business confidence.

Despite his frequent crudeness, Trump is inching toward a 50 percent approval rating in a few polls. That has only made an impotent opposition grow even more furious — both at the other half of the country for supporting Trump, and at a buoyant Trump himself for baiting and ridiculing progressives in the fashion of no prior president.

Worse still, much of the loss of progressive power was at least partly self-inflicted.

Former Democratic Senate majority leader Harry Reid foolishly dropped the number of votes needed to overcome a filibuster for executive appointments and most judicial nominations in 2013. That blunder ensured Republicans the chance to remake the Supreme Court when they took over the Senate in 2014.

Obama chose not to try to win over his opposition, but to alienate it by veering hard left in his second term. Hillary Clinton foolishly got herself into a number of personal scandals that embarrassed her party and helped lead to her defeat.

In reaction to the sudden loss of political power, Democrats would have been wise to run to the center, as did Bill Clinton, who all but ended the era of the Reagan Republicans.

They could have dropped their obsession with identity politics and instead attempted to win over blue-collar voters with more inclusive class appeals rather than racial appeals.

Instead, Democrats have endlessly replayed the 2016 election. In Groundhog Day fashion, Hillary Clinton repeatedly offered tired excuses for her loss.

To progressives, Trump became not an opponent to be beaten with a better agenda, but an evil to be destroyed. Moderate Democrats were written off as dense; left-wing fringe elements were praised as clever.

Voters in 2016 bristled at redistribution, open borders, bigger government, and higher taxes, but progressives are now promising those voters even more of what they didn’t want.

Furious over the sudden and unexpected loss of power, enraged progressives have so far done almost everything to lose even more of it.

And that paradox only leads to more furor.

Link

Having just watched "Hillary's America" and the premise of the multiple big cons over the years, one can appreciate how well the long con the Dem's are playing has been doing.

To this end, one wonders if the there is a powerful dynamic of: 1) mistakenly believing in the con, 2) apprehensive in not admitting one is being conned that is resulting in the vehement fervor of the progressives.

Believing in something and not wanting to admit you've been wrong all these years -- these idiots are entrenched. The latter leading also perhaps to some inner shame and self loathing that they assert on the right.

Arm chair psychology. Just don't know how so many millions could be so mentally ill.

This highlights a point that I think is underappreciated, although I suppose I could just be gloating.

The GDCs really thought they were on the verge of a new era. As in, they really thought that anyone who didn't agree with them would have to just go die off or spend the rest of their lives moping in a corner. And why not? Obama made this magical thing happen with the stroke of a pen, Obama made that magical thing happen in court despite the overwhelming precedent to the contrary, and he just kept on talking in that smooth, confident tone of voice that let you know he could seeeeee the mountaintop and all of the little Dems would get there soon.

Only it all turned out to be so shallow, didn't it? So much of it has been (and, we hope, will be) eliminated with a stroke of Trump's pen. So much of it has gone or will go away in the Supreme Court. So much of it is now unfunded, unsupported in court by the DOJ (remember O's administration's "defense" of the law against gay marriage?), or simply...not, anymore, that those losses alone would have to come as a shock. As harbingers of a new era, those losses are absolutely devastating.

But man, for a while there? They really believed they'd won it all forever.

I see the word "foolishly" used over and over again in the article.

So, basically:

Democrats = Fools

I'm not sure if it's because they can't come to grips with the situation.

I think this is part of their playbook. Unfortunately for them, Trump doesn't give a shit because Trump knows it doesn't pay off trying to appease them.

I'd like to see them lose so much power they hide in a dark room and cut themselves....

Just wait till Trump announces his scotus pick on July 9th. Heads will explode,lol

Re: “Clinton apparently forgot that the Electoral College, not the popular vote, elects a president.”

Candidate Trump didn’t make that mistake.