SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    How to keep valves in direct injection engines clean?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How to keep valves in direct injection engines clean? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted
As Techtron, Seafoam, etc., added to the gas tank won't reach the valves what is the best DIY way to do this? I assume something through air intake? Any suggestions?


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 7376 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
The cleaner has to go in through the air intake, either at a vacuum source like a PCV line or brake booster line, or through the throttle body, while the engine is running. I am sure one of these kits will include some method of metering the chemical in so as not to cause the engine to load up and miss or stall or even hydro-lock.

These GDI engines are one time I will recommend the intake system cleaning. It doesn't really do anything for port-fuel-injected engines. Although black goop does build up on the inside of the intake manifold itself, it doesn't hurt anything. If I had a GDI I'd do it probably every 30-50,000 miles. That way you keep it clean to start with and not wait until the carbon causes valves to stick and more drastic measures are needed.
 
Posts: 29037 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of BlackTalonJHP
posted Hide Post
Seafoam with the bent straw for use via air intake.
Link
 
Posts: 1114 | Location: Texas | Registered: September 18, 2019Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
I’ve become a LiquiMoly fan boy!

https://www.liqui-moly.com/en/...r-p000072.html#20210



————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 25827 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Technically Adaptive
posted Hide Post
Gm has a top engine cleaner that works well, they have a tool for using it but you may be able to use something different, just don't hydro lock the engine.

PDF file :
https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/t...MC-10161932-9999.pdf
 
Posts: 1438 | Location: Willcox, AZ | Registered: September 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Republican in training
Picture of DonDraper
posted Hide Post
I'd 100% look into getting a proper walnut blasting/cleaning done if you have plenty of miles and you know it's in definite need of cleaning. You are most likely not even going to put a dent in it with any sort of product no matter how you get it through to the valves.

Long story short - if you are due for a clean up get it done right. Squirting cleaner in there is not going to get it done.


--------------------
I like Sigs and HK's, and maybe Glocks
 
Posts: 2289 | Location: SC | Registered: March 16, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 4MUL8R
posted Hide Post
Intake Valve Deposits (IVD) in GDI engines are real, and can cause issues. Ford and Toyota created "dual injection" engines with both PFI and GDI injectors because of the IVD.

You are commended for seeking to keep your IVD low.

Another method some have used is a "catch can" between the PCV circuit and the return hose to the manifold. Here, moisture, oil vapor, etc. collect and do not contribute to the IVD.

IVD is a complex chemical reaction, due in part to engine oil and specific engine oil components.

Do good research on use of such spray-in cleaners prior to using one.

One tried and true method is a very slow water injection or introduction into the manifold. This method requires much care. However, in our lab test engine dyno cells, a water cleaning is both working and specified for a particular engine test.


-------
Trying to simplify my life...
 
Posts: 5262 | Location: Commonwealth of Virginia | Registered: January 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
I like CRC GDI Intave Valve Cleaner --> https://www.crcindustries.com/gdi/

My experience as a result of an extremely thorough 'Carbon Clean' of a Audi 4.2L V8, was that PEA was THE Most Effective active ingredient in removing carbon from the Intake Ports/Valves. I used CRC GDI Intake Valve Cleaner (claims highest PEA content!) on the Port Dividers, and in the Intake Ports after the mechanical removal of all of the big stuff, followed by abrasive blasting (w/ walnut shells) in order to clean the back side if the valve stems and low in/on the floor of the port near the valve pocket where Walnut Blasting was not effective.

Due to 'supply chain issues' last summer, the CRC Intake Valve Cleaner was hard to find and I could only get two cans. When I realized was running low (and need to conserve the good stuff!), I bought a can of Sea-Foam, which did absolutely NOTHING on the carbon! By comparison, the CRC seemed to dissolve the 'carbon buildup' compared to the Sea-Foam, and I attribute this to the PEA.

This is a representative Intake Port after the Carbon Clean...



Here's the Engine post 'Carbon Clean' just prior to installing the Fuel Rails and Intake Manifolds...



This particular Direct Injection V8 is prone to Carbon Buildup, so I plan to use it through the Intake at around 175K miles.


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 9646 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Saluki
posted Hide Post
I’ll take this opportunity to add a caution about turbocharged engines.

You’re running the real risk of grenading your turbo running cleaners through the engine. Ford has not come up with a chemical solution that they will recommend. They are firmly in the swap heads camp. Do some research if you have a turbo engine.


----------The weather is here I wish you were beautiful----------
 
Posts: 5258 | Location: southern Mn | Registered: February 26, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
Good info, thanks guys.
The vehicle I'm concerned about is my 2023 Ridgeline. It only has maybe 6,000 miles on it now but I'd like to stay ahead of it, doing something prior to its next oil change and subsequent ones. Or is every 5,000 miles overkill?
I'll continue to use Techtron on my Corolla which has direct and port injection.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 7376 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by reflex/deflex64:
You’re running the real risk of grenading your turbo running cleaners through the engine.
How? The cleaner goes directly into the intake, which is after the turbo. When it goes out the exhaust through the turbo it has largely been burned. Perhaps I'm missing something,
 
Posts: 29037 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ridewv:
Or is every 5,000 miles overkill?

IMO, way overkill. 30 is more like it.
 
Posts: 29037 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Am The Walrus
posted Hide Post
If you want to stay ahead, use top tier fuel in it.

Do you have Costco by you? They are not only top tier but typically 20-30 cents cheaper per gallon versus other top tier stations such as Mobil, Shell, BP, etc.


_____________

 
Posts: 13355 | Registered: March 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by egregore:
quote:
Originally posted by reflex/deflex64:
You’re running the real risk of grenading your turbo running cleaners through the engine.
How? The cleaner goes directly into the intake, which is after the turbo. When it goes out the exhaust through the turbo it has largely been burned. Perhaps I'm missing something,


Backfires and higher than normal temps on turbos that are directly after manifold and carbon chunks are the concern as well as damage to O2 sensors.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21336 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
Pardon ignorance but would catch cans be useful?



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 29997 | Location: Norris Lake, TN | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by egregore:
quote:
Originally posted by ridewv:
Or is every 5,000 miles overkill?

IMO, way overkill. 30 is more like it.


OK I may do it every 20K or so but still use Techtron prior to each oil change to help clean the combustion area and top of the pistons.



quote:
Originally posted by Edmond:
If you want to stay ahead, use top tier fuel in it.



I try to buy often use Sheetz or Kroger gas too, probably top tier (Shell or Exxon) 1/2 the fill ups.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 7376 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skins2881:
Backfires and higher than normal temps on turbos that are directly after manifold and carbon chunks are the concern as well as damage to O2 sensors.

Hmm … maybe. If not allowed to get to the point of being encrusted and the cleaner is metered in a controlled manner, I don't see a problem. In any event, if my research is correct, the '23 Ridgeline has a V6 with GDI, but no turbo.
 
Posts: 29037 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No More
Mr. Nice Guy
posted Hide Post
In the Subaru world, catch cans are a fad in the affected model years. However, their usefulness is questionable.

Oil consumption which recirculates to the intake is the problem. That is what cokes the valves. In the USA the recommended oil is 0W-20, but elsewhere is 5W-30. Looking at the temperature ranges for the oil weights shows no worries going thicker except in extreme cold (below about -30 iirc).

So you first of all may not have much problem with valve carbon build up if you aren't consuming oil. You might be able to go to a thicker oil. I was consuming oil with the 0W-20 but not at all with 5W-30. Check your owners manual and research what the factory approves in other countries for the exact same engine.
 
Posts: 9846 | Location: On the mountain off the grid | Registered: February 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
Another concern with Catch Cans is their use in cold climates. Below 32 degrees F the condensate will freeze, potentially resulting in ZERO crankcase ventilation! This would cause issues, not solve them! As such, winter use in cold(er) climates necessitates being diligent to empty the Catch Can VERY frequently. Also, depending on the vehicle and the available under hood space for mounting, installing one may not be practical. Further, one needs to ensure there no 'traps' exist in the resulting plumbing/hoses if you do install one.

Generally the OEM likely did significant R&D to develop the PCV System, so you need to ensure it's properly maintained and functioning as designed. Any catch can installation would need to be a supplement to that system, and NOT compromise it's function. As such, my research has indicated that if one does install a Catch Can, it should be installed upstream in between the OEM device/PCV and the crankcase vent, NOT downstream in between the PCV and the Intake Manifold. Doing so ensures, the Catch Can reduces the load of the factory PCV and doesn't just handle the overflow. Otherwise your Catch Can won't really be doing much to improve the system until it's no longer functioning properly.


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 9646 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Optimistic Cynic
Picture of architect
posted Hide Post
OK, so I'm not afraid to show my ignorance here...

  • How does one know that one's engine is a DI?
  • Can you tell by looking (without removing manifolds, etc.)?
  • Does "fuel injection" imply DI, or are there other ways to get fuel into cylinders


Yeah, I get that fuel injected engines don't have carbs, but what makes a DI engine a DI engine? Are there code words in a manufacturer's engine description that will reveal this information?
 
Posts: 6930 | Location: NoVA | Registered: July 22, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    How to keep valves in direct injection engines clean?

© SIGforum 2024