SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    4x6 beam question for rebuilding deck
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
4x6 beam question for rebuilding deck Login/Join 
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted
I've decided to use a 4x6 in (nominal) pressure treated beam resting on 4x6 in adjustable post bases ( http://www.homedepot.com/p/Sim...ase-ABA46Z/100375175 ), bolted to sonotube poured concrete pillars. The problem is, the beam needs to be 23 ft in length, and I don't know if 24 ft beams in 4x6 actually exist. If they don't, what are my options ? The actual width of the beam needs to be 3-1/2 inch to fit in the galvanized post base.

Any advice appreciated. Arc ?




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9101 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Only option I can think of would be to "sister" 2x6's if that would be acceptable from a structural standpoint.
 
Posts: 2117 | Location: Just outside of Zion and Bryce Canyon NP's | Registered: March 18, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Only the strong survive
Picture of 41
posted Hide Post
Powers idea is great. Maybe even use a 2 by 8 if you need more load bearing for that span.

2 x 6 x 24 feet are $19.27 at Lowes.


41
 
Posts: 11918 | Location: Herndon, VA | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too old to run,
too mean to quit!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 41:
Powers idea is great. Maybe even use a 2 by 8 if you need more load bearing for that span.

2 x 6 x 24 feet are $19.27 at Lowes.


Not knowing the span between support posts, it would be difficult to say what beams would be right.

Having said that, I strongly suspect that if I were doing that deck I would be using at least 2x10s.


Elk

There has never been an occasion where a people gave up their weapons in the interest of peace that didn't end in their massacre. (Louis L'Amour)

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. "
-Thomas Jefferson

"America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Alexis de Tocqueville

FBHO!!!



The Idaho Elk Hunter
 
Posts: 25656 | Location: Virginia | Registered: December 16, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of was0311
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wrightd:
I've decided to use a 4x6 in (nominal) pressure treated beam resting on 4x6 in adjustable post bases ( http://www.homedepot.com/p/Sim...ase-ABA46Z/100375175 ), bolted to sonotube poured concrete pillars. The problem is, the beam needs to be 23 ft in length, and I don't know if 24 ft beams in 4x6 actually exist. If they don't, what are my options ? The actual width of the beam needs to be 3-1/2 inch to fit in the galvanized post base.

Any advice appreciated. Arc ?


What is your span? I would just splice together 2x's, depth dependent on span. You can find nailing patterns on the web.

Really you shouldn't need a 4" wide beam though.
 
Posts: 2654 | Location: Eastern NE | Registered: July 12, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted Hide Post
The problem with doubling 2x6 or 2x8 boards is that the result is only 3 in thick, but it needs to be 3-1/2 in thick, which is the actual thickness of a 4x6 or 4x8 nominal.

I've seen something about sandwiching plywood between the boards, but I don't know what nominal thickness of plywood is 1/2 actual, to make up the difference for a total of of 3-1/2, or what type of plywood would be proper. Is there pressure treated plywood using the same chemicals used in the pressure treated lumber ?

Span is another question, which may depend on the type and size of the resulting beam.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9101 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by was0311:
quote:
Originally posted by wrightd:
I've decided to use a 4x6 in (nominal) pressure treated beam resting on 4x6 in adjustable post bases ( http://www.homedepot.com/p/Sim...ase-ABA46Z/100375175 ), bolted to sonotube poured concrete pillars. The problem is, the beam needs to be 23 ft in length, and I don't know if 24 ft beams in 4x6 actually exist. If they don't, what are my options ? The actual width of the beam needs to be 3-1/2 inch to fit in the galvanized post base.

Any advice appreciated. Arc ?


What is your span? I would just splice together 2x's, depth dependent on span. You can find nailing patterns on the web.

Really you shouldn't need a 4" wide beam though.


The beam wouldn't be 4", it would be 3.5 actual, which is 4x nominal. I haven't figured out span yet, until I can figure out how to make a beam that's 3.5 inch thick, to fit the 4x6 in galvy base plates.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9101 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Essayons
Picture of SapperSteel
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wrightd:
The problem with doubling 2x6 or 2x8 boards is that the result is only 3 in thick, but it needs to be 3-1/2 in thick, which is the actual thickness of a 4x6 or 4x8 nominal.

I've seen something about sandwiching plywood between the boards, but I don't know what nominal thickness of plywood is 1/2 actual, to make up the difference for a total of of 3-1/2, or what type of plywood would be proper. Is there pressure treated plywood using the same chemicals used in the pressure treated lumber ?

Span is another question, which may depend on the type and size of the resulting beam.


A couple of pertinent comments from a structural engineer:

  • Anytime you get over about 15' in span length with a timber beam you're looking for trouble. A 23' span is too long for sawn lumber, especially for a member holding up a floor. You need intermediate supports if you're going to use sawn lumber. If you want to stick with wood at that span length, then consider going to a glulam beam (expensive!).

  • Even if you insert an intermediate support at mid-span, reducing your span from 23' to 11'-6", a six-inch deep sawn lumber beam won't have enough strength to carry the load. You need to go to a deeper beam.

  • Unlike S4S sawn lumber, there is no difference between the actual thickness and the nominal thickness of plywood. To get the 3-1/2" beam width you're looking for you need to insert a strip of 1/2" plywood between the two outer pieces of 2x lumber. This is what is done for lintels over doorways and windows, for example, to get a width that matches the rest of the stud wall width. You won't be counting on the plywood to provide any structural (flexural) strength, it's just a spacer, so it need not be continuous over the length of the beam.


    Thanks,

    Sap
  •  
    Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Nosce te ipsum
    Picture of Woodman
    posted Hide Post
    In pricing a beer keg ramp, I called a saw mill 60 miles west. Far in the country. The lumber price was less than half and they cut it on the spot to exactly what you want.

    Five 3 x 6 x 12' full were $94 tax included. The mill charges by the board foot. This is for red oak.

    Do you have a truck that can haul a 24' board?
     
    Posts: 8759 | Registered: March 24, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    Picture of was0311
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by wrightd:
    The problem with doubling 2x6 or 2x8 boards is that the result is only 3 in thick, but it needs to be 3-1/2 in thick, which is the actual thickness of a 4x6 or 4x8 nominal.

    I've seen something about sandwiching plywood between the boards, but I don't know what nominal thickness of plywood is 1/2 actual, to make up the difference for a total of of 3-1/2, or what type of plywood would be proper. Is there pressure treated plywood using the same chemicals used in the pressure treated lumber ?

    Span is another question, which may depend on the type and size of the resulting beam.


    You could use PT plywood in between joist, it won't weather as well as the joists if installed vertically. Is there a reason you want such a wide beam? You should be able to find narrower ties to you sonotubes (great idea btw) without more expense.

    Edit: Just read your original post. You could use those supports, just add blocking so they are tied to either side. Really, you should be able to find joist supports to embed to the sonos.
     
    Posts: 2654 | Location: Eastern NE | Registered: July 12, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    posted Hide Post
    Sister 2x boards. I built a deck with several beams that size using sistered 2x8s carriage bolted to notched 6x6 posts that were set on concrete with brackets. The posts were located at the ends of each beam and under each splice. The deck was only 2.5 feet off the ground but it was very sturdy.
     
    Posts: 1015 | Location: Tampa | Registered: July 27, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    Picture of MBOYD
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by SapperSteel:
    quote:
    Originally posted by wrightd:
    The problem with doubling 2x6 or 2x8 boards is that the result is only 3 in thick, but it needs to be 3-1/2 in thick, which is the actual thickness of a 4x6 or 4x8 nominal.

    I've seen something about sandwiching plywood between the boards, but I don't know what nominal thickness of plywood is 1/2 actual, to make up the difference for a total of of 3-1/2, or what type of plywood would be proper. Is there pressure treated plywood using the same chemicals used in the pressure treated lumber ?

    Span is another question, which may depend on the type and size of the resulting beam.


    A couple of pertinent comments from a structural engineer:

  • Anytime you get over about 15' in span length with a timber beam you're looking for trouble. A 23' span is too long for sawn lumber, especially for a member holding up a floor. You need intermediate supports if you're going to use sawn lumber. If you want to stick with wood at that span length, then consider going to a glulam beam (expensive!).

  • Even if you insert an intermediate support at mid-span, reducing your span from 23' to 11'-6", a six-inch deep sawn lumber beam won't have enough strength to carry the load. You need to go to a deeper beam.

  • Unlike S4S sawn lumber, there is no difference between the actual thickness and the nominal thickness of plywood. To get the 3-1/2" beam width you're looking for you need to insert a strip of 1/2" plywood between the two outer pieces of 2x lumber. This is what is done for lintels over doorways and windows, for example, to get a width that matches the rest of the stud wall width. You won't be counting on the plywood to provide any structural (flexural) strength, it's just a spacer, so it need not be continuous over the length of the beam.


  • This exactly. Guy knows his stuff. Engineered lumber is way stronger than sawn lumber (in the longer lengths). You will save yourself a ton of grief
     
    Posts: 684 | Registered: December 20, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    Picture of wrightd
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by SapperSteel:
    quote:
    Originally posted by wrightd:
    The problem with doubling 2x6 or 2x8 boards is that the result is only 3 in thick, but it needs to be 3-1/2 in thick, which is the actual thickness of a 4x6 or 4x8 nominal.

    I've seen something about sandwiching plywood between the boards, but I don't know what nominal thickness of plywood is 1/2 actual, to make up the difference for a total of of 3-1/2, or what type of plywood would be proper. Is there pressure treated plywood using the same chemicals used in the pressure treated lumber ?

    Span is another question, which may depend on the type and size of the resulting beam.


    A couple of pertinent comments from a structural engineer:

  • Anytime you get over about 15' in span length with a timber beam you're looking for trouble. A 23' span is too long for sawn lumber, especially for a member holding up a floor. You need intermediate supports if you're going to use sawn lumber. If you want to stick with wood at that span length, then consider going to a glulam beam (expensive!).

  • Even if you insert an intermediate support at mid-span, reducing your span from 23' to 11'-6", a six-inch deep sawn lumber beam won't have enough strength to carry the load. You need to go to a deeper beam.

  • Unlike S4S sawn lumber, there is no difference between the actual thickness and the nominal thickness of plywood. To get the 3-1/2" beam width you're looking for you need to insert a strip of 1/2" plywood between the two outer pieces of 2x lumber. This is what is done for lintels over doorways and windows, for example, to get a width that matches the rest of the stud wall width. You won't be counting on the plywood to provide any structural (flexural) strength, it's just a spacer, so it need not be continuous over the length of the beam.

  • A listen closely to structural engineers. To answer your points:

    The beam will be 23 feet long, but I will be putting in pier supports at any frequency required, whatever is appropriate. I never intended using a beam that long only supported at the ends, I didn't communicate that clearly.

    Regarding your comment about a beam depth, I have flexibility. The deeper the beam, the lower height my sonotube cement piers, because I won't be using any posts between the galvy shoe and the beam itself, because this section of the deck is very close to the ground. If you can suggest a depth of beam and spacing of pier supports, that would solve the hardest part of replacing this improperly built deck I inherited. The load will be normal 40 psf for decks, on 8 foot joists, with the ends anchored to a 2x whatever header board attached to the house, and some length of overhanging on the beam on the other side. The deck that it is replacing it is 8 feet deep by 23 feet in length long-wise along the house. Very simple, but this is the crutch of the whole problem for me. So I basically need a recommendation for beam depth and distance between each pier support underneath. The existing old deck it is replacing was completely improperly built in almost any way you could imagine. It was so bad, I even knew it was a problem, and I'm not an engineer nor carpenter by any stretch. But I'm handy and enjoy the work. I'm not committed to 40 psf, I'm glad to overbuild rather than underbuild, that's the way I approach everything in life anyway. It pays off in software, so I'm sure it pays off in carpentry up to a point.

    Regarding your statement about the plywood not providing flexural strength, that is good to know, I had no idea that was the case. I didn't know that nominal = actual in plywood, so that answers that question. But if I did build a beam with 1/2 plywood in the center, would ext grade work with the pressure treated lumber ? Or would that plywood not be moisture and insect resistant equivalent of the lumber sides ? Or could I paint the plywood with copper preservative, then seal the edges, etc. ?




    Lover of the US Constitution
    Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
     
    Posts: 9101 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    posted Hide Post
    Do you really have a 23' unsupported span? If so 4x6 is WAY undersized.
    If you have a 23' span supported by multiple footings, you have many options.
    Sistered 2x lumber with 1/2 plywood sandwiched makes the correct thickness..
     
    Posts: 1107 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: August 16, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Not really from Vienna
    Picture of arfmel
    posted Hide Post
    Is this new pressure treated wood compatible with galvanized steel fittings? Seems to me I read that it wasn't.
     
    Posts: 27283 | Location: SW of Hovey, Texas | Registered: January 30, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    Picture of wrightd
    posted Hide Post
    Guess I better check. I'd imagine it would be, but I'll call Simpson Strongtie and ask.




    Lover of the US Constitution
    Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
     
    Posts: 9101 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Essayons
    Picture of SapperSteel
    posted Hide Post
    quote:
    Originally posted by wrightd:
    . . .Any advice appreciated. Arc ?


    You've been using the term "beam". I think what you really mean is "joist". But maybe not. What rests on the top surface of your "beam"? Is it your deck boards (in which case we're really talking about joists), or is it the bottom of joists that cross it at a 90 degree angle (in which case it really is a beam)? Or, are you using saddles to hang your joists off the side of your beam?

    Word "pictures" are hard to convey. A sketch would be really useful.

    To give you any useful advice on member sizes for your deck, I need to know:

    -- What is the spacing of your joists center-to-center?

    -- What dimension lumber are you using for your deck?

    -- What kind of lumber, ie: what species of wood? For example: white pine, Idaho pine, oak, or something else? The different species have significantly different maximum flexural and compressive and shear stress values.

    -- What loads do you plan to put on your deck?

    -- How do you plan to fasten all the members together?


    Thanks,

    Sap
     
    Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    Picture of cparktd
    posted Hide Post
    Probably no help but...

    I built a large Gazebo (18 x 20 roof) and anchored it down. It was built to be moveable if so desired, think like a mini barn built on runners, but I used 3 6x6 beams for runners.

    I just set 1/2 inch anchor bolts in the concrete piers, then drilled through the beam and using a coupling nut bolted through the beam with a bolt, actually used threaded rods cut to length.

    But if your beam is only 3 inches thick you might not want to drill through it. If using three 2x6" or 8" (4.5 inches thick) and it would be fine.

    A quick and dirty sketch...




    Collecting dust.
     
    Posts: 4220 | Location: Middle Tennessee | Registered: February 07, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    E Pluribus Unum
    Picture of JRC
    posted Hide Post
    For a 23' span use 4 posts/footings. If you go 7' apart (on center) the footings/posts on the outside edges will be 1' inside the outer edge of the deck.

    Then build your 23' beam out of 2 - 2"x8"x24', with 1/2" plywood between (to make up for your 3 1/2" post bases).

    Easy-peasy Wink
     
    Posts: 1407 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: March 05, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
    Member
    posted Hide Post
    You may want to look at the CPTZ concealed post tie from simpson strong tie. Basically, it is a knife-blade post anchor that can go in between 2 ganged 2X's and provide a bolt-through connection. It takes 2 anchors into the piers and has a 1" standoff plate (code) so the beam isn't directly in contact with the concrete.

    Ken
     
    Posts: 1052 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: December 28, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
      Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
     

    SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    4x6 beam question for rebuilding deck

    © SIGforum 2024