July 03, 2019, 06:29 PM
olfuzzyJudge Blocks AG Barr Rule On Detaining Some Asylum Seekers For Duration Of Cases
I'm really getting fed up with these Judges
Another federal judge has ruled against another immigration policy from the Trump administration. On Tuesday, Seattle-based Judge Marsha Pechman blocked a new rule by Attorney General William Barr aimed at detaining some so-called asylum seekers for the duration of their cases.
The Clinton appointee said the Justice Department’s rule was unconstitutional and violated migrants’ purported right to due process under the Fifth Amendment. She also cited a Supreme Court ruling on unnecessary incarceration. The judge has ordered that asylum seekers be released from U.S. custody within seven-days after their initial hearing.
Back in April, Attorney General Barr reversed a 2005 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals. He declared that migrants who present a credible fear of return to country of origin were not eligible for bond, and should remain in U.S. custody until their cases are heard and decided. Barr invoked a statue from the Immigration and Nationality Act to support his decision. The move was a part of an immigration crackdown by the White House aimed at stemming the flow of illegal immigration at the southern border.
The White House has since spoke out on latest attempt at blocking the administration’s immigration policy reform. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said the judge’s decision to block the long-term detention of some asylum seekers was “at war with the rule of law.” She said the move by the judge would only encourage smugglers and traffickers to keep overwhelming the U.S. immigration system.
https://www.oann.com/judge-blo...r-duration-of-cases/July 03, 2019, 06:47 PM
45 CalSo fricken sick of these judges trying to over throw the this president and his appointees.
July 03, 2019, 06:52 PM
Skins2881Jeez. Just pack them up into planes fly them the fuck home set up video conferences from home countries and hear their cases while they are back home in a comfortable environment when their number gets called. Problem solved. Option B, apply for asylum in Mexico at the first safe country you enter. People fleeing persecution based on race, religion, blah, blah, blah don't get to choose their destination. If it were really that bad, they'd be overjoyed to be in relatively safe Mexico accross the border from the genocide or whatever BS excuse they are using.
We all know why they are coming. They live in a shithole country and they want more for their children and family. A noble quest up until they point you break several international laws then finally our laws. Get in fucking line, it might take a while to get here, but it will be legal.
July 03, 2019, 10:18 PM
nhtagmemberignore the judge
really, what she going to do?
do what you need to do to deal with the problem the democrats have created, and someone will deal with the judge at a later date
am I allowed to hold that twunt in contempt of America?
July 03, 2019, 11:33 PM
chellim1quote:
White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said the judge’s decision to block the long-term detention of some asylum seekers was “at war with the rule of law.” She said the move by the judge would only encourage smugglers and traffickers to keep overwhelming the U.S. immigration system.
The rule of law is over.
Welcome to the jungle.
July 04, 2019, 08:18 AM
wrightdWhen feds ignore fed law the weaken the rule of law in the minds of the citizenry. The jungle has dangers indeed.