SIGforum
Clarence Thomas is now the longest-serving SCOTUS Justice

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/320601935/m/5670063654

May 04, 2019, 10:52 AM
Pipe Smoker
Clarence Thomas is now the longest-serving SCOTUS Justice
“WASHINGTON (AP) — Clarence Thomas has been a Supreme Court justice for nearly three decades. It may finally be his moment.

Many Americans know Thomas largely from his bruising 1991 confirmation hearing, when he was accused of sexual harassment charges by former employee Anita Hill — charges he denied. People may know he’s a conservative and has gone years without speaking during arguments at the court. But scholars say it would be wise to pay closer attention to Thomas.

Thomas is now the longest-serving member of a court that has recently gotten more conservative, putting him in a unique and potentially powerful position, and he’s said he doesn’t plan on retiring anytime soon. With President Donald Trump’s nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh now on the court, conservatives are firmly in control as the justices take on divisive issues such as abortion, gun control and LGBT rights…”

https://apnews.com/fbb07af9d5254aecbbab9422faf405ba



Serious about crackers.
May 04, 2019, 11:03 AM
12131
quote:
Thomas is now the longest-serving member of a court that has recently gotten more conservative, putting him in a unique and potentially powerful position, and he’s said he doesn’t plan on retiring anytime soon. With President Donald Trump’s nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh now on the court, conservatives are firmly in control

"Firmly in control"? Roberts is trying hard to be Kennedy.


Q






May 04, 2019, 11:29 AM
goose5
Thomas makes my top five I'd like to have dinner with list. He's pushing 80. While I'm a big fan he needs to retire so that seat is under the control of the right for a replacement. What is it about this job that people feel they have to die doing it?


_________________________
OH, Bonnie McMurray!
May 04, 2019, 11:56 AM
egregore

May 04, 2019, 03:44 PM
bigdeal
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Thomas is now the longest-serving member of a court that has recently gotten more conservative, putting him in a unique and potentially powerful position, and he’s said he doesn’t plan on retiring anytime soon. With President Donald Trump’s nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh now on the court, conservatives are firmly in control

"Firmly in control"? Roberts is trying hard to be Kennedy.
If only RBG would kick and President Trump could replace her with a solid conservative. That would render Roberts all but irrelevant when it came to voting. I look forward to that happening very soon.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
May 04, 2019, 10:16 PM
oddball
As much as I appreciate Thomas' time on the SCOTUS, he is 80 yo. Especially if Trump wins a 2nd term and hopefully holds on to the Senate, it might be prudent for Thomas to retire and give Trump another appointee.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
May 05, 2019, 01:59 AM
grumpy1
Clarence Thomas is 70 years old. Born June 23, 1948.
May 05, 2019, 02:05 AM
grumpy1
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Thomas is now the longest-serving member of a court that has recently gotten more conservative, putting him in a unique and potentially powerful position, and he’s said he doesn’t plan on retiring anytime soon. With President Donald Trump’s nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh now on the court, conservatives are firmly in control

"Firmly in control"? Roberts is trying hard to be Kennedy.


Yes he voted with the activist justices on a few important cases but I don't believe he will ever be another Kennedy. He still pretty reliably votes with the other originalists but when when he breaks ranks with them it becomes headline news. He has been a consistent Second Amendment supporter. It will be interesting to see how the vote goes on the NYC case but I don't think SCOTUS would have taken it unless the others were still confident in justice Roberts on that and they would know better than anyone.