SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Crime Rates in the USA
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Crime Rates in the USA Login/Join 
Essayons
Picture of SapperSteel
posted
PEW Research Center article is at this LINK

quote:
JANUARY 30, 2018
5 facts about crime in the U.S.
BY JOHN GRAMLICH

Donald Trump made crime fighting an important focus of his campaign for president, and he cited it again during his January 2017 inaugural address. As the administration takes steps to address violence in American communities, here are five facts about crime in the United States.

1 -- Violent crime in the U.S. has fallen sharply over the past quarter century. The two most commonly cited sources of crime statistics in the U.S. both show a substantial decline in the violent crime rate since it peaked in the early 1990s. One is an annual report by the FBI of serious crimes reported to police in approximately 18,000 jurisdictions around the country. The other is an annual survey of more than 90,000 households conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which asks Americans ages 12 and older whether they were victims of crime, regardless of whether they reported those crimes to the police.

Using the FBI numbers, the violent crime rate fell 48% between 1993 and 2016. Using the BJS data, the rate fell 74% during that span. (For both studies, 2016 is the most recent full year of data.) It’s important to note that the FBI reported a 7% increase in the violent crime rate between 2014 and 2016, including a 20% rise in the murder rate —from 4.4 to 5.3 murders per 100,000 residents. The BJS figures do not show an increase in the violent crime rate between 2014 and 2016, but they do not count murders. The BJS figures for 2016 also reflect a survey redesign, making it difficult to compare directly to prior years.


2 -- Property crime has declined significantly over the long term. Like the violent crime rate, the U.S. property crime rate today is far below its peak level. FBI data show that the rate fell 48% between 1993 and 2016, while BJS reports a decline of 66% during that span. Property crime includes offenses such as burglary, theft and motor vehicle theft, and it is generally far more common than violent crime. There was no documented increase in the property crime rate between 2014 and 2016.


3 -- Public perceptions about crime in the U.S. often don’t align with the data. Opinion surveys regularly find that Americans believe crime is up nationally, even when the data show it is down. In 17 Gallup surveys conducted since 1993, at least six-in-ten Americans said there was more crime in the U.S. compared with the year before, despite the generally downward trend in national violent and property crime rates during much of that period.

Pew Research Center surveys have found a similar pattern. In a survey in late 2016, 57% of registered voters said crime in the U.S. had gotten worse since 2008, even though BJS and FBI data show that violent and property crime rates declined by double-digit percentages during that span.

While perceptions of rising crime at the national level are common, fewer Americans tend to say crime is up when asked about the local level. In 20 Gallup surveys conducted since 1996, about half of Americans or fewer said crime is up in their area compared with the year before.


4 -- There are large geographic variations in crime rates. The FBI’s data show big differences from state to state and city to city. In 2016, there were more than 600 violent crimes per 100,000 residents in Alaska, Nevada, New Mexico and Tennessee. By contrast, Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont had rates below 200 violent crimes per 100,000 residents. And while Chicago has drawn widespread attention for its soaring murder total in recent years, its murder rate in 2016 – 28 murders and non-negligent manslaughters per 100,000 residents – was less than half of the rate in St. Louis (60 per 100,000) and far below the rate of Baltimore (51 per 100,000). The FBI notes that various factors might influence a particular area’s crime rate, including its population density and economic conditions.


5 -- Most crimes are not reported to police, and most reported crimes are not solved. In its annual survey, BJS asks victims of crime whether they reported that crime to police. In 2016, only 42% of the violent crime tracked by BJS was reported to police. And in the much more common category of property crime, only about a third (36%) was reported. There are a variety of reasons crime might not be reported, including a feeling that police “would not or could not do anything to help” or that the crime is “a personal issue or too trivial to report,” according to BJS.

Most of the crimes that are reported to police, meanwhile, are not solved, at least using an FBI measure known as the “clearance rate.” That’s the share of cases each year that are closed, or “cleared,” through the arrest, charging and referral of a suspect for prosecution. In 2016, police nationwide cleared 46% of violent crimes that were reported to them. For property crimes, the national clearance rate was 18%.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published Feb. 21, 2017.


Thanks,

Sap
 
Posts: 3452 | Location: Arimo, Idaho | Registered: February 03, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Astoundingly low clearance rates on homicides!

See Chicago

heyjackass.com


No quarter
.308/.223
 
Posts: 2283 | Location: Central Florida.  | Registered: March 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for posting this article.
Perhaps the media's seeming fixation on that-which-boosts-ratings is at least partly responsible for the public perception the violent crime is up.

Silent
 
Posts: 1067 | Registered: February 02, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
I'll agree with the article's premise that violent crime is down over the past 25 years.

But there are a few things to keep in mind, when examining annual crime statistics...

1) The definitions can change. There have been changes and tweaks to the definitions of various offenses over the years. For example, the FBI recently changed its definition of "rape", for purposes of these annual crime stats, meaning a rape in 2018 isn't necessarily the same as a rape in 1990. So it isn't always an apples-to-apples comparison.

2) Statistics can be manipulated, to make cities look better. A number of jurisdictions are under immense pressure to "improve" their stats. So an aggravated assault that would normally be reported in these stats compilations gets downgraded and reported as a 2nd degree battery, to keep it off the numbers. Or a robbery is recorded as a theft. Etc.

3) The story can change, depending on what time period you examine. For example, here's a chart with the violent crime rate since 1960:


The article talks about "the last quarter century". That's 1991-2016. So compared to the "bad old days" 25 years prior, at the height of the crack epidimic and massive gang violence wave in the early 90s, violent crime rates are definitely significantly down.

But had they wanted to, the article could have just as easily been: "Violent Crime Rate Doubles in Last Half-Century" (1966-2016).

Or even: "Violent Crime Rate Remains Stable In Last 5 Years" (2011-2016).

All depends on what they want to numbers to say. Wink
 
Posts: 33699 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because you can,
doesn't mean you should
posted Hide Post
I suspect they numbers are tweaked to the benefit of whoever is publishing them but the information available compared to before the 90's makes the perception worse than reality.


___________________________
Avoid buying ChiCom/CCP products whenever possible.
 
Posts: 10119 | Location: NE GA | Registered: August 22, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
The numbers are cooked.

My old dept. manipulated the stats on a regular basis.

Part 1 crimes were reclassified as different crimes altogether.

The BS shoveled to the city council was patently false.

For instance, stats delivered today for part one crimes will be compared to last years (annual) stats-showing that crime is down, or it will be compared against the same day this time last year or the year before that....always looking for a smaller number to compare it to.

Crimes that occurred on the local college campus were reclassified to keep stats down, or the nearby non-campus address was used to move the actual crime from the campus to across the street.

If its happening in that little ole NC town; you can rest assured it's happening EVERYWHERE as politics plays it's part in corruption.

The FBI gets their numbers from departments nationwide and they self report.

The numbers are skewed.



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11649 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I don't think cooking statistics is anything new.

My grandfather worked in the underground mines for 42 years. In the early part of the 20th Century (pre-union), the mine had a perfect safety record with no fatalities "in the mine". Of course, any miner that had been smashed to paste by some 100 ton slab of ore would be transported to the local hospital where he later died. Uh huh.
 
Posts: 9164 | Location: The Red part of Minnesota | Registered: October 06, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Too old to run,
too mean to quit!
posted Hide Post
quote:
2) Statistics can be manipulated, to make cities look better. A number of jurisdictions are under immense pressure to "improve" their stats. So an aggravated assault that would normally be reported in these stats compilations gets downgraded and reported as a 2nd degree battery, to keep it off the numbers. Or a robbery is recorded as a theft. Etc.


This! I distinctly remember from years ago that various police departments were "fudging" the data to make their "crime fighting" efforts look a lot more productive than were the case.

Old statistics instructor of mine in college often quoted, "Figures do not lie, but liars can figure"!


Elk

There has never been an occasion where a people gave up their weapons in the interest of peace that didn't end in their massacre. (Louis L'Amour)

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. "
-Thomas Jefferson

"America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." Alexis de Tocqueville

FBHO!!!



The Idaho Elk Hunter
 
Posts: 25656 | Location: Virginia | Registered: December 16, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
I'd like to see that chart overlaid on population trends.



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 12933 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Georgeair:
I'd like to see that chart overlaid on population trends.


It shouldn't affect it. Keep in mind, the FBI UCR stats and that chart are both violent crime rate per 100,000 population, not per total population.

In 2016, approximately 386 people out of 100,000 were victims of violent crime in the US. But there were a total of 1,248,185 violent crimes altogether in 2016.

So total population increases/decreases don't matter. Hypothetically, if the total US population doubles next year, the total number of violent crimes would also roughly double next year, without some other change in the violent crime rate due to other factors beyond population increase. Therefore, the UCR's crime rate per 100k won't change.

To think of it another way, if the population doubled with no other changes affecting crime likelihood, there'd be twice as many criminals, but also twice as many potential victims, so your overall chances of being a victim of crime wouldn't change.
 
Posts: 33699 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Crime Rates in the USA

© SIGforum 2025