quote:Originally posted by JALLEN:quote:Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
I would also recommend the annual letters of Warren Buffet to the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, particularly this year's letter at page 21-24 where he discusses active vs passive investing. Spoiler alert - 99.99% of all investors (including many of the highest paid hedge fund managers) would do better over the long run with a low cost index fund than any active strategy.
Link to Buffet's letters
This is very interesting. I've been following Buffett, and Graham, for decades. We went to school on the same book, Securities Analysis by Ben Graham. Buffett took the course from Graham himself, the only A+ student Graham had, IIRC. I did less well.
Oddly, Buffett is one of the very few active investors who has done better in the long run than passive investing, a lot better. Since 1965, the S&P has compounded at 9.7%, including dividends. Berkshire Hathaway, which Buffett took control of in 1965, has a compounded annual increase of 19.8%, or 20.8%, depending on whether you look at per share book value or change in market value.
When Buffett took control, shares of Berkshire were trading at around $10. Had you bought $10,000 of it (1,000 shares) and kept them since, those would be worth $263,600,000 as of the close today.
One factoid is that investors in BRK have paid Buffett no fees for investment management. He drew a salary of $50,000 a year for decades, and now is paid $100,000 per year. He receives some security help and other amounts, maybe $400k total.
quote:Originally posted by msfzoe:
vfinx and vbinx.
Two Vanguard mutual funds that have done well over time.
After your initial investment, commit a fixed amount to contribute on a monthly basis.
Sit back and watch your investment grow.
Avoid individual stocks.
quote:Originally posted by 2tonicP220:
Bogleheads
John Bogle should receive the Medal of Freedom. Follow this mans advice, or suffer the consequences - I'm dead serious. Keep it simple, do it yourself, never pay a % under management fee, invest in very low cost funds (Vanguard all the way for me). Really, all you need are three funds, maybe two. Asset allocation has a lot of variables, and once you start asking questions, folks can better guide you.
This fella is fantastic:
http://jlcollinsnh.com/
As is www.mrmoneymustache.com
Proof in the pudding is I retired at 46, and never had a high paying job. What I did however was always stay invested, never sold in the panics (actually quadrupled my investments), always did it myself, lived well but frugally/well under my means, and worked on staying healthy and fit. $$$, especially F-you kinda money gives you great freedom, and a great feeling to boot.
IMO, I would not start out with individual securities, rather very low cost mutual funds. Good luck.
quote:Originally posted by Skins2881:
I have a degree in finance and was a financial planner for five years following college, and I have zero interest in investing in individual stocks.
Rather go to Vegas with jhe888. 1/2 budget on hookers and blow the rest on roulette. I am sure I'd fair better than individual stocks.
Good luck, you'll need it.
PS I also came in second overall in the country in a multi-campus investing simulation. Still wouldn't do it.
quote:Originally posted by Aeteocles:
Are you taking advantage of all your tax advantaged investment opportunities like your 401k and IRA?