Well keep them locked, you never know when a home invasion is coming.

https://www.kusi.com/san-diego...-new-gun-safety-law/

I think Heller would invalidate that law.
We shall see.

Bruce

“Wendy Wheatcroft, founder of San Diegans for Gun Violence Prevention, framed the ordinance as a way to keep military veterans, first responders and law enforcement officers from committing suicide in addition to keeping guns away from children. As of June 19, 97 police officers and 46 firefighters have killed themselves in the U.S. since the beginning of this year, according to Wheatcroft.”

What the hell kind of rationale is this? Doesn’t she realize that as adults that own the guns, removing the safety’s wouldn’t apply if they wanted to off themselves? Typical lying leftist bullshit.

What the hell kind of rationale is this?
The best an idiot commie shitstain could come up with?

Heller already explicitly held that a trigger lock requirement is unconstitutional, along with any other requirement to keep a gun in an inoperable condition. The reason is that such requirements make it impossible for citizens to use their weapons for the "core lawful purpose of self-defense."

I would think a locked storage requirement would fall squarely under such reasoning and be struck down, but with liberal hacks in black, you just never know.

quote:

Originally posted by SeaCliff:

https://www.kusi.com/san-diego...-new-gun-safety-law/

I made it all the way to the fifth sentence in the linked article before I encountered the words "common sense."

I stopped reading at that point.

I guess those are my trigger words.

quote:

Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
Heller already explicitly held that a trigger lock requirement is unconstitutional, along with any other requirement to keep a gun in an inoperable condition. The reason is that such requirements make it impossible for citizens to use their weapons for the "core lawful purpose of self-defense."

I would think a locked storage requirement would fall squarely under such reasoning and be struck down, but with liberal hacks in black, you just never know.

When you feel as if the Constitution and SCOTUS rulings don’t apply to you, you know no bounds.

Just think of this, San Diego is the best (political) part of California.

Because taking 3 seconds to unlock a gun before you stick it in your mouth and kill yourself is just too much of a burden. God these people are absolute numb skulls.

This was passed on July 15th and on July 16th ...

https://www.10news.com/news/lo...vasion-in-san-carlos

SPSHOOTER

Camel's nose. They know these laws are unenforceable because the only way to know if someone's guns are unsecured is to physically inspect them. It's only a matter of time before some commie city, county, or state passes a law giving authorities access to any home with a registered firearm. Hopefully it won't survive the subsequent court challenges but it will happen.

quote:

Originally posted by 220-9er:
Just think of this, San Diego is the best (political) part of California.

Fresno took that mantle nearly 20-years ago.
San Diego has been slipping blue as conservatives who would retire in SD, are moving out of state. Same issue on the central coast: Santa Barbara, San Luis and Monterey Counties all used to be solidly purple, if not red, sadly the exodus has allowed the leftists to fill the vacuum.

That new law in SD sounds just like what has been status quo here in MA for many moons.

Oh and let them enforce it amongst their own. LEO's are not exempt. Since they are on the councils list of suicidals.

All these stupid liberal cities.....Just one more gun law, that'll make everything right.

With respect to minors gaining access:

In North Carolina, you don't have to lock it when on the nightstand for the evening, and you're not responsible if a minor breaks in and steals your unlocked gun.

§ 14-315.1. Storage of firearms to protect minors.

(a) Any person who resides in the same premises as a minor, owns or possesses a firearm, and stores or leaves the firearm (i) in a condition that the firearm can be discharged and (ii) in a manner that the person knew or should have known that an unsupervised minor would be able to gain access to the firearm, is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor if a minor gains access to the firearm without the lawful permission of the minor's parents or a person having charge of the minor . . .

(b) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a person from carrying a firearm on his or her body, or placed in such close proximity that it can be used as easily and quickly as if carried on the body.

(c) This section shall not apply if the minor obtained the firearm as a result of an unlawful entry by any person.

Andrew C the governor, just signed a similar law here in New York.
Albany Times Union