SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Gen Z and millennial women are waking up to the lies feminists fed them
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Gen Z and millennial women are waking up to the lies feminists fed them Login/Join 
Member!
posted Hide Post
The other side of the feminist problem that affects males negatively is that all the single and divorced mothers are raising little boys into older boys as they don't know how to raise men. They turn them into caricatures of what they think men should be like, which is girls with penises. Since there is so much legal bias against fathers raising the kids, there is an unbalanced amount of feminine men being brought up.
 
Posts: 4370 | Location: Boise, ID USA | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Dances with Wiener Dogs
Picture of XinTX
posted Hide Post
quote:
Persling has been slammed with hateful comments, particularly from men, who insist she’s been selfish. She’s a product of her choices, they say, and, well, too bad.

It’s not that simple.


Well yes, it is that simple. The entire "We don't need no man" doesn't even pass the life logic test. Look at how many things around are built by men. Heck, if her car breaks down/runs out of gas/has a flat who shows up? A wrecker, driven and operated by a man. All these "I don't need no man" types are quick to call for a man to help when they run into a problem. Not to mention, she's here today because there was a man involved.


_______________________
“The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” Ayn Rand

“If we relinquish our rights because of fear, what is it exactly, then, we are fighting for?” Sen. Rand Paul
 
Posts: 8379 | Registered: July 21, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
Frankly, I’ll call anyone who can help me *if* I can’t do it myself. Doesn’t need to be a dude. I know women who have no man, nor do they want one. Too much trouble and not worth the hassle. And they do fine (sound familiar?).

Btw, plenty of women have kids in their 40’s. I did. No ivf, etc. It really does depend on one’s individual clock, but if you look at the stats, the number of folks having kids in their 40’s is getting more and more common. I think it’s for a variety of reasons, including not settling for the the first swinging Dick that walks by, but probably more to do with being able to afford a child and home these days.

That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter, for example. But I do think she can calculate any equation, do any work that doesn’t require physical strength/brawn.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5569 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter, for example...

That's fact of life. "Sexist" is a bullshit made up term by the "feminazi".


Q






 
Posts: 28200 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter, for example...

That's fact of life. "Sexist" is a bullshit made up term by the "feminazi".


The term was coined around then, yup, but I think the meaning has been around a lot longer.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5569 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
Democrats have nurtured the feminist movement by using the federal govt to replace the male spouse

remember obama's "Life of Julia" ?

Under President Obama, Julia enrolls in a Head Start program at age three, wearing a pinafore, ribbons, and Mary Janes.

At eighteen, in a varsity shirt, blue jeans, and high-tops, she gets a Pell grant. At twenty-five, her hair has changed color—from blue to orange—and, while working as a Web designer, she’s paying back her student loans, and her health insurance covers preventive care and the cost of birth control.

She has her first baby at thirty-one, and, at forty-two, by which point she has let her hair go back to its natural blue, she qualifies for a loan from the Small Business Administration.

She begins receiving Medicare at sixty-five, and, two years later, Social Security is why she isn’t worried about how to pay for her retirement: “This allows her to volunteer at a community garden.”

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

BTW I have two grown daughters who are both very successful and didn't buy into the feminist victimology
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PowerSurge
posted Hide Post
It’s time to be honest and call feminists what they really are: Female chauvinists


———————————————
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1
 
Posts: 4049 | Location: Northeast Georgia | Registered: November 18, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter, for example...

That's fact of life. "Sexist" is a bullshit made up term by the "feminazi".



And look how she can't even apply the term correctly. What she's describing is equality. Sexism is when someone is equally qualified but is viewed negatively and dismissed because of their sex. For example, if a man works in a daycare and mothers won't send their children there because they prefer putting their children in a daycare staffed by women, that's sexism.


Also, women having children in their 40s is possible but isn't optimal. It's well documented that by age 30 women have lost 90% of their eggs and by age 40 women have less than 5% of their eggs left. The remaining eggs are old and are more likely to have issues that put the baby and the mother at risk. Once again, feminism has brainwashed young women into prioritizing a degree and a career before a family. The problem is that while they're getting both their biological clock is ticking. Most men and women in their 20s are still figuring life out. Getting a degree, post graduate degree, internships, entry level positions, dating, traveling, etc. It isn't until their 30s where they have figured out their path to pursue it and start accumulating assets.


As someone who dates women in the 25-35 age group I know first hand how much attention attractive women are getting. On a dating app it's not uncommon for an attractive woman in that age bracket to get over 50 matches a day. Most of these women have at least 1,000 followers per social media platform and when they post something they get at least a 100 likes, mostly by men. If you don't think this is affecting their selection/mating process I don't know what to tell you. What I can tell you is that it has nothing to do with finances. There's plenty of opportunities for women to marry a man who can either take on the full financial load or between both their incomes could provide a comfortable lifestyle. The bottom line is that the younger women are flooded with men offering them their world and if they want a partner 1 of 2 things will happen: they find the "perfect guy" and marry him or as they lose their physical attractiveness, they lose men's interest and they settle for whoever's left.


If you think I don't know what I'm talking about here's some videos that shed some light on the topic:


New Tinder user swipe data shows women only want...the top 1% of men

I swiped on tinder 143,489 times. Here’s what happened


On the second video here's the breakdown:


Over a 6 year period the guy swiped 143,489 times. 33,702 times the guy swiped right (wanted to match). He matched with 1122 women. Chatted with 229 of them which led to 12 dates, no casual sex and 1 relationship.

There's no counter study because everyone knows if a woman swiped 143k+ times and went down the flow chart she'd have well over 6 figures of casual sex / relationships if she were so inclined.
 
Posts: 843 | Location: Southern NH | Registered: October 11, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eye on the
Silver Lining
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hildur:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter, for example...

That's fact of life. "Sexist" is a bullshit made up term by the "feminazi".



And look how she can't even apply the term correctly. What she's describing is equality. Sexism is when someone is equally qualified but is viewed negatively and dismissed because of their sex. For example, if a man works in a daycare and mothers won't send their children there because they prefer putting their children in a daycare staffed by women, that's sexism.


Also, women having children in their 40s is possible but isn't optimal. It's well documented that by age 30 women have lost 90% of their eggs and by age 40 women have less than 5% of their eggs left. The remaining eggs are old and are more likely to have issues that put the baby and the mother at risk. Once again, feminism has brainwashed young women into prioritizing a degree and a career before a family. The problem is that while they're getting both their biological clock is ticking. Most men and women in their 20s are still figuring life out. Getting a degree, post graduate degree, internships, entry level positions, dating, traveling, etc. It isn't until their 30s where they have figured out their path to pursue it and start accumulating assets.


As someone who dates women in the 25-35 age group I know first hand how much attention attractive women are getting. On a dating app it's not uncommon for an attractive woman in that age bracket to get over 50 matches a day. Most of these women have at least 1,000 followers per social media platform and when they post something they get at least a 100 likes, mostly by men. If you don't think this is affecting their selection/mating process I don't know what to tell you. What I can tell you is that it has nothing to do with finances. There's plenty of opportunities for women to marry a man who can either take on the full financial load or between both their incomes could provide a comfortable lifestyle. The bottom line is that the younger women are flooded with men offering them their world and if they want a partner 1 of 2 things will happen: they find the "perfect guy" and marry him or as they lose their physical attractiveness, they lose men's interest and they settle for whoever's left.


If you think I don't know what I'm talking about here's some videos that shed some light on the topic:


New Tinder user swipe data shows women only want...the top 1% of men

I swiped on tinder 143,489 times. Here’s what happened


On the second video here's the breakdown:


Over a 6 year period the guy swiped 143,489 times. 33,702 times the guy swiped right (wanted to match). He matched with 1122 women. Chatted with 229 of them which led to 12 dates, no casual sex and 1 relationship.

There's no counter study because everyone knows if a woman swiped 143k+ times and went down the flow chart she'd have well over 6 figures of casual sex / relationships if she were so inclined.


Look up the definition of the word, Hildur. Per the registry date, you’ve been here 3 years, tops. I’ve been here almost 20? I’ve had this conversation here before. Btw, Tinder isn’t a metric I use, though, perhaps the vast majority of the population does. It’s old and tired. Like your attitude. Sad.


__________________________

"Trust, but verify."
 
Posts: 5569 | Registered: October 24, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:


Look up the definition of the word, Hildur. Per the registry date, you’ve been here 3 years, tops. I’ve been here almost 20? I’ve had this conversation here before. Btw, Tinder isn’t a metric I use, though, perhaps the vast majority of the population does. It’s old and tired. Like your attitude. Sad.



Sexist - prejudice or discrimination based on sex


What you posted:

quote:
Originally posted by irreverent:
That all being said, I’m quick to agree that I’m sexist. I don’t think a woman should be a firefighter unless she cam physically handle the work as well as the average male firefighter...



You admitted to being a sexist yet the scenario you described right after calling yourself one is a position promoting EQUALITY. Are you not able to tell the difference or are you of the mindset that once you think you're right, you're right even when your own words contradict your need to be right?


I don't see how my length of membership with this forum applies to your argument. All it tells me is that you can't add because 2023-2005 isn't almost 20. It's 18.


I'm sure you don't use Tinder as a metric because I don't think you've been dating women in the 25 - 35 age group. That's where I have a lot more experience than you and you have none (unless you want to share your experiences trying to date attractive straight women in that group as a 40+ year old woman).


I'm sure you have your idea of what dating should be like based on your perspective as a woman. You might have even given out a bunch of dating advice to men throughout your life. Here's the bottom line: If a man wants advice on how to date in that group is he going to ask the fisherman who's caught those fish or the fish that would have qualified 5+ years ago? Do you know how much the dynamics have changed in the last 5, 10, 15 years? Were you actively trying to get women in that bracket at any point in those intervals? My point exactly.


The fact of the matter is that unless you're a man trying to date you don't have a clue what it's like. This isn't the 80s/90s. The younger generation uses technology in every facet of their life. Instagram is the number one dating application that isn't even being marketed as one. You think the Tinder mentality doesn't carry over to Bumble, Plenty of Fish, Hinge, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.? You don't think the constant barrage of male attention women receive via technology doesn't affect their perception when interacting with men in person? Like I said, unless you're a man dealing with this first hand and has experienced what it's like then you have nothing of substance to add. All you have are your opinions which are irrelevant because you haven't put them to the test.
 
Posts: 843 | Location: Southern NH | Registered: October 11, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Gen Z and millennial women are waking up to the lies feminists fed them

© SIGforum 2024