So the female cop who totally makes sense from the standpoint of a grand conspiracy among agencies and the clown show of ‘bomb’ ’discovery’ at the DNC and the resulting action against J6ers to distract any real investigation, and the bomb ‘investigation’ which produced nothing but edited videos and clown shoes misdirection is out the window, and a vulnerable (via his father) useful idiot is ‘encouraged’ to take the fall so that nothing about the grand conspiracy comes to light? But only after Trump is back in office, and the DOJ/FBI are no longer under Uniparty control.

Sounds legit.

quote:

Originally posted by mrvmax:

quote:

Originally posted by Fly-Sig:

quote:

Originally posted by Rey HRH:

Wasn’t there a thread here tying the J6 bomber to a female Capitol cop who’s now in the CIA?

Yup, it was earlier in this thread iirc. I would be really interested in what those researchers think about how their analysis fits this guy. I don't doubt their original work was honest even though the conclusion was apparently wrong. Does this suspect currently walk in a way consistent with their analysis?

I was thinking about how they earlier picked the female due to the walk analysis. Unless my memory is really bad (well, actually it is..) I think it is rare to have a female bomb maker, most are males. Females may use bombs but they are usually made by males.

It wasn't a bomb. That was clear from the first photos.

It was an excuse to initiate other events on J6.

The Wall Street Journal published an informative article about the FBI’s investigation today. I may not post it in its entirety, but some key points and a couple of (hopefully fair use) quotations:

“[Dan] Bongino learned something far different after becoming the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s No. 2 official this year: Investigators weren’t hiding evidence—they just didn’t realize they had it”:
I.e., the FBI wasn’t concealing the evidence because it was an “inside job” as he alleged earlier.

According to the article, early on the Bureau had extensive cell phone records relating to the incident, but no one knew how to read it, and only after several years did a “tech-savvy” LEO write a program to make that possible. That in turn led to the identification of the perpetrator.

Among earlier investigative efforts the FBI checked pipe purchases at Home Depot stores across the country, examined Google searches for people looking for information about how to make pipe bombs and for directions to the two locations where the bombs were planted, investigated who paid for parking and who rented homes via Airbnb or Vrbo in the areas, and even conducted an ultimately fruitless undercover investigation based on a witness’ claim to have heard a woman talking about pipe bombs.

Once the cell phone data identified a suspect, the investigation looked at bank and credit card information to link him to purchases of pipes and other components of the bombs. And although they did not explode (which is common with such devices made by amateurs), they were clearly intended to be bombs.
“[T]he FBI deemed the devices placed at the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican national committees viable ….”

The suspect ultimately confessed to placing the devices.

LINK

And because I can easily predict what some responses will be I will leave it at this:
“A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.”
— Simon & Garfunkel: “The Boxer.”

None of this explains why the FBI tampered with the original security cam footage of the bomber to disguise his/her gait or stride. Or why they couldn't hire a private tech pro to write the program that eventually unraveled the cell tower data. Or why the cops who were in the area were so non-chalant once alerted to the presence of pipe bombs nearby. And on and on.

^^^^^^^^

quote:

None of this explains why the FBI tampered with the original security cam footage of the bomber to disguise his/her gait or stride.

Do you have evidence of that?

Have a read.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/...e-bomb-investigation

quote:

the Bureau had extensive cell phone records relating to the incident, but no one knew how to read it, and only after several years did a “tech-savvy” LEO write a program to make that possible.

Say what? They certainly had no issue using that data to track down hundreds if not thousands of those nearby on the 6th to all corners of our country. But they had no idea how to use it for the pipe bomber?

Right.

quote:

Originally posted by Rick Lee:
Have a read.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/...e-bomb-investigation

A long article. I scanned it twice and found no evidence for your assertion that “the FBI tampered with the original security cam footage of the bomber.”

This was the link I meant to post.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/...e-bomber-sources-say

We were discussing this on another forum. Unfortunately, this link now goes to a new story and the old one has been deleted since the arrest of Cole. But the original article stated an independent source had ID'd a female Capital Police Officer as the pipe bomber. In reviewing the footage, they were able to determine the FBI had changed the frames per second in a way that disguised the perp's gait before they released the footage to the public. Once the independent source had found a name, and the woman just happened to live in the townhouse in Alexandria, VA NEXTDOOR to the house the FBI was watching, he dug into her past. Turns out she had broken her tibia in a soccer or field hockey (I forget which) game in college, leading to the limp very noticeable in the footage. Anyway, it's probably gonna be buried now, but that original article was very compelling.

quote:

A long article. I scanned it twice and found no evidence for your assertion that “the FBI tampered with the original security cam footage of the bomber.”

Try this:
https://www.theblaze.com/colum...ence-withholds-video