SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Will the "old" engines return?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Will the "old" engines return? Login/Join 
Res ipsa loquitur
Picture of BB61
posted Hide Post
My 2024 GMC Sierra HD is naturally aspirated, no engine shutoff, pushrod, cast-iron block engine. Granted, it’s a HD truck and it still has tech but it’s much simpler than their 6.2 engine in their light duty trucks and the Duramax with all Def the add- ons. If they ditched Def, it would bring diesel reliability back that’s for sure.


__________________________

 
Posts: 12978 | Registered: October 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
I intentionally bought an older diesel truck to avoid DEF and the other emissions garbage that cost a fortune to repair when it fails.



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 30800 | Location: Norris Lake, TN | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I don't see anywhere how Trump has actually killed the current emissions standards for things like soot and the fuel economy standards that drive what you can buy. Where and how did that happen? Till then you will need your DEF etc. etc.


“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
 
Posts: 11826 | Registered: October 14, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
My work truck is a 1500 with the turbo 4. It has more than enough pep but it only gets 15 mpg. I suspect a NA V8 would do the same or better mpg and not be under the same stress.
Getting rid of most of the diesel emissions BS across the board would be a godsend to commercial users. Talking with diesel users, problems with emissions control failing is a common and expensive theme.


“That’s what.” - She
 
Posts: 591 | Location: Kentucky | Registered: June 06, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Trophy Husband
Picture of C L Wilkins
posted Hide Post
Engine Stop Eliminator

This is for a Honda Ridgeline. There are number of products out there.

CW
 
Posts: 3268 | Location: Texas | Registered: June 29, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
Thankfully as of last Thursday the EPA "emission credits" for start-stop were eliminated so I imagine new models will no longer have it. The problem with it was that by default the system had to be active and even though you could turn it off, once the car was shut off it defaults back to on again. And when it's off there's a light that stays illuminated on the display "reminding you that you turned off". There are plug-ins that you can buy that change the default to it being off so you don't have to press the off button every time you start but they don't eliminate the annoying dash light. On my Ridgeline the orange light's pretty bright, on my Civic it's so small I don't even notice it.

Someone with a newer Subaru said in the menu there was a display that logged how many times, for how long, and the gasoline saved, and over one year it saved like .6 gallons or less than $2.00.

It would be nice if dealerships were free to disable it on existing vehicles but I'm not sure the EPA ruling is saying that.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 8356 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just because something is legal to do doesn't mean it is the smart thing to do.
posted Hide Post
My wife asthma and since the DEF use has risen she doesn't have nearly the problem with traffic exhaust when we are in the car.
It has made a big improvement for her.
I'm willing to bet it has helped others also.


Integrity is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking.
 
Posts: 4638 | Location: Metamora MI | Registered: October 31, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
Some "stop-start"-equipped vehicles have a separate battery, often hidden (the Jeep Wrangler's, for example, is in the left front wheel well) to operate the starter. Be mindful of this when disabling S-S. They will eventually go dead and/or corrode into uselessness and cause further problems.





"The Almighty, He put some livin' things on this earth so a man can eat." - Festus Haggen, Gunsmoke
 
Posts: 31594 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by egregore:
Some "stop-start"-equipped vehicles have a separate battery, often hidden (the Jeep Wrangler's, for example, is in the left front wheel well) to operate the starter. Be mindful of this when disabling S-S. They will eventually go dead and/or corrode into uselessness and cause further problems.


The aux battery on my Mercedes [2015 C300] was on its way out when I traded it in. The dash gave a vague message about the battery. Checked the main & it was fine, but the auto-S/S quit working.
A bit of MB forum searching & the aux battery is in the dash somewhere.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 18525 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ridewv:
Thankfully as of last Thursday the EPA "emission credits" for start-stop were eliminated so I imagine new models will no longer have it. The problem with it was that by default the system had to be active and even though you could turn it off, once the car was shut off it defaults back to on again. And when it's off there's a light that stays illuminated on the display "reminding you that you turned off". There are plug-ins that you can buy that change the default to it being off so you don't have to press the off button every time you start but they don't eliminate the annoying dash light. On my Ridgeline the orange light's pretty bright, on my Civic it's so small I don't even notice it.

Someone with a newer Subaru said in the menu there was a display that logged how many times, for how long, and the gasoline saved, and over one year it saved like .6 gallons or less than $2.00.

It would be nice if dealerships were free to disable it on existing vehicles but I'm not sure the EPA ruling is saying that.


When I had my F150, i tracked it over a few months, with and without using S/S, no significant change, over the same commuting route & largely similar conditions.
In the TX summer, it would only shut off for a few seconds before turning back on due to A/C cooling demands.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 18525 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by P250UA5:

When I had my F150, i tracked it over a few months, with and without using S/S, no significant change, over the same commuting route & largely similar conditions.
In the TX summer, it would only shut off for a few seconds before turning back on due to A/C cooling demands.



Yeah it can't let the vehicle stay off for long in very cold or very hot weather. Under most scenarios I think stop-start saves very little to nil while adding cost and complexity. Maybe for those who regularly commute through miles of stop and go traffic it could offer some benefit.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 8356 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of P250UA5
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ridewv:
quote:
Originally posted by P250UA5:

When I had my F150, i tracked it over a few months, with and without using S/S, no significant change, over the same commuting route & largely similar conditions.
In the TX summer, it would only shut off for a few seconds before turning back on due to A/C cooling demands.



Yeah it can't let the vehicle stay off for long in very cold or very hot weather. Under most scenarios I think stop-start saves very little to nil while adding cost and complexity. Maybe for those who regularly commute through miles of stop and go traffic it could offer some benefit.


Maybe, but frequently, you're engaging the starter almost immediately after it turns off.




The Enemy's gate is down.
 
Posts: 18525 | Location: Spring, TX | Registered: July 11, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I have not yet begun
to procrastinate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Under most scenarios I think stop-start saves very little to nil while adding cost and complexity.

Also adding wear on the starter and battery.


--------
After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box.
 
Posts: 4439 | Location: Central AZ | Registered: October 26, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
Auto Start/Stop was disabled immediately upon purchase of the vehicle.
Cost me $100 for a nice plug and play harness that plugged into one of the BCM modules in my drivers side C pillar. Took all of 2 minutes to pop the panel off and plug in.

I have since learned that one did not really need to do that but just plug in a small night light to the AC power outlet on the back of the center console will disable the Start/Stop as it does not function when something is plugged in the AC outlet.
Also the AC outlet does not function with the engine off so no need to worry about draining the battery.
Would have been nice to know prior to spending $100.


————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 26780 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 4MUL8R
posted Hide Post
I believe that the industry will settle on similar features for gasoline engines depending on vehicle size and weight and towing capability

1. Port Fuel Injection AND Direct Fuel Injection. The "dual injection" engines have superb emissions and driveability, and also prevent intake valve deposits
2. 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder turbocharged engines for sedans, small SUVs, midsize trucks, and half-ton trucks
3. 8-cylinder "big" engines (6.2L to 7.3L) for higher towing 1/2 ton and above

Elimination of active fuel management (cylinder deactivation). Elimination of auto-start-stop.

There is much technical "inertia" with gasoline engines. GDI (direct injection) is really good for power, but adds so much complexity. But, with all the GDI already figured out, and so many engineers put out to pasture for EV emphasis the past few years, I think we are stuck with GDI engines. We didn't need them. But, emissions and all that forced us to redesign.

The real question is the pendulum swing that will happen in 2028. If freedom-loving people do not elect freedom-loving representatives, we will be back to EV mandates, tax credits, etc. So, I think there will be minimal efforts by the OEMs to do anything since they have already lost billions moving to EV, and now having to stop all that.


-------
Trying to simplify my life...
 
Posts: 6114 | Location: Commonwealth of Virginia | Registered: January 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
https://www.caranddriver.com/n...LlKBx4YwZqLCVLnLZe7g

quote:
EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop- Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say
We contacted automakers for their take on this hot-button issue (no pun intended) and got some surprising responses.

By Joey CapparellaPublished: Feb 13, 2026

The Trump administration says it's going to eliminate stop-start technology requirements for cars, with EPA chief Lee Zeldin calling the technology "absurd."
Car and Driver wonders how a change in policy on this scale would actually work, considering most of the nation's newer vehicles already have the tech onboard.
Here's what six major automakers said when we reached out.
As part of a sweeping policy change, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says that it's "eliminating" engine stop-start systems from American roads. How will this regulatory change play out in our vehicles, given that millions of cars are already in operation with this system in place? Only time will tell, but we wanted to know what the automakers have to say about this recent decision. So we asked.

Hyundai's statement was the most specific we received, pointing out that the EPA's rule changes simply remove incentives for automakers to use this technology, rather than banning it: "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use. Hyundai continues to comply with all applicable emissions regulations and regularly evaluates vehicle technologies based on customer feedback, regulatory requirements, and overall efficiency. At this time, we will continue to assess future developments as regulations evolve."

Ford's statement was less specific about how these policy changes could affect its vehicles but appears clearly in support of the change: "We appreciate the work of President Trump and Administrator Zeldin to address the imbalance between current emissions standards and customer choice. Ford has consistently advocated for a single, stable national standard that aligns with customer choice, the market, societal benefit, and American job growth."

Many others did not have anything to share about this issue. "We can't comment on that right now. Still too new to know anything about it," said a Subaru spokesperson. General Motors' response was similar, saying, "We don't have anything to share at this time."

Toyota, Nissan, and Honda all deferred to a statement made by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a collective made up of 42 automakers that has previously petitioned President Trump about EV policy changes. Honda said; "We do not have anything to share at this time. Please reach out to AFAI if you have additional questions."

John Bozzella, president and CEO, Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said:

"Today’s action is consistent with EPA's earlier announcement that it intended to repeal the endangerment finding and correct some of the unachievable emissions regulations enacted under the previous administration. I've said it before: Automotive emissions regulations finalized in the previous administration are extremely challenging for automakers to achieve given the current marketplace demand for EVs. The auto industry in America remains focused on preserving vehicle choice for consumers, keeping the industry competitive, and staying on a long-term path of emissions reductions and cleaner vehicles."

This variety of responses proves that it's too early to make sweeping judgments about the effects that this policy change will have on the cars we drive. But we will keep an eye out for any resulting modifications that these automakers will make—or not make—to their U.S.-market vehicles in the future, in response to this current EPA administration's fight against stop-start technology.





————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 26780 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
Another added complexity, performance, and maintenance issue that is coming is beginning next year the EPA Tier 4 emissions start phasing in and will result in GPF (gasoline particulate filters) essentially the DPF that diesels were required to use to meet diesel Tier 4. Some GDI cars are already having to use GPF.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 8356 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thankfully my wife's 2021 Subaru Forester has a button to turn off the "Auto Stop Start" (ASS). I use that button in town, because if not, it often turns off the engine just as I want to merge into a break in traffic. So in my mind, ASS is more of a safety hazard than emissions.

My 2009 GMC Z71 1500 has a 5.3L V8, and I average 15 mpg commuting to work, mostly urban driving. So, a Turbo-4 in a GM 1500 doesn't seem to have that much benefit, performance / mileage-wise. I did add an AFM delete to it immediately after I bought it.
 
Posts: 705 | Location: Middle Alabama | Registered: February 27, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
thin skin can't win
Picture of Georgeair
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KMitch200:
Also adding wear on the starter and battery.

Sidebar - some cars now with mild-hybrid and similar systems don't have a traditional starter. Instead, the inline generator that deploys/captures energy also spins up the engine to start it. Think of it as the transmission turning the engine over.

We've got a 2024 Merc SUV that does this, and the sound of it starting is very muted, almost like it's just suddenly "on". Weird, a cool bit of kit, and no doubt VERY expensive to repair once parts of that start to bite the dust.....



You only have integrity once. - imprezaguy02

 
Posts: 13532 | Location: Madison, MS | Registered: December 10, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
Another major beef I have with S-S is that on some vehicles starter replacement is a tough job. Look up the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cylinder 4wd for an example.





"The Almighty, He put some livin' things on this earth so a man can eat." - Festus Haggen, Gunsmoke
 
Posts: 31594 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Will the "old" engines return?

© SIGforum 2026