SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Keynesian Myth of the WWII Economic recovery
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Keynesian Myth of the WWII Economic recovery Login/Join 
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted
This is a short, but very thoughtful, video.

 
Posts: 9155 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
Not so much buying it. WWII vastly stimulated the economy. We were pumping stuff out at a vastly higher rate than before the war. With all the able bodied men fighting overseas, anybody who could work, did.

Also, after the war, large amounts of the world were essential destroyed we were the only major power going into the war who came out intact. Because of that, American industry essential rebuilt most of the world, much of which was financed by the US Government under the Marshall Plan.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
Picture of SgtGold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Also, after the war, large amounts of the world were essential destroyed we were the only major power going into the war who came out intact. Because of that, American industry essential rebuilt most of the world, much of which was financed by the US Government under the Marshall Plan.


I agree. Without the post war economic boom the US economy would have slid back into recession. The rearming of W. Germany in the 50's was in part supported by the fact that our NATO allies needed someone to sell tneir output to.


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 7188 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
I tend to agree with you both that the war had an effect. WW2 was a short term stimulus that put people to work, but the lasting effect on the economy is what private industry did post-war to grow the economy.

As an example, some of plants that were building aluminum clad planes for the war converted their knowledge in aluminum to boat building and created long-term businesses around that industry.

The war's effect on the economy was much like a dose of novocaine, temporarily easing the pain of an injury, but the surgery and physical therapy occurred afterward. Had private companies not adapted post-war, then we would have slipped back into depression. I think this is what the professor is saying.



.
 
Posts: 9155 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Not so much buying it. WWII vastly stimulated the economy. We were pumping stuff out at a vastly higher rate than before the war. With all the able bodied men fighting overseas, anybody who could work, did.

Also, after the war, large amounts of the world were essential destroyed we were the only major power going into the war who came out intact. Because of that, American industry essential rebuilt most of the world, much of which was financed by the US Government under the Marshall Plan.


More than that, we adopted a doctrine that said the US would patrol the world seas, guaranteeing safe passage for other nations to trade with each other, free from the threat of piracy. This had a lot to do with world's emergence economically post WWII.



.
 
Posts: 9155 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
The Marshall Plan was a good idea, too.




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Info Guru
Picture of BamaJeepster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Not so much buying it. WWII vastly stimulated the economy. We were pumping stuff out at a vastly higher rate than before the war. With all the able bodied men fighting overseas, anybody who could work, did.


The US government was paying those soldiers and buying the goods. So, if that works, why not have the government pay millions of men and women to go camping in the Rockies - feed and clothe them and buy all of the output of Ford, GM and Chrysler?

If that fixed the economy, why not do that full time?



“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
- John Adams
 
Posts: 29408 | Location: In the red hinterlands of Deep Blue VA | Registered: June 29, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
Even if you talk to Kenesian economists, they don't call for continuous, never ending deficit based "pump priming". It's supposed to be a temporary thing to boost the economy when it's stalling out. In that way the spending on WWII was a good example of that. It got the economy going, and, combined with the pent up demand both domestically and around the world, set us up for a good 25 years of running prosperity (where the government could then run a surplus.)

quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Not so much buying it. WWII vastly stimulated the economy. We were pumping stuff out at a vastly higher rate than before the war. With all the able bodied men fighting overseas, anybody who could work, did.


The US government was paying those soldiers and buying the goods. So, if that works, why not have the government pay millions of men and women to go camping in the Rockies - feed and clothe them and buy all of the output of Ford, GM and Chrysler?

If that fixed the economy, why not do that full time?
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Info Guru
Picture of BamaJeepster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Even if you talk to Kenesian economists, they don't call for continuous, never ending deficit based "pump priming". It's supposed to be a temporary thing to boost the economy when it's stalling out. In that way the spending on WWII was a good example of that. It got the economy going, and, combined with the pent up demand both domestically and around the world, set us up for a good 25 years of running prosperity (where the government could then run a surplus.)


I get that that is the theory, so why not do that in 2007? Just announce that the government is going to hire 5,000,000 people who have jobs and pay them to go camping off the grid in the Rockies while simultaneously buying the full output of the US car manufacturers plus significant buying of other goods to supply the millions camping in the Rockies? If that is what pulled us out of the Depression, then just do it whenever the economy stalls, right?



“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
- John Adams
 
Posts: 29408 | Location: In the red hinterlands of Deep Blue VA | Registered: June 29, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I believe in the
principle of
Due Process
Picture of JALLEN
posted Hide Post
Deficit and debt, year by year.

https://www.thebalance.com/us-deficit-by-year-3306306




Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown
 
Posts: 48369 | Location: Texas hill country | Registered: July 04, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of fpuhan
posted Hide Post
Author Christopher Chantrill has written extensively on the U. S. economy, starting with the WWI era and continuing. Good reading, but a lot of data.

His two sites (that link together):

U. S. Stuck on Stupid

Road to the Middle Class

And if you want to get really depressed, using the government's own figures:

U. S. Government Spending




You can't truly call yourself "peaceful" unless you are capable of great violence. If you're not capable of great violence, you're not peaceful, you're harmless.

NRA Benefactor/Patriot Member
 
Posts: 2857 | Location: Peoples Republic of North Virginia | Registered: December 04, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

The US government was paying those soldiers and buying the goods. So, if that works, why not have the government pay millions of men and women to go camping in the Rockies - feed and clothe them and buy all of the output of Ford, GM and Chrysler?

If that fixed the economy, why not do that full time?

Exactly.



.
 
Posts: 9155 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
Picture of SgtGold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TigerDore:
quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

The US government was paying those soldiers and buying the goods. So, if that works, why not have the government pay millions of men and women to go camping in the Rockies - feed and clothe them and buy all of the output of Ford, GM and Chrysler?

If that fixed the economy, why not do that full time?

Exactly.



.


It doesn't work that way in the long run. Too much stimulus causes inflation, increased taxation, and finally stagflation.


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 7188 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
The Fed did it in other ways (dumping cash into the economy, buying all sorts of debt/bonds at inflated prices.) Sound different buy was the same thing. They also cut the SS tax. And does the term "shovel ready project" mean anything to you?

quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Even if you talk to Kenesian economists, they don't call for continuous, never ending deficit based "pump priming". It's supposed to be a temporary thing to boost the economy when it's stalling out. In that way the spending on WWII was a good example of that. It got the economy going, and, combined with the pent up demand both domestically and around the world, set us up for a good 25 years of running prosperity (where the government could then run a surplus.)


I get that that is the theory, so why not do that in 2007? Just announce that the government is going to hire 5,000,000 people who have jobs and pay them to go camping off the grid in the Rockies while simultaneously buying the full output of the US car manufacturers plus significant buying of other goods to supply the millions camping in the Rockies? If that is what pulled us out of the Depression, then just do it whenever the economy stalls, right?
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
That's why the Fed will pull back on the leash when they see it starting to happen. Notice that interest rates are going up now?

quote:
Originally posted by SgtGold:
quote:
Originally posted by TigerDore:
quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:

The US government was paying those soldiers and buying the goods. So, if that works, why not have the government pay millions of men and women to go camping in the Rockies - feed and clothe them and buy all of the output of Ford, GM and Chrysler?

If that fixed the economy, why not do that full time?

Exactly.



.


It doesn't work that way in the long run. Too much stimulus causes inflation, increased taxation, and finally stagflation.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Info Guru
Picture of BamaJeepster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
And does the term "shovel ready project" mean anything to you?


Yes, that is exactly my opinion of Keynesian economics!! Big Grin

This is a good article explains more in depth than I can get today:
WORLD WAR II AND THE TRIUMPH OF KEYNESIANISM

Also, can never pass up an opportunity to share these videos with anyone who may not have seen them:





“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
- John Adams
 
Posts: 29408 | Location: In the red hinterlands of Deep Blue VA | Registered: June 29, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
Not all of FDR's "New Deal" was bad, for example, the Civilian Conservation Corps. But neither it nor any of the other programs actually got us out of the depression. And the CCC in particular wouldn't work today. Construction isn't done any more by hundreds of guys with shovels, it is mechanized and professionalized, with a few guys running heavy equipment.
 
Posts: 29131 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
My dad was one of the CCC workers back then (before he married my mom). Unfortunately, I don't know anything about where he worked or what projects he helped build.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
"Shovel Ready" was more Keynesianism. It doesn't work.

quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
The Fed did it in other ways (dumping cash into the economy, buying all sorts of debt/bonds at inflated prices.) Sound different buy was the same thing. They also cut the SS tax. And does the term "shovel ready project" mean anything to you?

quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Even if you talk to Kenesian economists, they don't call for continuous, never ending deficit based "pump priming". It's supposed to be a temporary thing to boost the economy when it's stalling out. In that way the spending on WWII was a good example of that. It got the economy going, and, combined with the pent up demand both domestically and around the world, set us up for a good 25 years of running prosperity (where the government could then run a surplus.)


I get that that is the theory, so why not do that in 2007? Just announce that the government is going to hire 5,000,000 people who have jobs and pay them to go camping off the grid in the Rockies while simultaneously buying the full output of the US car manufacturers plus significant buying of other goods to supply the millions camping in the Rockies? If that is what pulled us out of the Depression, then just do it whenever the economy stalls, right?
 
Posts: 9155 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
I don't know about that. The Fed threw all it's Keynesian tricks at the 2008 recession. It never got to be a full on depression, and GDP recovered much more quickly than in the great depression.

quote:
Originally posted by TigerDore:
"Shovel Ready" was more Keynesianism. It doesn't work.

quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
The Fed did it in other ways (dumping cash into the economy, buying all sorts of debt/bonds at inflated prices.) Sound different buy was the same thing. They also cut the SS tax. And does the term "shovel ready project" mean anything to you?

quote:
Originally posted by BamaJeepster:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
Even if you talk to Kenesian economists, they don't call for continuous, never ending deficit based "pump priming". It's supposed to be a temporary thing to boost the economy when it's stalling out. In that way the spending on WWII was a good example of that. It got the economy going, and, combined with the pent up demand both domestically and around the world, set us up for a good 25 years of running prosperity (where the government could then run a surplus.)


I get that that is the theory, so why not do that in 2007? Just announce that the government is going to hire 5,000,000 people who have jobs and pay them to go camping off the grid in the Rockies while simultaneously buying the full output of the US car manufacturers plus significant buying of other goods to supply the millions camping in the Rockies? If that is what pulled us out of the Depression, then just do it whenever the economy stalls, right?
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The Keynesian Myth of the WWII Economic recovery

© SIGforum 2024