Got the demorrhoid campaign members box stuffing with absentee ballots.

Voter fraud by mail. Our local "conservative" political host openly mocks people claiming voter fraud and it can't possibly happen, well here it is.

This is a mayoral race in Connecticut.

I bet she didn't have her phone on her.

Are the vote fraudsters being prosecuted?

I haven't lived in CT in nearly 45 years and Bridgeport was a corrupt $#!thole then. I won't get into some of its nicknames.

I'm shocked I say... shocked.

quote:

Voter fraud by mail. Our local "conservative" political host openly mocks people claiming voter fraud and it can't possibly happen, well here it is.

Only in a Dem primary. Never in a race against a Republican...

Have either of those caught on the video been arrested?

quote:

Originally posted by Shaql:
Have either of those caught on the video been arrested?

Like anyone's even looking for them.

Connecticut Judge Throws Out Election Results and Orders New Primary After “Shocking” Evidence of Democrat Ballot Fraud

In Bridgeport, Connecticut, State Judge William Clark has thrown out the results of the September Democrat primary election and ordered a new primary to be scheduled and conducted [Court Order Here]. The issue was ballot harvesting and ballot fraud – both violations of state law.

The Judge reviewed CCTV footage showing Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member, working to support the party approved candidate. Both Ms Geter-Pataky and Ms Martinez participated in absentee ballot fraud, ballot harvesting and ballot stuffing at drop boxes. Both women invoked the Fifth Amendment when confronted as witnesses by the judge.

BRIDGEPORT – A judge ruled on Wednesday to overturn the city’s Democratic primary election, initially won by incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, following claims of absentee ballot fraud by his opponent, John Gomes.

After two weeks of evidentiary hearings for Gomes’s absentee ballot fraud lawsuit, Judge William Clark ordered a new Democratic primary based on 180 pieces of evidence presented by Gomes’s legal counsel.

In the 37-page ruling, Clark said the video footage presented by Bill Bloss – Gomes’s attorney – was particularly alarming.

“Mr. Ganim was also correct to be ‘shocked’ at what he saw on the video clips in evidence that were shown to him while he was on the witness stand,” Clark wrote. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.

Ganin was one the many city officials called to the Fairfield Judicial District Superior Courthouse for questioning, along with Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member accused by Gomes of stuffing ballot dropboxes.

At the witness stand, Ganim told the court he was “shocked” by an 18-minute video – subpoenaed by Gomes from Bridgeport police – that appeared to show 12 instances of Geter-Pataky either depositing stacks of ballots herself or handing ballots to others from behind her reception desk, and four instances of Martinez dropping off ballots.

Asked about the footage during the hearings, both Geter-Pataky and Martinez asserted their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination . Ganim, who appeared to win the primary by 250 votes after a count of absentee ballots, denied any involvement in the alleged fraud. (read more)

You don’t need to guess the ideology of the ballot harvesting participants. You know.

https://theconservativetreehou...t-fraud/#more-252683

Bububuuuuut there is no evidence.

Certainly a “tip of the iceberg” discovery.

Fraud by mail here in Georgia in Fulton County is what Stacy Abrams tank was counting on.

Conspiracy theories aren't what they used to be. Sooner or later, we're going to start calling them conspiracy facts.

quote:

Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
Certainly a “tip of the iceberg” discovery.

Truest statement of the day.

If the Democrats are rigging a primary election, or in other words screwing a member of their own party, what do you think they'll do against a Republican???

What does that tell you about the lengths they'll go to assure a specific person gets in a position of power.

Photos in this Dailymail article:
https://mol.im/a/12712019

quote:

Originally posted by Rightwire:
If the Democrats are rigging a primary election, or in other words screwing a member of their own party, what do you think they'll do against a Republican???

What does that tell you about the lengths they'll go to assure a specific person gets in a position of power.

Can you say "Biden". Brain dead buffoon polling close to zero, about to drop out and low and behold, he becomes the "democratic forerunner"

In court pleading the 5th.

"... at a level that disenfranchises..."

OK. Let's replace the total volume of legitimate votes cast and call it "water", and let's replace the number of fraudulent votes and call it "fecal matter", and then ask if a glass of that water is "disenfranchisement" to the person that would otherwise have pure water to drink.

Any fraud, should ruin the election, and those caught and convicted should be made know to the public, and such penalties and/or consequences should be so harsh as to make the thought of election fraud a fearful thing.

The fact that it is seen less serious than a 6 year old stealing a piece of candy and at worst, suffering a scolding, is abhorrent.

^^^ Thank you Sir Monkey. That comment got me too but as usual, your response is more fitting. Glad to have you around.